Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Invasive Alien Species in Switzerland: Awareness and Preferences of Experts and the Public

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Invasive alien species (IAS) can cause ecological and economic damages. To reduce or prevent these damages different management and prevention strategies aim to impede new establishments or a further spreading of IAS. However, for these measures to be successful, public knowledge of risks and threats of IAS as well as public support for eradication measures are important prerequisites. We conducted a survey to examine (i) public and experts’ awareness and knowledge of IAS, (ii) their preferences for six invasive plant species and (iii) their preferences for and trade-offs among management alternatives in Switzerland. In addition, a choice experiment was applied to analyse preferences concerning the intensity, priority and costs of interventions. Both, the Swiss public and the experts have a preference for intervening against invasive alien species. However, the public and the experts differ in their priorities of combatting particular species, resulting in a different ranking of intervention necessities. Further, differences were found in the willingness to pay for interventions between the German-, French- and Italian-speaking parts of Switzerland. The results suggest that a higher problem awareness increases the willingness to pay for countermeasures. We conclude that education programs or information campaigns are promising instruments to raise public awareness and to avoid conflicts concerning the management of invasive alien species.

Highlights “Invasive Alien Species in Switzerland: Awareness and Preferences of Experts and the Public”

  • The public and experts in Switzerland approve the management of invasive neophytes

  • Willingness to pay estimates for the management of invasive alien species (IAS) vary between 7 and 38 Mio. Swiss Francs (SFr.)/year

  • Ecological aspects in IAS management receive a higher priority than economic aspects

  • However, only 40% of the public know the term IAS

  • Providing information on the threats of IAS increases awareness and reduces aesthetic preferences for the respective species

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The National Data and Information Center on the Swiss Flora; available online: https://www.infoflora.ch/en/neophytes/lists.html. Accessed 1 October 2018

  2. The Swiss national strategy on IAS management is available online (in German): https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/de/home/themen/biodiversitaet/fachinformationen/massnahmen-zur-erhaltung-und-foerderung-der-biodiversitaet/erhaltung-und-foerderung-von-arten/invasive-gebietsfremde-arten.html Accessed 1 October 2018

References

  • Adams D, Bwenge A, Lee D, Larkin S, Larkin SL (2011) Public preferences for controlling upland invasive plants in state parks: application of a choice model. For Policy Econ 13:465–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albers HJ, Fischer C, Sanchirico JN (2010) Invasive species management in a spatially heterogeneous world: effects of uniform policies. Resour Energy Econ 32:483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkmann J, Glenk K, Keil A, Leemhuis C, Dietrich N, Gerold G, Marggraf R (2008) Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: the case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods. Ecol Econ 65:48–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Mawby J (2004) First impressions count: interviewer appearance and information effects in stated preference studies. Ecol Econ 49:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett J, Adamowicz V (2001) Some fundamentals of environmental choice modelling. In: Bennett J, Blamey R (eds.) The choice modeling approach to environmental valuation.. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, p 37–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierlaire M (2003) BIOGEME: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland. http://biogeme.epfl.ch/ Accessed 20 November2017

  • Bierlaire M (2008) An introduction to BIOGEME Version 1.6. http://biogeme.epfl.ch/ Accessed 20 November 2017

  • Bremner A, Park K (2007) Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland. Biol Conserv 139:306–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijs A, Arts BJM, Elands BHM, Lengkeek J (2011) Beyond environmental frames: the social representation and cultural resonance of nature in conflicts over a Dutch woodland. Geoforum 42:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie M, Hanley N, Warren J, Murphy K, Wright R, Hyde T (2006) Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecol Econ 58:304–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ChoiceMetrix (2012) Ngene. The cutting edge in Experimental Design. User manual and reference guide. Version 1.1.1. Sydney, ChoiceMetrix, pp 248

  • Colombo S, Hanley N (2008) How can we reduce the errors from benefits transfer? An investigation using the choice experiment method. Land Econ 84:128–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czajkowski M, Hanley N (2009) Using labels to investigate scope effects in stated preference methods. Environ Resour Econ 44:521–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot WT, van den Born RJG (2003) Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in The Netherlands. Landsc Urban Plan 63:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, van Liere KD (1978) The “new environmental paradigm”: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Environ Educ 9:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE (2000) New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues 56:425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epanchin-Niell RS, Wilen JE (2012) Optimal spatial control of biological invasions. Environ Econ Manag 63:260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal statistical Office (2015) Die Bevölkerung der Schweiz 2014. Neuchâtel, pp 30

  • Fischer A, van der Wal R (2007) Invasive plant suppresses charismatic seabird—he construction of attitudes towards biodiversity management options. Biol Conserv 135:256–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Llorente M, Martin Lopez B, Gonzalez J, Alcorlo P, Montes C, García Llorente M, Martín López B, González J (2008) Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management. Biol Conserv 141:2969–2983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, Nunes PALD, González JA, Alcorlo P, Montes C (2011) Analyzing the social factors that influence willingness to pay for invasive alien species management under two different strategies: eradication and prevention. Environ Manag 48:418–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi P, Shine C (2004) European strategy on invasive alien species: Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Habitats (Bern Convention). Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.

  • Gren I-M (2008) Economics of alien invasive species management—choices of targets and policies. Boreal Environ Res 13:17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes TP, Aukema JE, Von Holle B, Liebhold A, Sills E (2009) Economic impacts of invasive species in forests past, present, and future. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1162:18–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Haack RA, Zhang R (2011) Does global warming increase establishment rates of invasive alien species? A centurial time series analysis. PLoS ONE 6:e24733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J Appl Ecol 43:835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humair F, Edwards PJ, Siegrist M, Kueffer C (2014a) Understanding misunderstandings in invasion science: why experts don’t agree on common concepts and risk assessments. NeoBiota 20:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humair F, Siegrist M, Kueffer C (2014b) Working with the horticultural industry to limit invasion risks: the Swiss experience. EPPO Bull 44:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen JB, Boiesen JH, Thorsen BJ, Strange N (2008) What’s in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus ‘Iconised’species when valuing biodiversity. Environ Resour Econ 39:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies P (2016) Beasts or beauties? Laypersons’ perception of invasive alien plant species in Switzerland and attitudes towards their management. NeoBiota 29:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere JJ (2001) Choice experiments: an overview of concepts and issues. In: Bennett J, Blamey R (eds) The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation. Edward Elgar, Northhampton, p 13–36

    Google Scholar 

  • MAE (2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: Current Stade and Trends. Island Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York, NY, p 105–142

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA (2001) The great reshuffling: human dimensions of invasive alien species. IUCN, Switzerland

  • Nunes PALD, van den Bergh JCJM (2004) Can people value protection against invasive marine species? evidence from a joint TC–CV survey in the Netherlands. Environ Resour Econ 28:517–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olschewski R (2013) How to value protection from natural hazards—a step-by-step discrete choice approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:913–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pejchar L, Mooney HA (2009) Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol Evol 24:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philip LJ, MacMillan DC (2005) Exploring values, context and perceptions in contingent valuation studies: the CV market stall technique and willingness to pay for wildlife conservation. J Environ Plan Manag 48:257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz PW, Zelezny L (1999) Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries. J Environ Psychol 19:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selge S, Fischer A (2011) Public and professional views on invasive non-native species—qualitative social scientific investigation. Biol Conserv 144:3089–3097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp R, Larson L, Green G (2011) Factors influencing public preferences for invasive alien species management. Biol Conserv 144:2097–2104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheremet O, Ruokamo E, Juutinen A, Svento R, Hanley N (2018) How best to pay landowners to control invasive species? Evidence from disease control programs in Finland. Paper presented at the 20. BIOECON conference 2018 ‘Land-use, Agriculture and Biodiversity: Spatial and Temporal Issues’ available at http://www.bioecon-network.org/pages/20th%202018/papers20.html

  • Simberloff D, Martin J-L, Genovesi P, Maris V, Wardle DA, Aronson J, Courchamp F, Galil B, García-Berthou E, Pascal M (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taramarcaz P, Lambelet C, Clot B, Keimer C, Hauser C (2005) Ragweed (Ambrosia) progression and its health risks: will Switzerland resist this invasion? Swiss Med Wkly 135:538–548

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Davis M (2011) Why research on traits of invasive plants tells us very little. Trends Ecol Evol 26:155–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valéry L, Fritz H, Lefeuvre J-C (2013) Another call for the end of invasion biology. Oikos 122:1143–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Born CG, Lenders RHJ, de Groot W, Huijsman E (2001) The new biophilia: an exploration of visions of nature in western countries. Environ Conserv 28:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal R, Fischer A, Selge S, Larson BMH (2015) Neither the public nor experts judge species primarily on their origins Environmental Conservation 42:349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veitch C, Clout M (2001) Human dimensions in the management of invasive species in New Zealand. The Great Reshuffling. Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, United Kingdom, p 63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Hulme PE (2016) Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services. Springer, Berlin.

  • Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Basnou C, Pysek P, Josefsson M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Nentwig W, Olenin S, Roques A, Roy D, Hulme PE, DAISIE partners (2010) How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front Ecol Environ 8(3):135–144. https://doi.org/10.1890/080083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther GR, Gritti ES, Berger S, Hickler T, Tang Z, Sykes MT (2007) Palms tracking climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:801–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther G-R, Roques A, Hulme PE, Sykes MT, Pyšek P, Kühn I, Zobel M, Bacher S, Botta-Dukát Z, Bugmann H, Czúcz B, Dauber J, Hickler T, Jarošík V, Kenis M, Klotz S, Minchin D, Moora M, Nentwig W, Ott J, Panov VE, Reineking B, Robinet C, Semenchenko V, Solarz W, Thuiller W, Vilà M, Vohland K, Settele J (2009) Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 24:686–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg R, Kenis M, Blick T, Hänggi A, Gassmann A, Weber E (2005) An inventory of alien species and their threat to biodiversity and economy in Switzerland. CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre report to the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape. The environment in practice no. 0629. Federal Office for the Environment, Switzerland

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Competence Center Environment and Sustainability of the ETH Domain CCES for financial support. In addition, we thank the experts for their support and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Xenia Junge, Marcel Hunziker, Nicole Bauer & Roland Olschewski

  2. Dialog N, Seestrasse 121, 8610, Uster, Switzerland

    Xenia Junge

  3. Institute for Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning (ILEN), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter-Jordan-Strasse 65, 1180, Vienna, Austria

    Arne Arnberger

Authors
  1. Xenia Junge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcel Hunziker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicole Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arne Arnberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roland Olschewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xenia Junge.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Junge, X., Hunziker, M., Bauer, N. et al. Invasive Alien Species in Switzerland: Awareness and Preferences of Experts and the Public. Environmental Management 63, 80–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1115-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1115-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation