Skip to main content

Bichir and a big step backwards

A recent paper research by Tino Moritz and Ralf Britz - Revision of the extant Polypteridae.

In the paper it was concluded by this 2 dude that the P. Lapradei and P.Bichir Bichir is no longer a valid subspecies or a species of its own. They're merged all into just P. Bichir.

"Based on analysis of our data we synonymise P. lapradei and P. bichir katangae with P. bichir and only recognize a single species, however, with geographical variation in meristic counts. The cause of the sometimes striking differences in coloration remains unclear."

This is a big blow for the fish hobbyist especially for those trophies collectors. And I guess it will be chaotic for new comers as anybody can sell PBL with 7 marking as PBBs. Apart from this it is actually a sad news, what have they done? Science is always about moving forward, but this 2 buggers just took everything backwards and lets breakdown the publish paper and see how they had derived to this mad conclusion.

"Material examined. 148 specimens." 
heres the list :



The 148 specimens includes 95pcs of recorded specimens since year 1799 The remaining specimens actually done by this 2 is

"Additional material. (53pcs) nile Basin: DMM IE/10412, 2, Sudan: Khartoum [central fish market]; T. Moritz et al., Apr 2008."

I presume central fish market is a wet market selling dead food fish. Now let us go for a joy ride of the life of the Polypterus Lapradei:

"In 1869, Steindachner published the description of a new bichir from the Senegal, Polypterus lapradei. He noted that the essential difference between P. lapradei and P. bichir is the shape of the head, whereas counts of dorsal-fin spines and scales show an overlapping gradient: 14-15 vs. 15-17 dorsal-fin spines, 60-62 vs. 64 scales in lateral row, 13-14 vs. 12-13 pre-dorsal scales (values given in Steindachner, 1869). "
The discovery of P.Lapradei by Steindachner in 1869. (Senegal)

"Polypterus lapradei had been regarded as a valid species until Poll (1941a-b, 1942) referred to it as a subspecies of P. bichir" 
But poll 1941 published a Polypterus Bichir Katangae (Congo) an enigma sp Congicus unconfirm until today. Possible that I got it wrong or they got it wrong, poll seems not connected to P.Lapradei.

"Since the beginning of the 1970s this view has become widely accepted (Gosse, 1984). In his keys for West African polypterid species, Gosse (1990, 2003) employed the following criteria to distinguish both subspecies: number of scales in a longitudinal series and number of dorsal-fin spines, but noted that both meristic characters show overlap. He also stated and illustrated disjunct distribution areas for the two subspecies: the Benoué River and river basins west of it for P. bichir lapradei, and the Chad basin and river basins east of it for P. bichir bichir (Gosse, 1990, 2003)."
Gosse further reconfirm that P.B.lapradei being a subspecies. (Nigerian)

" Schäfer (2004) in his popular book on bichirs treated P. lapradei again as a valid species, and distinguished it from P. bichir by details of the color pattern: P. lapradei was considered to possess usually clearly marked longitudinal stripes in the anterior region of body"
P.Lapradei was again promoted back to a valid species by Schäfer in 2004. (Nigerian)

"Based on analysis of our data we synonymise P. lapradei and P. bichir katangae with P. bichir and only recognize a single species, however, with geographical variation in meristic counts. The cause of the sometimes striking differences in coloration remains unclear. "
Everyone was so eager to read the new paper as we hope that for sp koliba and sp kolonton to be a subspecies or a species of its own, but instead they concluded that everything is now group into Polypterus Bichir. No more PBB no more PBL no more everything.

They were so confused with all the variant of PBB and all the variant of PBL and they even mixed in sp koliba. Furthermore any experience bichir keeper knows that it is near impossible to ID a dead bichir from a wet market probably all wash out color and pattern. I wonder how this 2 dude manage to ID them without DNA sampling. They were totally lost and made a conclusion to group them all up that they have forgotten the Nigerian Lapradei!!!

They have only compared  meristic data and Morphometric characters in a Box-and-whisker plots statistic. No DNA samples were taken from any of the bichirs. And the blunder so great on the P.B. katangae that are in the Congicus group is now mixed into Polypterus Bichir.

Can a research paper get anymore sloppier than this? It was an insult to all the previous ichthyologist. They were supposed to catch on site the fish from nigerian or any other place proposed for the study. Not just passed a conclusion based on some 200 years old record.

Without catching the fish yourself you are depending on fisherman to tell you the origin of the fish, is this science? 99.9% fisherman will not reveal the actual catch location! and they didnt know this? What good is there in buying dead fish from Sudan 1000 miles away from nigeria where the population of PBL is? Of coz you'll see differences from those previous catalog specimen...geezzzz!

In laymans term:

Dr.A found a nigerian lap and said hey look I found a lap
Dr.B found koliba in guinea and say so this is how lap look like and gave a description
Dr.C found kolonton and gave another new description
This 2 dude publish a paper and say too many discrepancy, lets scrap everything and put them all in PB.

There you go he totally forgot the most important Nigeria lap.

Pray hard that this 2 do not do any research on marulius and Marulioides!

Polypterus Bichir Bichir (Chad)

Polypterus Bichir Lapradei (Nigeria)










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The science behind Channa Marulioides colors and pattern

Channa Marulioides is the chameleon of the fish, they are the champion when comes to color changing abilities. In a split second they can change from greenish brown to yellow and to orange. They can change their eye color from black to bright red. Observe your Channa Marulioides and you can see they greet you with bright yellow colors doing the maru dance, they flashes their bands to the highest contrast. The body colors are intense and their eyes bright vampire red in colors. When they are tone down and just swim about their business you notice the color is dull when they are in mid water, and suddenly sinking to the bottom with bright orange (depending on the var and PH) they keep changing and flashing their bands and patterns. But the black and white flowers will remain so in whichever mood they display. Also take note that maru shows their best colors mostly at midnight. Each Channa Marulioides comes in its own unique pattern of bands and flowers, like a fingerprint, I beli

Tanning Marulioides

Another way you can bloom the flower of your marulioides is with the tanning technique. First lets understand a little bit about the flower. The flower is actually a dead pixel, marulioides are very unique fish, they possessed the ability to change color at will like a chameleon. But when the flower is formed that scale is spoiled and no longer changes color, it cannot get darker or lighter. As mentioned many times marulioides caught in river or big water always shows minimal flower, maru caught in dead water like peat swamp shows maximum flowers. Maru would need the color changing ability to survive, they can change color to hunt and to escape from predators. Meanwhile maru living in black dead water swamp do not need the color changing ability as much or maybe the low PH somehow destroy the color changing ability and the result will be plentiful of flowers or plenty of spoiled scale. I've done experiment on maru living in fast cycled tank and they lose the flowers or in ano

Marulioides Care Part 1 (Bunga)

I've been reluctant to write this but many had asked me to post how to take care of marulioides for maximum performance. The truth is you need to abused it, hence Marulioides care isn't exactly the correct terms to use. Channa Marulioides is found in most part of malaysia, lakes, pond, streams, rivers, but one thing most fisherman realized are those caught in swamp, I mean really dead stagnant peat swamp. Waters that are near black in color most time the fish had tremendous performance, beautiful colors and a lot of flowers. From this theory many tried replicating the conditions with low ph and so on. I've experiment many ways of keeping marulioides and I can concur to this, Low PH meaning Ph5 and below, I usually keeps mine ard PH4 or maybe lower, because my test kit can only measure till 4 and cant read anything lower. Low PH produce beautiful coloration. As for the bunga, yes everybody wants to know this, there is no tricks, just lots and lots of experiment. It i