WO1998006143A1 - Apparatus and methods for cleaning delicate parts - Google Patents

Apparatus and methods for cleaning delicate parts Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1998006143A1
WO1998006143A1 PCT/US1997/012853 US9712853W WO9806143A1 WO 1998006143 A1 WO1998006143 A1 WO 1998006143A1 US 9712853 W US9712853 W US 9712853W WO 9806143 A1 WO9806143 A1 WO 9806143A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
frequency
generator
transducer
ultrasound
bandwidth
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1997/012853
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
William L. Puskas
Original Assignee
Puskas William L
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Puskas William L filed Critical Puskas William L
Priority to AU39621/97A priority Critical patent/AU3962197A/en
Priority to CA002262540A priority patent/CA2262540C/en
Publication of WO1998006143A1 publication Critical patent/WO1998006143A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J19/00Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J19/08Processes employing the direct application of electric or wave energy, or particle radiation; Apparatus therefor
    • B01J19/10Processes employing the direct application of electric or wave energy, or particle radiation; Apparatus therefor employing sonic or ultrasonic vibrations
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B06GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS IN GENERAL
    • B06BMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OF INFRASONIC, SONIC, OR ULTRASONIC FREQUENCY, e.g. FOR PERFORMING MECHANICAL WORK IN GENERAL
    • B06B1/00Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency
    • B06B1/02Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy
    • B06B1/0207Driving circuits
    • B06B1/0223Driving circuits for generating signals continuous in time
    • B06B1/0269Driving circuits for generating signals continuous in time for generating multiple frequencies
    • B06B1/0276Driving circuits for generating signals continuous in time for generating multiple frequencies with simultaneous generation, e.g. with modulation, harmonics
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B06GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS IN GENERAL
    • B06BMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OF INFRASONIC, SONIC, OR ULTRASONIC FREQUENCY, e.g. FOR PERFORMING MECHANICAL WORK IN GENERAL
    • B06B1/00Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency
    • B06B1/02Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy
    • B06B1/06Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy operating with piezoelectric effect or with electrostriction
    • B06B1/0607Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy operating with piezoelectric effect or with electrostriction using multiple elements
    • B06B1/0611Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy operating with piezoelectric effect or with electrostriction using multiple elements in a pile
    • B06B1/0618Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy operating with piezoelectric effect or with electrostriction using multiple elements in a pile of piezo- and non-piezoelectric elements, e.g. 'Tonpilz'
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B06GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS IN GENERAL
    • B06BMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OF INFRASONIC, SONIC, OR ULTRASONIC FREQUENCY, e.g. FOR PERFORMING MECHANICAL WORK IN GENERAL
    • B06B1/00Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency
    • B06B1/02Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy
    • B06B1/06Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy operating with piezoelectric effect or with electrostriction
    • B06B1/0607Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy operating with piezoelectric effect or with electrostriction using multiple elements
    • B06B1/0622Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy operating with piezoelectric effect or with electrostriction using multiple elements on one surface
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/004Mounting transducers, e.g. provided with mechanical moving or orienting device
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/004Mounting transducers, e.g. provided with mechanical moving or orienting device
    • G10K11/006Transducer mounting in underwater equipment, e.g. sonobuoys
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B06GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS IN GENERAL
    • B06BMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OF INFRASONIC, SONIC, OR ULTRASONIC FREQUENCY, e.g. FOR PERFORMING MECHANICAL WORK IN GENERAL
    • B06B2201/00Indexing scheme associated with B06B1/0207 for details covered by B06B1/0207 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • B06B2201/70Specific application
    • B06B2201/71Cleaning in a tank

Definitions

  • the invention relates to systems and methods for cleaning and /or processing delicate parts, e.g., semiconductor wafers.
  • the invention relates to ultrasonic systems, ultrasonic generators, ultrasonic transducers, and methods which support or enhance the application of ultrasonic energy within liquid.
  • Ultrasonic energy has many uses; and applications of ultrasound are widespread in medicine, in the military industrial complex, and in engineering.
  • One use of ultrasound in modern manufacturing and processing is to process and /or clean objects within liquids.
  • objects within an aqueous solution such as water can be cleaned by applying ultrasonic energy to the water.
  • Typical ultrasound transducers are, for example, made from materials such as piezoelectrics, ceramics, or magnetostrictives (aluminum and iron alloys or nickel and iron alloys) which oscillate with the frequency of the applied voltage or current. These transducers transmit ultrasound into a tank filled with liquid that also covers some or all of the object to be cleaned or processed.
  • the transducer By driving the transducer at its operational resonant frequency, e.g., 18khz, 25khz, 40khz, 670khz or IMhz, the transducer imparts ultrasonic energy to the liquid and, hence, to the object.
  • the interaction between the energized liquid and the object create the desired cleaning or processing action.
  • these transducers were bonded to or placed in tanks which housed the cleaning or processing liquid.
  • such tanks were constructed of a material compatible with the processing liquid, such as: 316L stainless steel for most aqueous chemistries; 304 stainless steel for many solvents; plastics such as Teflon, polypropylene, and metals such as tantalum for strong acids; and coated metals such as Teflon-coated stainless steel for corrosive liquids.
  • the transducers were attached to, or made integral with, the tank.
  • epoxy bonds or brazing were used to attach the transducers to tanks made of metallic stainless steel, tantalum, titanium, or Hastalloy.
  • the drive elements of the transducers were machined or cast into the tank material, and the piezoelectric ceramic and backplates were assembled to the drive elements.
  • the prior art also provides systems which utilize ultrasonic transducers in conjunction with plastic tanks. Typically, the tank's plastic surface was etched to create a surface that facilitated an epoxy bond thereon. The transducers were bonded with epoxy to the etched surface, and various techniques were used to keep the system cool to protect the plastic from deterioration.
  • One such technique was to bond the transducers to an aluminum plate that would act as a heat-sink, and then to bond the aluminum plate to the plastic surface. Often, fans would be directed toward the aluminum plate and the transducers so as to enhance cooling.
  • Another cooling technique utilized a thin plastic, or a process of machining the plastic at the trasnducer bonding position, to provide a thin wall at the transducer mounting position. This technique enhanced the cooling of the plastic and transducer by improved heat conduction into the liquid, and further improved the coupling of sound into the processing liquid because of less sound absorption.
  • plastic formulations such as PEEK (polyetheretherketone)
  • the prior art made improvements to the plastic ultrasonic tank by further reducing the sound absorption within the plastic material .
  • the prior art further developed techniques for molding the transducers into the plastic material, such as through injection and rotational molding, which further improved the manufacturing of the tank as well as the processing characteristics within the tank.
  • the prior art used epoxy to bond the transducer to the tank surface. Casting the transducer into the material was also possible, but was not commercially used. Often, the radiating surface (i.e., the surface(s) with the ultrasonic transducers mounted thereon or therein), usually the tank bottom, would be pitched by at lease one-quarter wavelength to upset standing ⁇ vave patterns within the tank. Other tank configurations which provided similar advantages are reported in the prior art, such as disclosed by Javorik in U.S. Patent No. 4,836,684.
  • the transducer support structure can be made out of an inexpensive material, such as stainless steel; the coupling liquid can be a relatively inert substance, such as Dl water; and the process tank can be a material such as quartz or plastic material, which fares well with an aggressive chemistry such as sulfuric acid.
  • the transducer driving a relatively inert coupling liquid can deliver ultrasound into several different processing tanks, each containing different chemistries.
  • the coupling fluid can be chosen so that its threshold of cavitation is above the cavitation threshold of the processing chemistry; and the depth of the coupling liquid can be adjusted for maximum transmission efficiency into the process tank(s).
  • U.S. Patent No. 4,543,130 discloses one double boiler system where sound is transmitted into an inert liquid, through a quartz window, and into the semiconductor cleaning liquid.
  • the prior art also recognizes multi-functional, single chamber ultrasonic process systems which deliver ultrasonic cleaning or processing to liquids.
  • the cleaning, rinsing, and drying are done in the same tank.
  • Pedziwiatr discloses one such system in U.S. Patent No. 4,409,999, where a single ultrasonic cleaning tank is alternately filled and drained with cleaning solution and rinsing solution, and is thereafter supplied with drying air.
  • Other examples of single- chamber ultrasonic process systems are disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,690,333; 5,143,103; 5,201,958, and German Patent No. 29 50 893.
  • directed field tanks are sometimes employed where the parts to be processed have fairly significant absorption at ultrasonic frequencies. More particularly, a directed field tank has transducers mounted on several sides of the tank, where each side is angled such that ultrasound is directed toward the center of the tank from the several sides. This technique is useful, for example, in supplying ultrasound to the center of a filled wafer boat.
  • the prior art methods for eliminating or reducing the damage caused by the energy in each cavitation implosion are well known.
  • the energy in each cavitation implosion decreases as the temperature of the liquid is increased, as the pressure on the liquid is decreased, as the surface tension of the liquid is decreased, and as the frequency of the sound is increased. Any one or combination of these methods are used to decrease the energy in each cavitation implosion.
  • the base media for a hard disk is an aluminum lapped and polished disk. These disks are subjected to 40khz ultrasonic cleaning in aqueous solutions with moderate temperature, often resulting in pitting caused by cavitation that removes the base material from the surface of the aluminum disk. As discussed above, one solution to this problem is to raise the temperature of the aqueous solution to above 90°C. This causes the energy in each cavitation implosion to be less than the energy which typically removes base material from the aluminum disk.
  • wet bench systems often consist of several low frequency ultrasonic and /or megasonic tanks with different chemistries disposed therein. For example, a cleaning tank followed by two rinsing tanks, usually in a reverse cascading configuration, is a common wet bench configuration.
  • the energy in each cavitation implosion the highest energy cavitation implosion that does not cause cavitation damage to the part being processed or cleaned.
  • the energy in each cavitation implosion, for a given frequency will be different in each tank. Therefore, not all tanks will have the optimum value of energy in each cavitation implosion.
  • This problem has been addressed in the prior art by using different frequency ultrasonics in the different tanks.
  • the cleaning tank can have a chemistry with low surface tension, where a low frequency such as 40khz gives the optimum energy in each cavitation implosion.
  • the rinsing tanks might use Dl water, which has a high surface tension; and thus 72khz ultrasonics may be needed to match the energy of the 40khz tank for each cavitation implosion .
  • high frequency ultrasonic systems are single-frequency, continuous wave (CW) systems which operate from 600khz to about 2Mhz, a frequency range which is referred to as "megasonics" in the prior art.
  • CW continuous wave
  • megasonic systems of the prior art overcame many of the disadvantages and problems associated with 25k hz to 50khz systems.
  • megasonic systems depend on the microstreaming effect present in ultrasonic fields to give enhanced processing or cleaning. Resonant effects, although theoretically present, are minimal because the geometries of the delicate parts are typically not resonant at megasonic frequencies. As geometries become smaller, however, such as in state-of-the-art equipment, certain prior art megasonic systems have had to increase their operating frequencies to 2Mhz or greater.
  • An alternative to higher frequency megasonics is to optimize the ultrasonic * energies with amplitude modulation (AM) of a frequency modulated (FM) wave.
  • Such systems operate by adjusting one of seven ultrasonic generator parameters - center frequency, bandwidth, sweep time, train time, degas time, burst time, and quiet time - to adjust one or more of the following characteristics within the liquid : energy in each cavitation implosion, average cavitation density, cavitation density as a function of time, cavitation density as a function of position in the tank and average gaseous concentration .
  • the microstreaming mechanism upon which megasonics depends penetrates the boundary layer next to a semiconductor wafer and relies on a pumping action to continuously deliver fresh solution to the wafer surface while simultaneously removing contamination and spent chemistry Cleaning or processing with megasonics therefore depends upon (a) the chemical action of the particular cleamng, rinsing, or processing chemistry m the megasonics tank, and (b) the microstreaming which delivers the chemistry to the surface of the part being processed, ⁇ nsed, or cleaned
  • the megasonic piezoelectric ceramic is put into tension at 600,000 times per second (i.e., 600khz), at least, during operation. This tension causes the ceramics to crack because it weakens and fatigues the material with repeated cycles.
  • Two other problems of prior art megasonic systems relate to the nature of high frequency sound waves in a liquid. Sound waves with frequencies above 500khz travel like a beam within liquid, and further exhibit high attenuation. This beam effect is a problem because it is very difficult to uniformly fill the process or cleaning tank with the acoustic field.
  • the prior art has devised techniques to compensate for the beam effect, such as by (a) spreading the sound around the tank through use of acoustic lenses, or by (b) physically moving the parts through the acoustic beam.
  • the beam and attenuation effects of megasonic systems result in non-uniform processing, and other undesirable artifacts.
  • frequency sweeping ultrasonic systems increase the ultrasonic activity in the tank because there is less loss due to wave cancellation.
  • One of the first frequency sweeping ultrasonic generators had a bandwidth of 2khz, a sweep rate of lOOhz, and a center frequency of 40khz.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide improvements to ultrasonic generators, to transducers applying ultrasound energy to liquids, and to methods for reducing the damage to delicate parts.
  • Still another object of the invention to provide a method of supplying suitable energies in each cavitation implosion, in a single chamber process system, where different chemistries are used in different parts of the process.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide an ultrasonic generator that reduces the repetition of low frequency components from an ultrasonic bath to reduce or eliminate low frequency resonances within the bath.
  • One objective of this invention is to overcome certain disadvantages of prior art megasonic systems while retaining certain advantages of megasonic cleaning and /or processing.
  • Still another object of this invention is to provide methodology of improved amplitude control in ultrasonic systems.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide systems which reduce or eliminate beating and/ or cross-talk within a liquid caused by simultaneous operation of a plurality of generators.
  • ultrasound and “ultrasonic” generally refer to acoustic disturbances in a frequency range above about eighteen kilohertz and which extend upwards to over two megahertz.
  • “Lower frequency” ultrasound, or “low frequency” ultrasound mean ultrasoLind between about 18khz and 90khz.
  • “Megasonics” or “megasonic” refer to acoustic disturbances between 600khz and 2Mhz.
  • the prior art has manufactured “low frequency” and “megasonic” ultrasound systems. Typical prior art low frequency systems, for example, operate at 25khz, 40khz, and as high as 90khz.
  • Typical prior art megasonic systems operate between 600khz and IMhz. Certain aspects of the invention apply to low frequency ultrasound and to megasonics. However, certain aspects of the invention apply to ultrasound in the lOOkhz to 350khz region, a frequency range which is sometimes denoted herein as "microsonics.”
  • resonant transducer means a transducer operated at a frequency or in a range of frequencies that correspond to a one-half wavelength ( ⁇ ) of sound in the transducer stack.
  • Harmonic transducer means a transducer operated at a frequency or in a range of frequencies that correspond to l ⁇ , 1.5 ⁇ , 2 ⁇ or 2.5 ⁇ of sound, and so on, in the transducer stack.
  • Bandwidth means the range of frequencies in a resonant or harmonic region of a transducer over which the acoustic power output of a transducer remains between 50% and 100% of the maximum value.
  • a "delicate part” refers to those parts which are undergoing a manufacture, process, or cleaning operation within liquid subjected to ultrasonic energy.
  • one delicate part is a semiconductor wafer which has extremely small features and which is easily damaged by cavitation implosion.
  • a delicate part often defines components in the computer industry, including disk drives, semiconductor components, and the like.
  • khz refers to kilohertz and a frequency magnitude of one thousand hertz.
  • Mhz refers to megahertz and a frequency magnitude of one million hertz.
  • sweep rate or “sweep frequency” refer to the rate or frequency at which a generator and transducer's frequency is varied. That is, it is generally undesirable to operate an ultrasonic transducer at a fixed, single frequency because of the resonances created at that frequency. Therefore, an ultrasonic generator can sweep (i.e., linearly change) the operational frequency through some or all of the available frequencies within the transducer's bandwidth at a "sweep rate.” Accordingly, particular frequencies have only short duration during the sweep cycle (i.e., the time period for sweeping the ultrasound frequency through a range of frequencies within the bandwidth).
  • “Sweep the sweep rate” or “double sweeping” or “dual sweep” refer to an operation of changing the sweep rate as a function of time.
  • “sweeping the sweep rate” generally refers to the operation of sweeping (i.e., linearly changing) the sweep rate so as to reduce or eliminate resonances generated at the sweep frequency.
  • the present invention concerns the applied uses of ultrasound energy, and in particular the application and control of ultrasonics to clean and process delicate parts, e.g., semiconductor wafers, within a liquid.
  • one or more ultrasonic generators drive one or more ultrasonic transducers, or arrays of transducers, coupled to a liquid to clean and /or process the delicate part.
  • the liquid is preferably held within a tank; and the transducers mount on or within the tank to impart ultrasound into the liquid.
  • the invention is particularly directed to one or more of the following aspects and advantages:
  • the invention By utilizing harmonics of certain clamped ultrasound transducers, the invention generates, in one aspect, ultrasound within the liquid in a frequency range of between about lOOkhz to 350khz (i.e., "microsonic" frequencies).
  • microwave frequencies i.e., "microsonic" frequencies.
  • the invention eliminates or greatly reduces damaging cavitation implosions within the liquid.
  • the transducers operating in this frequency range provide relatively uniform microstreaming, such as provided by megasonics; but they are also relatively rugged and reliable, unlike megasonic transducer elements.
  • microsonic waves are not highly collimated, or "beam-like," within liquid; and therefore efficiently couple into the geometry of the ultrasonic tank.
  • the application of microsonic frequencies to liquid occurs simultaneously with a sweeping of the microsonic frequency within the transducer's harmonic bandwidth. That is, microsonic transducers (clamped harmonic transducers) are most practical when there is a sweep rate of the applied microsonic frequency. This combination reduces or eliminates (a) standing waves within the liquid, (b) other resonances, (c) high energy cavitation implosions, and (d) non-uniform sound fields, each of which is undesirable for cleaning or processing semiconductor wafers and delicate parts.
  • the ultrasound transducers or arrays of the invention typically have a finite bandwidth associated with the range of frequencies about a resonant or harmonic frequency.
  • the transducers When driven at frequencies within the bandwidth, the transducers generate acoustic energy that is coupled into the liquid.
  • the invention drives the transducers such that the frequency of applied energy has a sweep rate within the bandwidth; and that sweep rate is also varied so that the sweep rate is substantially non-constant during operation.
  • the sweep rate can change linearly, randomly, or as some other function of time. In this manner, the invention reduces or eliminates resonances which are created by transducers operating with a single sweep rate, such as provided in the prior art.
  • At least one ultrasound generator of the invention utilizes amplitude modulation (AM).
  • AM amplitude modulation
  • this AM generator operates by selectively changing the AM frequency over time.
  • the AM frequency is swept through a range of frequencies which reduce or eliminate low frequency resonances within the liquid and the part being processed. Accordingly, the AM frequency is swept through a range of frequencies; and this range is typically defined as about 10-40% of the optimum AM frequency.
  • the optimum AM frequency is usually between about lhz and lOkhz. Therefore, for example, if the optimum AM frequency is lkhz, then the AM frequency is swept through a frequency range of between about 850hz and 1150hz.
  • the rate at which these frequencies are varied is usually less than about 1 / lOth of the optimum AM frequency.
  • the AM sweep rate is about lOOhz.
  • the invention provides AM control by selecting a portion of the rectified power line frequency (e.g., 60hz in the United States and 50hz in
  • this AM control is implemented by selecting a portion of the leading quarter sinusoid in a full wave amplitude modulation pattern that ends at the required amplitude in the zero to 90° and the 180° to 270° regions.
  • Another AM control is implemented by selecting a portion of the leading quarter sinusoid in a half wave amplitude modulation pattern that ends at the required amplitude in the zero to 90° region.
  • the invention can utilize several tanks, transducers and generators simultaneously to provide a wet bath of different chemistries for the delicate part.
  • the invention synchronizes their operation to a common FM signal so that each generator can be adjusted, through AM, to control the process characteristics within the associated tank.
  • a master generator provides a common FM signal to the other generators, each operating as a slave generator coupled to the master generator, and each slave generator provides AM selectively.
  • the FM control maintains overall synchronization even though varying AM is applied to the several transducers.
  • the multi-generator FM synchronization also applies to single tank ultrasonic systems. That is, the invention supports the synchronized operation of a plurality of generators that are connected to a single tank.
  • each generator has an associated harmonic transducer array and is driven with a common FM signal and AM signal so that the frequencies within the tank are synchronized, in amplitude and phase, to reduce or eliminate unwanted resonances which might otherwise occur through beating effects between the multiple generators and transducers.
  • the invention utilizes two or more transducers, in combination, to broaden the overall bandwidth of acoustical energy applied to the liquid around the primary frequency or one of the harmonics.
  • the invention of one aspect has two clamped transducers operating at their first, second third, or fourth harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
  • the center harmonic frequency of each is adjusted so as to be different from each other.
  • their bandwidths are made to overlap such that an attached generator can drive the transducers, in combination, to deliver ultrasound to the liquid in a broader bandwidth.
  • two or more transducers, or transducer arrays operate at unique harmonic frequencies and have finite bandwidths that overlap with each of the other transducers.
  • the invention provides a single tank system which selects a desired frequency, or range of frequencies, from a plurality of connected ultrasonic generators. Specifically, two or more generators, each operating or optimized to generate a range of frequencies, are connected to a mux; and the system selects the desired frequency range, and hence the right generator, according to the cavitation implosion energy that is desired within the tank chemistry.
  • the invention has additional and sometimes greater advantages in systems and methods which combine one or more of the features in the above paragraphs (1) through (7).
  • one particularly useful system combines two or more microsonic transducers (i.e., paragraph 1) to create broadband microsonics (i.e., paragraph 6) within liquid.
  • Such a system can further be controlled to provide a specific amplitude modulation (i.e., paragraph 4).
  • Other particularly advantageous systems and methods of the invention are realized with the following combinations: (2) and (4); (1), (2) and (4); and (1) and (2) with frequency sweeping of the microsonic frequency.
  • 4,743,789 and 4,736,130 provide particularly useful background in connection with ultrasonic generators that are suitable for use with certain aspects of the invention, and are, accordingly incorporated herein by reference.
  • Clamped ultrasonic transducers suitable for use with the invention are known in the art.
  • the following patents, each incorporated herein by reference, provide useful background to the invention: 3,066,232; 3,094,314; 3,113,761; 3,187,207; 3,230,403; 3,778,758; 3,804,329 and RE 25,433.
  • the invention provides a system for delivering broadband ultrasound to liquid.
  • the system includes first and second ultrasonic transducers.
  • the first transducer has a first frequency and a first ultrasound bandwidth
  • the second transducer has a second frequency and a second ultrasound bandwidth.
  • the first and second bandwidths are overlapping with each other and the first frequency is different from the second frequency.
  • An ultrasound generator drives the transducers at frequencies within the bandwidths.
  • the first and second transducers and the generator produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than either of the first and second bandwidths.
  • the system of the invention includes a third ultrasonic transducer that has a third frequency and a third ultrasound bandwidth.
  • the third bandwidth is overlapping with at least one of the other bandwidths, and the third frequency is different from the first and second frequencies.
  • the generator in this aspect drives the third transducer within the third bandwidth so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than any of the first, second and third bandwidths.
  • each of the transducers are clamped so as to resist material strain and fatigue.
  • each of the first and second frequencies are harmonic frequencies of the transducer's base resonant frequency. In one aspect, these harmonic frequencies are between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
  • the system includes at least one other synergistic ultrasonic transducer that has a synergistic frequency and a synergistic ultrasound bandwidth.
  • the synergistic bandwidth is overlapping with at least one of the other bandwidths, and the synergistic frequency is different from the first and second frequencies.
  • the generator drives the synergistic transducer within the synergistic bandwidth so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined 5 bandwidth that is greater than any of the other bandwidths.
  • this synergistic frequency is a harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
  • the bandwidths of combined transducers overlap so that, in combination, the transducers produce ultrasonic energy at substantially all frequencies within the combined bandwidth.
  • the combined operation i o provides ultrasound with relatively equal power for any frequency in the combined bandwidth.
  • the bandwidths preferably overlap such that the power at each frequency within the combined bandwidth is within a factor of two of ultrasonic energy produced at any other frequency within the combined bandwidth.
  • a system for delivering ttltrasound to liquid.
  • the system has an ultrasonic transducer with a harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz and within an ultrasound bandwidth.
  • a clamp applies compression to the transducer.
  • An ultrasound generator drives the transducer at a range of frequencies within the bandwidth so as to produce ultrasound within the
  • the system can include at least one other ultrasonic transducer that has a second harmonic frequency within a second bandwidth.
  • the second frequency is between about lOOkhz and 350khz, and the second bandwidth is overlapping, in frequency, with the ultrasound bandwidth.
  • 25 generator drives the transducers at frequencies within the bandwidths so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than the bandwidth of a single transducer.
  • Another aspect of the invention provides a system for delivering ultrasound to liquid.
  • one or more ultrasonic transducers have an operating
  • An ultrasound generator drives the transducers at frequencies within the bandwidth, and also changes the sweep rate of the frequency continuously so as to produce non-resonating ultrasound within the liquid.
  • the generator of the invention changes the sweep rate frequency in one of several ways.
  • the sweep rate is varied as a function of time.
  • the sweep rate is changed randomly.
  • the sweep rate frequency is changed through a range of frequencies that are between about 10-50% of the optimum sweep rate frequency.
  • the optimum sweep rate frequency is usually between about lhz and 1.2khz; and, therefore, the range of frequencies through winch the sweep rate is vaned can change dramatically
  • the optimum sweep rate is 500hz
  • the range of sweep rate frequencies is between about 400hz and 600hz; and the invention operates by varying the sweep rate within this range linearly, randomly, or as a function of time, so as to optimize processing characte ⁇ stics within the liquid
  • the invention further provides a system for delivering ultrasound to liquid.
  • This system includes one or more ultrasonic transducers, each having an operating frequency within an ultrasound bandwidth.
  • An amplitude modulated ultrasound generator drives the transducers at frequencies within the bandwidth.
  • a generator subsystem also changes the modulation frequency of the AM, continually, so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid to prevent low frequency resonances at the AM frequency
  • the subsystem sweeps the AM frequency at a sweep rate between about lhz and lOOhz.
  • the invention can further sweep the AM s ⁇ veep rate as a function of time so as to eliminate possible resonances which might be generated by the AM sweep rate frequency.
  • This sweeping of the AM sweep rate occurs for a range of AM sweep frequencies generally defined by 10-40% of the optimum AM sweep rate. For example, if the optimum AM sweep rate is 150hz, then one aspect of the invention changes the AM sweep rate through a range of about 130hz to 170hz
  • the invention also provides amplitude control through the power lines Specifically, amplitude modulation is achieved by selecting a portion of a leading quarter sinusoid, in a fall wave amplitude modulation pattern, that ends at a selected amplitude in a region between zero and 90° and between 180° and 270° of the sinusoid. Alternatively, amplitude control is achieved by selecting a portion of a leading quarter sinusoid, in a half wave amplitude modulation pattern, that ends at a selected amplitude between zero and 90° of the sinusoid.
  • a system of the invention can include two or more ultrasound generators that are synchronized in magnitude and phase so that there is substantially zero frequency difference between signals generated by the generators.
  • a timing signal is generated between the generators to synchronize the signals.
  • a FM generator provides a master frequency modulated signal to each generator to synchronize the signals from the generators.
  • a generator of the invention can also be frequency modulated over a range of frequencies within the bandwidth of each transducer.
  • the frequency modulation occurs over a range of frequencies within the bandwidth of each transducer, and the generator is amplitude modulated over a range of frequencies within the bandwidth of each transducer.
  • the systems of the invention generally include a chamber for holding the solution or liquid which is used to clean or process objects therein.
  • the chamber can include, for example, material such as 316L stainless steel, 304 stainless steel, polytetrafluoroethylene, fluorinated ethylene propylene, polyvinylidine fluoride, perfluoroalkoxy, polypropylene, polyetheretherketone, tantalum, teflon coated stainless steel, titanium, hastalloy, and mixtures thereof.
  • the transducers of the system include an array of ultrasound transducer elements.
  • the invention also provides a method of delivering broadband ultrasound to liquid, including the steps of: driving a first ultiasound transducer with a generator at a first frequency and within a first ultrasound bandwidth, and driving a second ultrasound transducer with the generator at a second frequency within a second ultrasound bandwidth that overlaps at least part of the first bandwidth, such that the first and second transducers, in combination with the generator, produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than either of the first and second bandwidths.
  • the method includes the step of compressing at least one of the transducers, and/ or the step of driving the first and second transducers at harmonic frequencies between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
  • the method includes the step of arranging the bandwidths to overlap so that the transducers and generator produce ultrasonic energy, at each frequency, that is within a factor of two of ultrasonic energy produced by the transducers and generator at any other frequency within the combined bandwidth.
  • the application of broadband ultrasound has certain advantages. First, it increases the useful bandwidth of multiple transducer assemblies so that the advantages to sweeping ultrasound are enhanced.
  • the broadband ultrasound also gives more ultrasonic intensity for a given power level because there are additional and different frequencies spaced further apart in the ultrasomc bath at any one time. Therefore, there is less sound energy cancellation because only frequencies of the same wavelength, the same amplitude and opposite phase cancel effectively
  • the method of the invention includes the step of driving an ultrasonic transducer in a first bandwidth of harmonic frequencies centered about a microsonic frequency in the range of lOOkhz and 350khz For protection, the transducer is preferably compressed to protect its integrity.
  • Another method of the invention provides the following steps: coupling one or more ultrasonic transducers to the liquid, driving, with a generator, the transducers to an operating frequency within an ultrasound bandwidth, the transducers and generator generating ultrasound within the liquid, changing the frequency within the bandwidth at a sweep rate, and continuously varying the sweep rate as a function of time so as to reduce low frequency resonances.
  • the sweep rate is varied according to one of the following steps: sweeping the sweep rate as a function of time; linearly sweeping the sweep rate as a function of time, and randomly sweeping the sweep rate.
  • the optimum sweep frequency is between about lhz and 1.2khz, and therefore, in other aspects, the methods of the invention change the sweep rate within a range of sweep frequencies centered about an optimum sweep frequency. Typically, this range is defined by about 10-50% of the optimum sweep frequency. For example, if the optimum sweep frequency is 800hz, then the range of sweep frequencies is between about 720hz and 880hz. Further, and in another aspect, the rate at which the invention sweeps the sweep rate within this range is varied at less than about 1 / 10th of the optimum frequency. Therefore, in this example, the invention changes the sweep rate at a rate that is less than about 80hz.
  • Another method of the invention provides for the steps of (a) generating a drive signal for one or more ultrasonic transducers, each having an operating frequency within an ultrasound bandwidth, (b) amplitude modulating the drive signal at a modulation frequency, and (c) sweeping the modulation frequency, selectively, as to produce ultrasound within the liquid.
  • the invention is particularly useful as an ultrasonic system which couples acoustic energy into a liquid for purposes of cleaning parts, developing photosensitive polymers, and stripping material from surfaces.
  • the invention can provide many sound frequencies to the liquid by sweeping the sound through the bandwidth of the transducers.
  • the standing waves causing cavitation hot spots in the liquid are reduced or eliminated; part resonances within the liquid at ultrasonic frequencies are reduced or eliminated; and the ultrasonic activity in the liquid builds up to a higher intensity because there is less cancellation of sound waves.
  • the invention provides an ultrasonic bath with transducers having at least two different resonant frequencies.
  • the resonant frequencies are made so that the bandwidths of the transducers overlap and so that the impedance versus frequency curve for the paralleled transducers exhibit maximum flatness in the resonant region. For example, when a 40khz transducer with a 4.1khz bandwidth is put in parallel - i.e., with overlapping bandwidths - with a 44khz transducer with a 4.2khz bandwidth, the resultant bandwidth of the multiple transducer assembly is about 8 khz. If transducers with three different frequencies are used, the bandwidth is approximately three times the bandwidth of a single transducer.
  • a clamped transducer array is provided with a resonant frequency of 40khz and a bandwidth of 4 khz.
  • the array has a second harmonic resonant frequency at 104khz with a 4khz harmonic bandwidth.
  • the bandwidth of this second harmonic frequency resonance is increased by the methods described above for the fundamental frequency of a clamped transducer array.
  • the invention provides a method and associated circuitry which constantly changes the sweep rate of an ultrasonic transducer within a range of values that is in an optimum process range.
  • one exemplary process can have an optimum sweep rate in the range 380hz to 530hz.
  • this sweep rate constantly changes within the 380hz to 530hz range so that the sweep rate does not set up resonances within the tank and set up a resonance at that rate.
  • the invention provides for several methods to change the sweep rate. One of the most effective methods is to generate a random change in sweep rate within the specified range. A simpler method is to sweep the sweep rate at some given function of time, e.g., linearly.
  • the sweeping function of time has a specific frequency which may itself cause a resonance. Accordingly, one aspect of the invention is to sweep this time function; however, in practice, the time function has a specific frequency lower than the lowest resonant frequency of the semiconductor wafer or delicate part, so there is little need to eliminate that specific frequency.
  • ultrasonic systems are amplitude modulated at a low frequency, typically 50 hz, 60hz, lOOhz, or 120hz.
  • One ultrasonic generator the proSONIKTM sold by Ney Ultrasonics Inc., and produced according to U. S. Patent No. 4,736,130, permits the generation of a specific amplitude modulation pattern that is typically between 50hz to 5khz.
  • the specific amplitude modulation frequency can itself be a cause of low frequency resonance in an ultrasonic bath if the selected amplitude modulation frequency is a resonant frequency of the delicate part.
  • one aspect of the invention solves the problem of delicate part resonance at the amplitude modulation frequency by randomly changing or sweeping the frequency of the amplitude modulation within a bandwidth of amplitude modulation frequencies that satisfy the process specifications. For cases where substantially all of the low frequencies must be eliminated, random changes of the modulation frequency are preferred. For cases where there are no resonances in a part below a specified frequency, the amplitude modulation frequency can be swept at a frequency below the specified frequency.
  • Random changing or sweeping of the amplitude modulation frequency inhibits low frequency resonances because there is little repetitive energy at a frequency within the resonant range of the delicate part or semiconductor wafer.
  • the invention also provides relatively inexpensive amplitude control as compared to the prior art.
  • One aspect of the invention provides amplitude control with a full wave or half wave amplitude modulated ultrasonic signal.
  • full wave a section of the 0° to 90° and the 180° to 270° quarter sinusoid is chosen which ends at the required (desired) amplitude.
  • a monostable multivibrator is triggered at the zero crossover of the half sinusoid (0° and 180°). It is set to time out before 90° duration, and specifically at the required amplitude value. This timed monostable multivibrator pulse is used to select that section of the quarter sinusoid that never exceeds the required amplitude.
  • the invention also provides an adjustable ultrasonic generator.
  • This generator is that the sweep rate frequency and the amplitude modulation pattern frequency are randomly changed or swept within the optimum range for a selected process.
  • the generator drives an expanded bandwidth clamped piezoelectric transducer array at a harmonic frequency from lOOkhz to 350khz.
  • Such a generator provides several improvements in the problematic areas affecting lower frequency ultrasonics and megasonics: uncontrolled cavitation implosion, unwanted resonances, unreliable transducers, and standing waves.
  • the system of the invention provides uniform microstreaming that is critical to semiconductor wafer and other delicate part processing and cleaning.
  • an array of transducers is used to transmit sound into a liquid at its fundamental frequency, e.g., 40khz, and at each harmonic frequency, e.g., 72khz or 104khz.
  • the outputs of generators which have the transducer resonant frequencies and harmonic frequencies are connected through relays to the transducer array.
  • One generator with the output frequency that most closely producers the optimum energy in each cavitation implosion for the current process chemistry is switched to the transducer array.
  • the invention reduces or eliminates low frequency beat resonances created by multiple generators by synchronizing the sweep rates (both in magnitude and in phase) so that there is zero frequency difference between the signals coming out of multiple generators.
  • the synchronization of sweep rate magnitude and phase is accomplished by sending a timing signal from one generator to each of the other generators.
  • a master FM signal is generated that is sent to each "slave" power module, which amplifies the master FM signal for delivery to the transducers.
  • the master and slave aspect of the invention also provides advantages in eliminating or reducing the beat frequency created by multiple generators driving a single tank.
  • the master control of the invention has a single FM function generator (sweeping frequency signal) and multiple AM function generators, one for each tank. Thus, every tank in the system receives the same magnitude and phase of sweep rate, but a different AM as set on the control for each generator.
  • the invention also provides other advantages as compared to the prior art's methods for frequency sweeping ultrasound within the transducer's bandwidth. Specifically, the invention provides a sweeping of the sweep rate, within the transducer's bandwidth, such that low frequency resonances are reduced or eliminated.
  • Prior art frequency sweep systems had a fixed sweep frequency that is selectable, once, for a given application.
  • One problem with such prior art systems is that the single low frequency can set up a resonance in a delicate part, for example, a read-write head for a hard disk drive.
  • the invention also provides advantages in that the sweep frequency of the sweep rate can be adjusted to conditions within the tank, or to the configuration of the tank or transducer, or even to a process chemistry.
  • the invention also has certain advantages over prior art single chamber ultrasound systems. Specifically, the methods of the invention, in certain aspects, use different frequency ultrasonics for each different chemistry so that the same optimum energy in each cavitation implosion is maintained in each process or cleaning chemistry. According to other aspects of the invention, this process is enhanced by selecting the proper ultrasonic generator frequency that is supplied at the fundamental or harmonic frequency of the transducers bonded to the single ultiasonic chamber.
  • Figure 1 shows a cut-away side view schematic of an ultrasound processing system constructed according to the invention
  • Figure 1A shows a top view schematic of the system of Figure 1;
  • Figure 2 shows a schematic illustration of a multi-transducer system constructed according to the invention and used to generate broadband ultrasound in a combined bandwidth;
  • Figure 2A graphically illustrates the acoustic disturbances produced by the two transducers of Figure 2;
  • Figure 2B graphically illustrates the broadband acoustic disturbances produced by harmonics of a multi-transducer system constructed according to the invention;
  • Figure 3 shows a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a system constructed according to the invention
  • Figure 4 shows a schematic embodiment of the signal section of the system of Figure 3;
  • Figure 5 shows a schematic embodiment of the power module section of the system of Figure 3
  • Figure 6 is a cross-sectional side view of a harmonic transducer constructed according to the invention and driven by the power module of Figure 5
  • Figure 6A is a top view of the harmonic transducer of Figure 6;
  • Figure 7 is a schematic illustration of an amplitude control subsystem constructed according to the invention
  • Figure 7A shows illustrative amplitude control signals generated by an amplitude control subsystem such as in Figure 7;
  • FIG 8 shows a schematic illustration of an AM sweep subsystem constructed according to the invention
  • Figure 8A shows a typical AM frequency generated by an AM generator
  • Figure 8B graphically shows AM sweep frequency as a function of time for a representative sweep rate, in accord with the invention
  • Figure 9 illustrates a multi-generator, multi-frequency, single tank ultrasound system constructed according to the invention
  • Figure 9A illustrates another multi- generator, single tank system constructed according to the invention
  • Figure 10 illustrates a multi-generator, common-frequency, single tank ultrasound system constructed according to the invention
  • Figure 11 illustrates a multi-tank ultrasound system constructed according to the invention
  • Figure HA shows representative AM waveform patterns as controlled through the system of Figure 11;
  • Figures 12A, 12B and 12C graphically illustrate methods of sweeping the sweep rate in accord with the invention.
  • FIGS 1 and 1A show schematic side and top views, respectively, of an ultrasound processing system 10 constructed according to the invention.
  • An ultrasonic generator 12 electrically connects, via electrical paths 14a, 14b, to an ultrasound transducer 16 to drive the transducer 16 at ultrasound frequencies above about l ⁇ khz, and usually between 40khz and 350khz.
  • the transducer 16 is shown in Figure 1 as an array of transducer elements 18. Typically, such elements 18 are made from ceramic, piezoelectric, or magnetostrictive materials which expand and contract with applied voltages or current to create ultrasound.
  • the transducer 16 is mounted to the bottom, to the sides, or within the ultrasound treatment tank 20 through conventional methods, such as known to those skilled in the art and as described above.
  • a liquid 22 fills the tank to a level sufficient to cover the delicate part 24 to be processed and /or cleaned.
  • the generator 12 drives the transducer 16 to create acoustic energy 26 that couples into the liquid 22.
  • transducer 16 is shown mounted to the bottom of the tank 20, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other mounting configurations are possible and envisioned.
  • the transducer elements 18 are of conventional design, and are preferably “clamped” so as to compress the piezoelectric transducer material.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a two transducer system 30.
  • Transducer 32a, 32b are similar to one of the elements 18, Figure 1.
  • Transducer 32a includes two ceramic sandwiched elements 34, a steel back plate 38a, and a front drive plate 36a that is mounted to the tank 20'.
  • Transducer 32b includes two ceramic sandwiched elements 34, a steel back plate 38b, and a front drive plate 36b that is mounted to the tank 20'.
  • Bolts 39a, 39b pass through the plates 38a, 38b and screw into the drive plates 36a, 36b, respectively, to compresses the ceramics 34.
  • the transducers 32 are illustratively shown mounted to a tank surface 20'.
  • the transducers 32a, 32b are driven by a common generator such as generator 12 of Figure 1. Alternatively, multiple generators can be used.
  • the ceramics 34 are oriented with positive "+" orientations together or minus "-" orientations together to obtain cooperative expansion and contraction within each transducer 32.
  • Lead-outs 42 illustrate the electrical connections which connect between the generator and the transducers 32 so as to apply a differential voltage there-across.
  • the bolts 39a, 39b provide a conduction path between the bottoms 43 and tops 45 of the transducers 32 to connect the similar electrodes (here shown as -, -) of the elements 34.
  • transducer 32a has a fundamental frequency of 40khz
  • transducer 32b has a fundamental frequency of 44khz.
  • Transducers 32a, 32b each have a finite ultrasound bandwidth which can be adjusted, slightly, by those skilled in the art. Typically, however, the bandwidths are about 4khz. By choosing the correct fundamental frequencies, therefore, an overlap between the bandwidths of the two transducers 32a, 32b can occur, thereby adding additional range within which to apply ultrasound 26a', 26b' to liquid 22'.
  • the acoustic energy 26' applied to the liquid 22' by the combination of transducers 32a, 32b is illustrated graphically in Figure 2A.
  • the "x" axis represents frequency
  • the "y" axis represents acoustical power.
  • the outline 44 represents the bandwidth of transducer 32a
  • outline 46 represents the bandwidth of transducer 32b. Together, they produce a combined bandwidth 43 which produces a relatively flat acoustical energy profile to the liquid 22', such as illustrated by profile 48.
  • the flatness of the bandwidth 43 representing the acoustical profile 48 of the two transducers 32a, 32b is preferably within a factor of two of any other acoustical strength within the combined bandwidth 43. That is, if the FWHM defines the bandwidth 43; the non-uniformity in the profile 48 across the bandwidth 43 is typically better than this amount.
  • the profile 48 between the two bandwidths 44 and 46 is substantially flat, such as illustrated in Figure 2A.
  • the generator connected to lead-outs 42 drives the transducers 32a, 32b at frequencies within the bandwidth 43 to obtain broadband acoustical disturbances within the liquid 22'.
  • the manner in which these frequencies are varied to obtain the overall disturbance is important.
  • the generator sweeps the frequencies through the overall bandwidth, and at the same time sweeps the rate at which those frequencies are changed. That is, one preferred generator of the invention has a "sweep rate" that sweeps through the frequencies within the bandwidth 43; and that sweep rate is itself varied as a function of time.
  • the sweep rate is varied linearly, randomly, and as some other function of time to optimize the process conditions within the tank 20'.
  • each of the elements 18 can have a representative bandwidth such as illustrated in Figure 2A. Accordingly, an even larger bandwidth 43 can be created with three or more transducers such as illustrated by transducers 32a, 32b. In particular, any number of combined transducers can be used. Preferably, the bandwidths of all the combined transducers overlap to provide an integrated bandwidth such as profile 48 of Figure 2A. As such, each transducer making up the combined bandwidth should have a unique resonant frequency.
  • each of the transducers 18 and 32a, 32b, Figures 1 and 2A, respectively have harmonic frequencies which occur at higher mechanical resonances of the primary resonant frequency. It is one preferred embodiment of the invention that such transducers operate at one of these harmonics, i.e., typically the first, second, third or fourth harmonic, so as to function in the frequency range of lOOkhz to 350khz.
  • This frequency range provides a more favorable environment for acoustic processes within the tanks 20, 20' as compared to low frequency disturbances less than lOOkhz. For example, ultrasound frequencies around the 40khz frequency can easily cause cavitation damage in the part 24.
  • Figure 2B illustrates a combined bandwidth 50 of harmonic frequencies in the range 100-350khz. Specifically, Figure 2B shows the combined bandwidth 50 that is formed by the bandwidth 44' around the second harmonic of the 40Khz frequency, and the bandwidth 46' around the second harmonic of the 41.5khz frequency.
  • FIG. 3 shows in block diagram embodiment of a system 110 constructed according to the present invention.
  • the system 110 includes a signal section 112 which drives a power module 121.
  • the power module 121 powers the harmonic transducer array 122.
  • the transducer array 122 are coupled to a liquid 123 by one of several conventional means so as to generate acoustic energy within the liquid 123.
  • the array 122 is similar to the array 16 of Figure 1; and the liquid 123 is similar to the liquid 22 of Figure 1.
  • the signal section 112 includes a triangle wave oscillator 114 with a frequency typically below 150 hz.
  • the purpose of the oscillator 114 is to provide a signal that sweeps the sweep rate of the ultrasound frequencies generated by the transducer arrays 122.
  • the oscillator 114 is fed into the input of the sweep rate VCO 115 (Voltage Controlled Oscillator). This causes the frequency of the output of VCO 115 to linearly sweep at the frequency of the oscillator 114
  • the optimum sweep rate frequency output of VCO 115 is typically from about lOhz, for magnetostrictive elements, to about 1.2khz, for piezoelect ⁇ cs.
  • the optimum center sweep rate frequency can be anywhere within the range of about lOhz to 1.2khz, and that sweep rate is varied within a finite range of frequencies about the center sweep frequency. This finite range is typically set to about 10-50% of the center sweep rate frequency.
  • the center sweep rate frequency for one process might be 455hz, so the VCO 115 output is set, for example, to sweep from 380 hz to 530 hz. If, additionally, the oscillator 114 is set to 37hz, then the output of VCO 115 changes frequency, linearly, from 380hz to 530hz, and back to 380hz at thirty seven times per second
  • the output of VCO 115 feeds the VCO input of the 2 X center frequency VCO 116.
  • the VCO 116 operates as follows. If, for example, the center frequency of VCO 116 is set to 208khz and the bandwidth is set to 8khz, the center frequency linearly changes from 204khz to 212khz and back to 212khz in a time of 1.9 milliseconds (i.e., l/530hz) to 2.63 milliseconds (i.e., l /380hz) The specific time is determined by the voltage output of the oscillator 114 at the time of measurement.
  • the time it takes to linearly sweep the center frequency from 204khz to 212khz and back to 204khz is also constantly changing. In this example, the time changes linearly from 1.9ms to 2.63ms and back to 1.9ms at thirty seven times per second.
  • the oscillator 114, VCO 115 and VCO 116 operate, in combination, to 5 eliminate the repetition of a single sweep rate frequency in the range of lOhz to
  • the oscillator 114 would be replaced by a random voltage generator to reduce the hklihood of exciting any modes within o the part.
  • the VCO 116 drives a divide-by-two D flip-flop 117.
  • the purpose of the D flip-flop 117 is to eliminate asymmetries in the waveform from the VCO 116
  • the output of the D flip-flop 117 is thus a square wave that has the desired frequency which changes at a sweep rate that is itself sweeping.
  • the output square wave from D flip-flop 117 linearly changes from 102khz to 106khz and back to 102khz at different times in the range of 1.9ms to 2.63ms. This sweeping of the sweep rate is sometimes referred to herein as "double sweep” or "double sweeping.”
  • the AC line zero-crossover detection circuit 118 produces a signal with a rise time or narrow pulse at or near the time that the AC line voltage is at zero or at a low voltage, i.e., at or near zero degrees. This signal triggers the adjustable monstable multivibrator 119.
  • the timed pulse out of monostable multivibrator 119 is set to a value between zero degrees and ninety degrees, which corresponds to a time from zero to 4.17ms for a 60hz line frequency.
  • the monostable multivibrator 119 is set to a time of 4.17ms for a 60hz line frequency. For an amplitude that is 50% of maximum, the monostable multivibrator 119 is set to 1.389ms for a 60hz line frequency. In general, the monostable multivibrator 119 time is set to the arcsin of the amplitude percent times the period of the line frequency divided by 360 degrees.
  • the synchronization logic 120 performs three primary functions. First, it only allows the double sweeping square wave to pass to the output of the synchronization logic 120 during the time defined by the pulse from the monostable multivibrator 119. Second, the synchronization logic 20 always allows a double sweeping square wave which starts to be completed, even if the monostable multivibrator 19 times out in the middle of a double sweeping square wave . And lastly, the synchronization logic 120 always starts a double sweeping square wave at the beginning of the ultrasonic frequency, i.e., at zero degrees.
  • the output of synchronization logic 120 is a double sweeping square wave that exists only during the time defined by the monostable multivibrator 119 or for a fraction of a cycle past the end of the monostable multivibrator 119 time period.
  • the synchronization logic 120 output feeds a power module 121 which amplifies the pulsed double sweeping square wave to an appropriate power level to drive the harmonic transducers 122.
  • the transducers 122 are typically bonded to a tank and deliver sound waves into the liquid within the tank. These sound waves duplicate the pulsed double sweeping characteristics of the output of the signal section 112.
  • Figure 4 shows a schematic embodiment of the signal section 112 in Figure 3.
  • Ul is a XR-2209 precision oscillator with a triangle wave output at pin 8.
  • the other components associated with the XR-2209 are the standard configuration for single supply operation of this integrated circuit.
  • U2 is a XR-2209 precision oscillator with a triangle wave output at pin8.
  • U3 pin7 has a square wave output that is changing from 204khz to 212khz and back to 204khz at a rate between 380hz and 530hz.
  • the actual rate is constantly changing thirty seven times a second as determined by Ul.
  • U4 is a D flip-flop in a standard divide by two configuration. It squares up any non 50% duty cycle from U3 and provides a frequency range of 102khz to 106khz from the 204khz to 212khz U3 signal.
  • the output of U4 feeds the synchronization logic which is described below and after the description of the generation of the amplitude control signal.
  • the two 1N4002 diodes in conjunction with the bridge rectifier form a full wave half sinusoid signal at the input to the 40106 Schmidt trigger inverter.
  • This inventor triggers when the half sinusoid reaches about 7volts, which on a half sinusoid with an amplitude of 16 times the square root of two is close enough to the zero crossover for a trigger point in a practical circuit.
  • the output of the 40106 Schmidt trigger falls which triggers U5, the edge triggered 4538 monostable multivibrator wired in a trailing edge trigger/ retriggerable configuration.
  • the output of U5 goes high for a period determined by the setting on the 500k ⁇ potentiometer. At the end of this period, the output of U5 goes low.
  • the period is chosen by setting the 500k ⁇ potentiometer to select that portion of the leading one- quarter sinusoid that ends at the required amplitude to give amplitude control. This timed positive pulse feeds into the synchronization logic along with the square wave output of U4.
  • the timed pulse U5 feeds the D input of U6, a 4013 D-type flip flop.
  • the square wave from U4 is invented by U7a and feeds the clock input of U6.
  • U6 only transfers the signal on the D input to the output Q at the rise of a pulse on the clock input, Pin3. Therefore, the Q output of U6 on Pinl is high when the D input of U6 on Pin3 is high and the clock input of U6 on Pin3 transitions high. This change in the Q output of U6 is therefore synchronized with the change in the square wave from U4.
  • the synchronized high Q output of U6 feeds U8 Pinl3, a 4093 Schmidt trigger NAND gate.
  • the high level on Pinl3 of U8 allows the square wave signal to pass from U8 Pinl2 to the output of U8 at Pinll.
  • U8 synchronizes the falling output from U5 with the square wave from U4. Therefore, only complete square waves pass to U8 Pinll and only during the time period as chosen by monostable multivibrator U5.
  • the 4049 buffer driver U7b inverts the output at U8 Pinll so it has the same phase as the square wave output from U4. This signal, U7b Pin2 is now the proper signal to be amplified to drive the transducers.
  • Figure 5 is a circuit that increases the signal from U7b Pin 2 in Figure 4 to a power level for driving the transducers 122, Figure 3.
  • the second and third isolated power supplies produce +15 VDC at VR2 Pin3 and VR3 Pin3 for gate drive to the IGBT's (insulated gate bipolar transistors).
  • the signal input to Figure 5 has its edges sharpened by the 40106 Schmidt trigger U9a.
  • the output of U9a feeds the 4049 buffer drivers UlOc and UlOd which drive optical isolator and IGBT driver U12, a Hewlett Packard HCPL3120.
  • the output of U9a is inverted by U9b and feeds buffer drivers UlOa and UlOb which drive Ull, another HCPL3120.
  • the power signal across Cl couples through the high frequency isolation transformer T4.
  • the output of T4 is connected to the transducer or transducer array.
  • Figure 6 shows a cross-sectional side view of one clamped microsonic transducer 128 constructed according to the invention; while Figure 6A shows a top view of the microsonic transducer 128.
  • the microsonic transducer 128 has a second harmonic resonant frequency of 104khz with a 4khz bandwidth (i.e., from 102khz to 106khz).
  • the cone-shaped backplate 139 flattens the impedance verses frequency curve to broaden the frequency bandwidth of the microsonic transducer 128.
  • the backplate thickness along the "T" direction changes for translational positions along direction "X." Since the harmonic resonance of the microsonic transducer 128 changes as a function of backplate thickness, the conical plate 139 broadens and flattens the microsonic transducer's operational bandwidth.
  • the ceramic 134 of microsonic transducer 128 is driven through oscillatory voltages transmitted across the electrodes 136.
  • the electrodes 136 connect to an ultrasonic generator (not shown), such as described above, by insulated electrical connections 138.
  • the ceramic 134 is held under compression through operation of the bolt 132. Specifically, the bolt 132 provides 5,000 pounds of compressive force on the piezoelectric ceramic 134.
  • Amplitude control according to one embodiment of the invention is illustrated in Figures 7 and 7A.
  • Figure 7 shows an amplitude control subsystem 140 that provides amplitude control by selecting a portion of the rectified line voltage 145 which drives the ultrasonic generator amplitude select section 146.
  • the amplitude control subsystem 140 operates with the ultiasonic generator 142 and connects with the power line voltage 138.
  • the rectification section 144 changes the ac to dc so as to provide the rectified signal 145.
  • the amplitude select section 146 selects a portion of the leading quarter sinusoid of rectified signal 145 that ends at the desired amplitude, here shown as amplitude "A,” in a region 148 between zero and 90° and in a region 150 between 180° and 270° of the signal 145. In this manner, the amplitude modulation 152 is selectable in a controlled manner as applied to the signal 154 driving the transducers
  • FIG. 7A shows illustrative selections of amplitude control in accord with the invention.
  • the AC line 158 is first converted to a full wave signal 160 by the rectifier 144.
  • the amplitude select section 146 acquires the signal amplitude selectively. For example, by selecting the maximum amplitude of 90° in the first quarter sinusoid, and 270° in the third quarter sinusoid, a maximum amplitude signal 162 is provided.
  • a one-half amplitude signal 164 is generated by choosing the 30° and 210° locations of the same sinusoids.
  • a one-third amplitude signal 166 is generated by choosing 19.5° and
  • the rectification section 144 can also be a half-wave rectifier. As such, the signal 145 will only have a response every other one-half cycle. In this case, amplitude control is achieved by selecting a portion of the leading quarter sinusoid that ends at a selected amplitude between zero and
  • the ultrasonic generator of the invention is preferably amplitude modulated.
  • various process characteristics within the tank can be optimized.
  • the AM control can be implemented such as described in Figures 3,4,7 and 7A, or through other prior art techniques such as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,736,130.
  • This "sweeping" of the AM frequency is accomplished in a manner that is similar to ultrasonic generators which sweep the frequency within the bandwidth of an ultrasonic transducer.
  • U.S. Patent No. 4,736,130 describes one ultrasonic generator which provides variable selection of the AM frequency through sequential "power burst” generation and “quiet time” during a power train time.
  • the AM frequency is changed to "sweep" the frequency in a pattern so as to provide an AM sweep rate pattern.
  • FIG 8 illustrates an AM sweep subsystem 170 constructed according to the invention.
  • the AM sweep subsystem 170 operates as part of, or in conjunction with, the ultrasonic generator 172.
  • the AM generator 174 provides an AM signal 175 with a selectable frequency.
  • the increment/ decrement section 176 commands the AM generator 174 over command line 177 to change its frequency over a preselected time period so as to "sweep" the AM frequency in the output signal 178 which drives the transducers 180.
  • Figure 8B illustrates a graph of AM frequency versus time for this example.
  • FIG 9 schematically illustrates a multi-generator, single tank system 200 5 constructed according to the invention.
  • an ultrasound frequency 201 that most closely achieves the cavitation implosion energy which cleans, but does not damage, the delicate part 202.
  • the chemistries within the tank 210 are changed, from time to time, so that the desired or optimum ultrasound frequency changes.
  • the transducers o and generators of the prior art do not operate or function at all frequencies, so system 200 has multiple generators 206 and transducers 208 that provide different frequencies.
  • generator 206a can provide a 40khz primary resonant frequency; while generator 206b can provide the first harmonic 72khz frequency.
  • Generator 206c can provide, for example, 104khz microsonic operation. 5 In the illustrated example, therefore, the generators 206a, 206b, 206c operate, respectively, at 40khz, 72khz, and 104khz. Each transducer 208 responds at each of these frequencies so that, in tandem, the transducers generate ultrasound 201 at the same frequency to fill the tank 210 with the proper frequency for the particular chemistry.
  • each of the generators 206a-206c can and do preferably sweep the frequencies about the transducers' bandwidth centered about the frequencies 40khz, 72khz, and 104khz, respectively; and they further sweep the sweep rate within these bandwidths to reduce or eliminate resonances which might occur at the optimum sweep rate. 5
  • the operator selects the optimum frequency through the mux select section 212.
  • the mux select section connects to the analog multiplexer ("mux") 214 which connects to each generator 206.
  • each generator 206 couples through the mux 214 in a switching network that permits only one active signal line 216 to the transducers 208.
  • generator 206c is connected through the mux 214 and drives each transducer 208a-208c to generate microsonic ultrasound 201 which fills the tank 210. If, however, generator 206a is selected, then each of the transducers 208 are driven with 40khz ultrasound.
  • FIG 9A illustrates another single tank, multi-generator system 200' constructed according to the invention.
  • each of the generators 206' provides a different frequency.
  • each generator 206' connects to drive unique transducer arrays 208' within the tank 210'.
  • generator 206a' is selected to generate 40khz ultrasound 201a in the tank 210'
  • generator 206b' is selected to generate 72khz ultrasound 201b in the tank 210'
  • generator 206c is selected to generate 104khz microsonics 201c in the tank 210'.
  • generator/ transducer pairs 206a'/208a', 206b'/208b' and 206c' / 208c' do not generally operate at the same time; but rather are selected according to the process chemistries and part 202' in the tank 210'.
  • each of the generators 206 can be replaced by multiple generators operating at the same or similar frequency. This is sometimes needed to provide additional power to the tank 210 at the desired frequency.
  • the mux 214 can be designed in several known methods, and that techniques to do so abound in the art.
  • Figure 10 illustrates a multi-generator, common frequency ultrasound system
  • a plurality of generators 232 connect through signal lines 234 (234a-234c) to drive associated transducers 238 (238a-238c) in a common tank 236.
  • Each of the transducers 238 and generators 232 operate at the same frequency, and are preferably swept through a range of frequencies such as described above so as to reduce or eliminate resonances within the tank 236 (and within the part 242).
  • the generators 232 are each driven by a common FM signal 250 such as generated by the master signal generator 244.
  • the FM signal is coupled to each generator through signal divider 251.
  • system 230 permits the coupling of identical frequencies, in amplitude and phase, into the tank 236 by the several transducers 238. Accordingly, unwanted beating effects are eliminated.
  • the signal 250 is swept with FM control through the desired ultrasound bandwidth of the several transducers to eliminate resonances within the tank 236; and that sweep rate frequency is preferably swept to eliminate any low frequency resonances which can result from the primary sweep frequency.
  • system 230 of Figure 10 can additionally include or employ other features such as described herein, such as AM modulation and sweep, AM control, and broadband transducer.
  • FIG 11 illustrates a multi-tank system 260 constructed according to the invention.
  • One or more generators 262 drive each tank 264 (here illustrated, generators 262a and 262b drive tank 264a; and generators 264c and 264d drive tank 264b).
  • Each of the generators 262 connects to an associated ultrasound transducer 266a-d so as to produce ultrasound 268a-d in the associated tanks 264a-b.
  • the common master signal generator 270 provides a common FM signal 272 for each of the generators 262. Thereafter, ultrasound generators 262a-b generate ultrasound 268a-b that is identical in amplitude and phase, such as described above. Similarly, generators 262c-d generate ultrasound 268c-d that is identical in amplitude and phase. However, unlike above, the generators 262 each have an AM generator 274 that functions as part of the generator 262 so as to select an optimum AM frequency within the tanks 264. In addition, the AM generators 274 preferably sweep through the AM frequencies so as to eliminate resonances at the AM frequency.
  • generators 274a-b generate and / or sweep through identical frequencies of the AM in tank 264a; while generators 274c-d generate and /or sweep through identical frequencies of AM in tank 264b.
  • the AM frequency and /or AM sweep of the paired generators 274a-b need not be the same as the AM frequency and /or AM sweep of the paired generators 274c-d.
  • Each of the generators 274 operate at the same carrier frequency as determined by the FM signal 270; however each paired generator set 274a-b and 274c-d operates independently from the other set so as to create the desired process characteristics within the associated tank 264.
  • the system 260 eliminates or prevents undesirable cross-talk or resonances between the two tanks 264a-b. Since the generators within all tanks 264 operate at the same signal frequency 270, there is no effective beating between tanks which could upset or destroy the desired cleaning and /or processing characteristics within the tanks 264. As such, the system 260 reduces the likelihood of creating damaging resonances within the parts 280a-b. It is apparent to those skilled in the art that the FM control 270 can contain the four AM controls 274a-d instead of the illustrated configuration.
  • FIG 11 A shows two AM patterns 300a, 300b that illustrate ultrasound delivered to multiple tanks such as shown in Figure 11.
  • AM pattern 300a represents the ultrasound 268a of Figurell
  • AM pattern 300b represents the ultrasound 268c of Figure 11.
  • the ultrasound frequencies 302 can be synchronized so as to eliminate beating between tanks 264a, 264b.
  • the separate AM generators 274a and 274c provide capability so as to select the magnitude of the AM frequency shown by the envelope waveform 306.
  • waveform 306a has a different magnitude 308 as compared to the magnitude 310 of waveform 306b.
  • generators 374a, 374c can change the periods 310a, 310b, respectively, of each of the waveforms 306a, 306b selectively so as to change the AM frequency within each tank.
  • Figures 12A, 12B and 12C graphically illustrate the methods of sweeping the sweep rate, in accord with the invention.
  • Figure 12A shows an illustrative condition of a waveform 350 that has a center frequency of 40khz and that is varied about the center frequency so as to "sweep" the frequency as a function of time along the time axis 352.
  • Figure 12B illustrates FM control of the waveform 354 which has a varying period 356 specified in terms of time. For example, a 42khz period occurs in 23.8 ⁇ s while a 40khz period occurs in 25 ⁇ s.
  • the regions 358a, 358b are shown for ease of illustration and represent, respectively, compressed periods of time within which the system sweeps the waveform 354 through many frequencies from 42khz to 40khz, and through many frequencies from 40khz to 38khz.
  • Figure 12c graphically shows a triangle pattern 360 which illustrates the variation of sweep rate frequency along a time axis 362. Appendix A contains, for disclosure purposes, additional detail and combinations of the invention as presented in claims A1-A77.

Abstract

Clamped ultrasonic transducers are driven at harmonic resonant frequencies in a range of 100 kHz - 350 kHz to impart microsonic frequencies to process liquid. The application of microsonic frequencies to liquid preferably occurs simultaneously with a sweeping of the microsonic frequency within the transducer's (122) harmonic bandwidth to reduce or eliminate (a) standing waves within the liquid, (b) other resonances, (c) high energy cavitation implosion, and (d) non-uniform sound fields, each of which is undesirable for cleaning and/or processing of semiconductor wafers and other delicate parts. The invention can also drive ultrasonic transducers (122) such that the frequency of applied energy has a sweep rate within the ultrasonic bandwidth of the transducers; and that sweep rate is also varied so that the sweep rate is substantially non-constant during operation. An ultrasound generator of the invention sometimes utilizes amplitude modulation (AM), and the AM frequency is swept over time so as to reduce resonances. Two or more transducers are sometimes used by the invention, in combination, to broaden the overall bandwidth of acoustical energy applied to the liquid around the primary frequency or one of the harmonics. The bandwidths of the transducers are made to overlap such that an attached generator can drive the transducers, in combination, to deliver ultrasound to the liquid in a broader bandwidth.

Description

APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR CLEANING DELICATE PARTS
Field of the Invention
The invention relates to systems and methods for cleaning and /or processing delicate parts, e.g., semiconductor wafers. In particular, the invention relates to ultrasonic systems, ultrasonic generators, ultrasonic transducers, and methods which support or enhance the application of ultrasonic energy within liquid.
Background of the Invention Ultrasonic energy has many uses; and applications of ultrasound are widespread in medicine, in the military industrial complex, and in engineering. One use of ultrasound in modern manufacturing and processing is to process and /or clean objects within liquids. For example, it is well-known that objects within an aqueous solution such as water can be cleaned by applying ultrasonic energy to the water. Typical ultrasound transducers are, for example, made from materials such as piezoelectrics, ceramics, or magnetostrictives (aluminum and iron alloys or nickel and iron alloys) which oscillate with the frequency of the applied voltage or current. These transducers transmit ultrasound into a tank filled with liquid that also covers some or all of the object to be cleaned or processed. By driving the transducer at its operational resonant frequency, e.g., 18khz, 25khz, 40khz, 670khz or IMhz, the transducer imparts ultrasonic energy to the liquid and, hence, to the object. The interaction between the energized liquid and the object create the desired cleaning or processing action.
By way of example, in the 1970s ultrasonic energy was used in liquid processing tanks and liquid cleaning tanks to enhance the manufacture of semiconductor devices and other delicate items. The typical ultrasonic frequency of such processes was a single frequency between 25khz to 50khz. Many prior art generators exist which produce single frequency ultrasonics, including those described in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,152,295; 3,293,456; 3,629,726; 3,638,087; 3,648,188; 3,651,352; 3,727,112; 3,842,340; 4,044,297; 4,054,848; 4,069,444; 4,081,706; 4,109,174; 4,141,608; 4,156,157; 4,175,242; 4,275,363; and 4,418,297. The early ultrasonic transducers were typically piezoelectric ceramics that were "clamped," i.e., compressed, so as to operate at their fundamental resonant or anti-resonant frequency. Many prior art clamped transducers exist, including those found in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,066,232; 3,094,314; 3,113,761; 3,187,207; 3,230,403; 3,778,758; 3,804,329 and RE 25,433. Other ultrasound transducers are made of alloys that possess magnetostriction properties which cause them to expand or -contract under the influence of a magnetic field.
As mentioned above, these transducers were bonded to or placed in tanks which housed the cleaning or processing liquid. Typically, such tanks were constructed of a material compatible with the processing liquid, such as: 316L stainless steel for most aqueous chemistries; 304 stainless steel for many solvents; plastics such as Teflon, polypropylene, and metals such as tantalum for strong acids; and coated metals such as Teflon-coated stainless steel for corrosive liquids.
In order to deliver ultrasound to the solution within the tank, the transducers were attached to, or made integral with, the tank. In one method, for example, epoxy bonds or brazing were used to attach the transducers to tanks made of metallic stainless steel, tantalum, titanium, or Hastalloy. In another prior art method, the drive elements of the transducers were machined or cast into the tank material, and the piezoelectric ceramic and backplates were assembled to the drive elements. The prior art also provides systems which utilize ultrasonic transducers in conjunction with plastic tanks. Typically, the tank's plastic surface was etched to create a surface that facilitated an epoxy bond thereon. The transducers were bonded with epoxy to the etched surface, and various techniques were used to keep the system cool to protect the plastic from deterioration. One such technique was to bond the transducers to an aluminum plate that would act as a heat-sink, and then to bond the aluminum plate to the plastic surface. Often, fans would be directed toward the aluminum plate and the transducers so as to enhance cooling. Another cooling technique utilized a thin plastic, or a process of machining the plastic at the trasnducer bonding position, to provide a thin wall at the transducer mounting position. This technique enhanced the cooling of the plastic and transducer by improved heat conduction into the liquid, and further improved the coupling of sound into the processing liquid because of less sound absorption. With advances in plastic formulations such as PEEK (polyetheretherketone), the prior art made improvements to the plastic ultrasonic tank by further reducing the sound absorption within the plastic material . The prior art further developed techniques for molding the transducers into the plastic material, such as through injection and rotational molding, which further improved the manufacturing of the tank as well as the processing characteristics within the tank.
For other materials such as ceramics, glass, Pyrex and quartz, the prior art used epoxy to bond the transducer to the tank surface. Casting the transducer into the material was also possible, but was not commercially used. Often, the radiating surface (i.e., the surface(s) with the ultrasonic transducers mounted thereon or therein), usually the tank bottom, would be pitched by at lease one-quarter wavelength to upset standing λvave patterns within the tank. Other tank configurations which provided similar advantages are reported in the prior art, such as disclosed by Javorik in U.S. Patent No. 4,836,684. An alternative to bonding the transducer directly to the bottom or sides of the tank was developed in the prior art by bonding the transducer to a window or plate that was sealed within a tank opening via a gasket. This had several advantages. If the transducer failed, or if cavitation erosion occurred within the radiating surface, the window or plate could be replaced without the expense of replacing the whole tank. Another advantage was the ability to use dissimilar materials. For example, a quartz tank with a tantalum window offered the advantage of an acid resistant material for the tank, and a metallic bonding and radiating surface for the transducer. In U.S. Patent No. 4,118,649, Schwartzman described the use of a tantalum window with bonded transducers which coupled ultrasonic energy into a semiconductor wafer process tank.
A second alternative to direct bonding between the transducers and the tank was developed, in the prior art, by bonding the transducers inside a sealed container, called an "immersible" or "submersible," which was placed under the liquid in the process or cleaning tank. Certain advantages were also presented in this method, including (a) the relatively inexpensive replacement of the container, and (b) the use of dissimilar materials, described above. In U.S. Patent No. 3,318,578, Branson discloses one such immersible where both the transducers and the generator are sealed in the container.
There are, however, certain disadvantages associated with above-described alternatives to direct bonding between the transducers and the tank. One such disadvantage is the occasional entrapment of contamination within the area of the window, or the window gasket, or under the immersible. When contamination-free processing is required, a direct bonded coved corner tank provides a better solution. Although tanks, plates, windows and immersibles usually had clamped transducers bonded thereon, the prior art sometimes utilized an undamped piezoelectric shape or an array of undamped piezoelectric shapes, such as PZT-4 or PZT-8, which were bonded directly to the tank, plate, window or immersible. By way of example, U.S. Patent No. 4,118,649 describes transducers shaped into hexagons, rectangles, circles, and squares and bonded to a window. These undamped transducers had the advantage of lower cost. They further could be operated in either the radial mode, for low frequency resonance, or in the longitudinal mode for "megasonic" frequency resonance (i.e., "megasonic" frequencies generally correspond to those frequencies between about 600khz and 2Mhz).
Nevertheless, these prior art undamped transducers proved to be less reliable as compared to prior art clamped transducers. Accordingly, these shaped transducer arrays were used primarily in low-cost bench-top ultrasonic baths, or in megasonic equipment where high frequency ultrasonic resonance was utilized. Still, these transducers proved to be particularly unreliable when operating at megasonic frequencies because of the high frequency stress affecting the ceramics. One other system in the prior art used to couple acoustics into a liquid is commonly referred to as a "double boiler" system. In the double boiler system, an ultrasonic plate, tank, window or immersible transmits the ultrasonics into a coupling liquid. A processing tank, beaker or other container containing the processing or cleaning chemistry is then immersed into the coupling liquid. Accordingly, the ultrasound generated within the coupling liquid transmits into the tank containing the processing or cleaning liquid. The double boiler system has several advantages. One advantage is in material selection: the transducer support structure can be made out of an inexpensive material, such as stainless steel; the coupling liquid can be a relatively inert substance, such as Dl water; and the process tank can be a material such as quartz or plastic material, which fares well with an aggressive chemistry such as sulfuric acid. Another advantage is that one transducer driving a relatively inert coupling liquid can deliver ultrasound into several different processing tanks, each containing different chemistries. Other advantages of the double boiler system are that the coupling fluid can be chosen so that its threshold of cavitation is above the cavitation threshold of the processing chemistry; and the depth of the coupling liquid can be adjusted for maximum transmission efficiency into the process tank(s). U.S. Patent No. 4,543,130 discloses one double boiler system where sound is transmitted into an inert liquid, through a quartz window, and into the semiconductor cleaning liquid.
The prior art also recognizes multi-functional, single chamber ultrasonic process systems which deliver ultrasonic cleaning or processing to liquids. In such systems, the cleaning, rinsing, and drying are done in the same tank. Pedziwiatr discloses one such system in U.S. Patent No. 4,409,999, where a single ultrasonic cleaning tank is alternately filled and drained with cleaning solution and rinsing solution, and is thereafter supplied with drying air. Other examples of single- chamber ultrasonic process systems are disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,690,333; 5,143,103; 5,201,958, and German Patent No. 29 50 893.
In the prior art, "directed field tanks" are sometimes employed where the parts to be processed have fairly significant absorption at ultrasonic frequencies. More particularly, a directed field tank has transducers mounted on several sides of the tank, where each side is angled such that ultrasound is directed toward the center of the tank from the several sides. This technique is useful, for example, in supplying ultrasound to the center of a filled wafer boat.
In the late 1980s, as semiconductor device geometries became smaller, and as densities became higher, many shortcomings were discovered with respect to conventional low-frequency ultrasonic processing and cleaning of semiconductor wafers. The main disadvantage was that the existing ultrasound systems damaged the parts, and reduced production yields. In particular, such systems typically generated a sound wave with a single frequency, or with a very narrow band of frequencies. In many cases, the single frequency, or narrow band of frequencies, would change as a function of the temperature and age of the transducers. In any event, the prior art ultrasonic systems sometimes generated sufficient cycles of sound within a narrow bandwidth so as to excite or resonate a mode of the processed part. The relatively large displacement amplitudes that exist during such a mode resonance would often damage the delicate part.
Another disadvantage of single frequency ultrasound (or narrow band ultrasound) is the standing waves created by the resonances within the liquid. The pressure anti-nodes in this standing wave are regions of intense cavitation and the pressure nodes are regions of little activity. Therefore, undesirable and non-uniform processing occurs in a standing wave sound field.
In addition to the resonant and standing wave damages caused by single frequency ultrasound (or narrow band ultrasound), damages are also caused by (a) the energy levels of each cavitation implosion, and (b) by lower frequency resonances, each of which is discussed below.
The prior art methods for eliminating or reducing the damage caused by the energy in each cavitation implosion are well known. The energy in each cavitation implosion decreases as the temperature of the liquid is increased, as the pressure on the liquid is decreased, as the surface tension of the liquid is decreased, and as the frequency of the sound is increased. Any one or combination of these methods are used to decrease the energy in each cavitation implosion.
By way of example, one benefit in reducing the energy in each cavitation implosion is realized in the manufacture of hard disk drives for computers. The base media for a hard disk is an aluminum lapped and polished disk. These disks are subjected to 40khz ultrasonic cleaning in aqueous solutions with moderate temperature, often resulting in pitting caused by cavitation that removes the base material from the surface of the aluminum disk. As discussed above, one solution to this problem is to raise the temperature of the aqueous solution to above 90°C. This causes the energy in each cavitation implosion to be less than the energy which typically removes base material from the aluminum disk. It is important, however, to keep the temperature below a value (typically 95°C) which provides a cavitation implosion that is strong enough to remove the contamination. Another solution to the problem is to use a higher frequency ultrasound. A 72khz ultrasonic system typically has the proper energy level in each cavitation implosion, with moderate temperature aqueous solutions, to remove contamination without removing base material from the lapped and polished aluminum disk. In the prior art, wet bench systems often consist of several low frequency ultrasonic and /or megasonic tanks with different chemistries disposed therein. For example, a cleaning tank followed by two rinsing tanks, usually in a reverse cascading configuration, is a common wet bench configuration. In wet bench systems, there is an optimum value for the energy in each cavitation implosion: the highest energy cavitation implosion that does not cause cavitation damage to the part being processed or cleaned. However, because different chemistries are used in different tanks in the wet bench system, the energy in each cavitation implosion, for a given frequency, will be different in each tank. Therefore, not all tanks will have the optimum value of energy in each cavitation implosion. This problem has been addressed in the prior art by using different frequency ultrasonics in the different tanks. For example, the cleaning tank can have a chemistry with low surface tension, where a low frequency such as 40khz gives the optimum energy in each cavitation implosion. The rinsing tanks, on the other hand, might use Dl water, which has a high surface tension; and thus 72khz ultrasonics may be needed to match the energy of the 40khz tank for each cavitation implosion .
In single chamber process systems, different chemistries are pumped in and out of one tank. Because such process systems typically generate single or narrow band frequencies, or frequendes in a finite bandwidth, the energy in each cavitation implosion is optimum for one chemistry and not generally optimum for the other chemistries. Such systems are therefore relatively inefficient for use with many different chemistries.
Certain prior art ultrasonic systems generate ultrasonic frequencies in two or more unconnected frequencies, such as 40khz and 68khz. Although these systems had great commercial appeal, experimental results have showed little or no merit to these multi-frequency systems. Such systems tend to have all of the problems listed above, whereby the cleaning and damaging aspects of ultrasound are generally dependent upon a single frequency. That is, for example, if the higher frequency provides adequate cleaning, without damage, the lower frequency may cause cavitation damage to the part. By way of a further example, if the lower frequency provides cleaning without damage, then the higher frequency has little or no practical value. Cavitation damage can also occur when the delicate parts are removed from an operating ultrasonic bath. This damage occurs when the ultrasound reflects off of the liquid-air interface at the top of the tank to create non-uniform hot spots, i.e., zones of intense cavitation. The prior art has addressed this problem by turning the ultrasonics off before passing a delicate part through the liquid-air interface. Low frequency resonant damage is a relatively new phenomenon. The prior art has focused on solving the other, more significant problems - i.e., ultrasonic frequency resonance and cavitation damage - before addressing the low frequency resonant effects of an ultrasonic system. However, the prior art solutions to low frequency ultrasonic damage are, in part, due to a reaction to the problems associated with 25khz to 50khz ultiasound, described above. Specifically, the prior art has primarily focused on utilizing high frequency ultrasound in the processing and cleaning of semiconductor wafers and other delicate parts. These high frequency ultrasonic systems are single-frequency, continuous wave (CW) systems which operate from 600khz to about 2Mhz, a frequency range which is referred to as "megasonics" in the prior art.
One such megasonic system is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,893,869. The transducers of this system and other similar systems are typically 0.1 inch thick and are undamped piezoelectric ceramics driven at their resonant frequency by a single frequency continuous-wave generator. All the techniques described above, e.g., material selections, tank configurations, and bonding techniques, and used with lower frequency ultrasonics were employed in the megasonic frequency systems of the prior art. For example, because of the aggressive chemistries used, quartz or Teflon tanks with a transducerized quartz window became a common configuration adapted from lower frequency ultrasonic systems. As described earlier and disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,118,649, the bonding of piezoelectric shapes to a tank, plate, window or immersible, by epoxy, were the common ways to integrate megasonic transducers within a treatment tank. One alternative is disclosed by Cook in U.S. Patent No. 4,527,901, where the ceramic is fired, and then polarized, as part of the tank assembly. Another prior art alternative to the bonding a piezoelectric shape by epoxy is to mold or cast the piezoelectric shape into the product. For example, one prior art system utilizes a piezoelectric circle that has been injection-molded into a tank assembly. The prior art also suggests that a piezoelectric rectangle could be cast into a quartz window; however, in this case, poling or repoling the ceramic after casting may be necessary if it exceeds its curie point.
The megasonic systems of the prior art overcame many of the disadvantages and problems associated with 25k hz to 50khz systems. First, because the energy in each cavitation implosion decreases with increasing frequency, damages due to cavitation implosion have been reduced or eliminated. Instead of cavitation implosion, megasonic systems depend on the microstreaming effect present in ultrasonic fields to give enhanced processing or cleaning. Resonant effects, although theoretically present, are minimal because the geometries of the delicate parts are typically not resonant at megasonic frequencies. As geometries become smaller, however, such as in state-of-the-art equipment, certain prior art megasonic systems have had to increase their operating frequencies to 2Mhz or greater.
An alternative to higher frequency megasonics is to optimize the ultrasonic * energies with amplitude modulation (AM) of a frequency modulated (FM) wave. Such systems operate by adjusting one of seven ultrasonic generator parameters - center frequency, bandwidth, sweep time, train time, degas time, burst time, and quiet time - to adjust one or more of the following characteristics within the liquid : energy in each cavitation implosion, average cavitation density, cavitation density as a function of time, cavitation density as a function of position in the tank and average gaseous concentration .
When megasonic systems became popular as a solution to cavitation and resonant damages caused by lower frequency ultrasonic systems, the prior art suggests that even higher frequencies be utilized in the removal of smaller, sub- micron particulate contamination. Recent data and physical understanding of the megasonic process, however, suggest that this is not the case. The microstreaming mechanism upon which megasonics depends penetrates the boundary layer next to a semiconductor wafer and relies on a pumping action to continuously deliver fresh solution to the wafer surface while simultaneously removing contamination and spent chemistry Cleaning or processing with megasonics therefore depends upon (a) the chemical action of the particular cleamng, rinsing, or processing chemistry m the megasonics tank, and (b) the microstreaming which delivers the chemistry to the surface of the part being processed, πnsed, or cleaned
However, because microstreaming is produced in all high intensity ultrasonic fields in liquids, it can be expected that submicron size particle removal will occur in any high intensity ultrasonic field When experiments were done where the problems of non-umformity, high cavitation energy, and resonance were overcome by ultrasonic techniques such as those taught by U.S. Patent No. 4,736,130, the data showed effective submicron particle removal at all ultrasonic frequencies used for semiconductor wafer cleaning and processing
One problem with prior art megasonic systems relates to the transducer design and operation frequency. In prior art megasonic systems, the commonly available 0 1 inch thick piezoelectric ceramic shapes are bonded to a typical tank or gasketed plate and have a fundamental resonant frequency in the 600khz to 900khz frequency range The mam difference between these megasonic transducers and the 25khz or 40khz transducers is that the lower frequency transducers are clamped systems, i.e., where the piezoelectric ceramic is always under compression, whereas the megasonic transducers are undamped. Because the megasonic transducers are undamped, the piezoelectric ceramics go into tension during its normal operation, reducing the transducer's reliability . This remains a significant problem with pnor art megasonic systems. More particularly, ceramic is very strong under compression, but weak and prone to fracture when put into tension. When a clamped transducer is made, the front driver and the backplate compress the piezoelectric ceramic by means of a bolt or a number of bolts However, the front driver and the backplate become part of the piezoelectric resonant structure, and operate to lower the resonant frequency of the combined part The prior art clamped ultrasonic transducer structures resonate at fundamental frequencies well below the megasonic frequencies, and generally at 90khz and below Therefore, one significant problem with megasonic systems and equipment is overall reliability. The megasonic piezoelectric ceramic is put into tension at 600,000 times per second (i.e., 600khz), at least, during operation. This tension causes the ceramics to crack because it weakens and fatigues the material with repeated cycles. Two other problems of prior art megasonic systems relate to the nature of high frequency sound waves in a liquid. Sound waves with frequencies above 500khz travel like a beam within liquid, and further exhibit high attenuation. This beam effect is a problem because it is very difficult to uniformly fill the process or cleaning tank with the acoustic field. Therefore, the prior art has devised techniques to compensate for the beam effect, such as by (a) spreading the sound around the tank through use of acoustic lenses, or by (b) physically moving the parts through the acoustic beam. The beam and attenuation effects of megasonic systems result in non-uniform processing, and other undesirable artifacts.
In the last ten years, several manufacturers of prior art ultrasonic systems have introduced frequency-sweeping ultrasonic generators with certain frequencies in the 25khz to 72khz frequency range. Such systems overcome many of the problems associated in the prior art. By way of example, many or all of the damaging standing waves and resonances are eliminated by these frequency- sweeping ultrasonic systems. These systems reduce resonant damages by sweeping the frequencies fast enough, and over a large enough bandwidth, so that it greatly reduces the likelihood of having resonances within the tank. A rapid frequency sweeping system generates each cycle of sound (or in some cases, each half cycle of sound) at a significantly different frequency from the preceding cycle of sound (or half cycle of sound). Therefore, the build up of resonant energy required to impart a resonance amplitude within the part rarely or never occurs.
Another advantage of frequency sweeping ultrasonic systems is that they increase the ultrasonic activity in the tank because there is less loss due to wave cancellation. One of the first frequency sweeping ultrasonic generators had a bandwidth of 2khz, a sweep rate of lOOhz, and a center frequency of 40khz. Accordingly, at a frequency change 400khz per second - i.e., two kilohertz sweeping up from 39khz to 41khz, plus two kilohertz sweeping down from 41khz to 39khz, times 100 times per second equals 400khz per second - the increased ultrasonic activity was able to cavitate semi-aqueous solvents which were previously impossible to continuously cavitate with commercially available conventional ultrasonic generators.
The frequency-sweeping activity in the prior art was so significant that by 1991 every major ultrasonic manufacture was shipping 40khz generators that changed frequency at frequency sweep rates of up to 4.8Mhz per second. This rapid sweeping of frequency provided good ultrasonic activity even at continuous wave (CW) operation. By way of example, one lOkilowatt, 40khz generator in the prior art operated directly from a rectified three-phase power signal which provided a 800khz per second CW frequency-sweeping system that had superior performance as compared to AM single frequency ultrasonic systems.
Although the main problems with lower frequency ultrasonics were solved by frequency sweeping, cavitation damage could occur in any process where the energy in each cavitation implosion was strong enough to remove an atom or a molecule from the surface of the semiconductor wafer or the delicate part. As disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,736,130, system optimization at lower frequency ultrasonics permitted successful processing of many delicate parts because it was possible to maximize the microstreaming effects while minimizing adverse cavitation effects. However, the potential for cavitation damage remains a concern - of the industry.
One important limitation to further improvement of ultrasonic processes is the low frequency and the narrow bandwidth of clamped piezoelectric transducers. For example, typical clamped or undamped prior art transducers provide about 4khz in overall bandwidth. One other important limitation of ultrasonic processes is that although amplitude control is known to be beneficial, inexpensive and uncomplicated ways of providing AM are generally not available.
Other problems exist in the prior art in that certain systems are driven by more than one ultrasonic generator. Such generators typically operate to either (a) drive the same tank, or (b) drive multiple tanks in the same system. Although the generators are typically set to the same sweep rate, the independent generators will never have exactly the same sweep rate. This causes another low frequency resonance problem within an ultrasonic tank or system. In addition, one problem with multiple tanks and multiple generators is that some of the ultrasound from one tank is coupled through connecting structure to the other tank(s). This creates unwanted cross-talk and negatively affects the desired cleaning or processing within the tank. In particular, prior art multi-generator systems sometimes create an undesirable beat frequency which causes low frequency resonance in susceptible parts. For example, consider two sweeping frequency generators, each with sweep rates of approximately lOhz sweeping over a bandwidth of 4khz with a center frequency of 40khz. Now consider a delicate part to be cleaned that has a low frequency resonance at one kilohertz. The following condition will occur periodically: one generator will be changing frequency from 38k hz to 41 khz, while the other generator is changing frequency from 39khz to 42khz. In this example, this will occur for about 37.5 milliseconds. Since the two frequencies in the tank or system are about one kilohertz apart, a beat frequency of about one kilohertz is produced. The period of one kilohertz is one millisecond, therefore a string of thirty- seven beats at about one kilohertz are produced. This is sufficient to setup a destructive resonance in a delicate part with a one kilohertz resonance
It is, therefore, an object of the invention to provide ultrasonic systems which reduce or eliminate the problems in the prior art. Another object of the invention is to provide improvements to ultrasonic generators, to transducers applying ultrasound energy to liquids, and to methods for reducing the damage to delicate parts.
It is still another object of the invention to provide methodology for applying ultrasound to liquid in a manner which is compatible with both the tank chemistry and the part under process.
Still another object of the invention to provide a method of supplying suitable energies in each cavitation implosion, in a single chamber process system, where different chemistries are used in different parts of the process.
Another object of the invention is to provide an ultrasonic generator that reduces the repetition of low frequency components from an ultrasonic bath to reduce or eliminate low frequency resonances within the bath. One objective of this invention is to overcome certain disadvantages of prior art megasonic systems while retaining certain advantages of megasonic cleaning and /or processing.
It is a further objective of this invention to provide ultrasonic transducer arrays which supply ultrasonic energy with microstreaming and without significant cavitation implosion.
Still another object of this invention is to provide methodology of improved amplitude control in ultrasonic systems.
Another object of the invention is to provide systems which reduce or eliminate beating and/ or cross-talk within a liquid caused by simultaneous operation of a plurality of generators.
These and other objects of the invention will be apparent from the description which follows.
Summary of the Invention
As used herein, "ultrasound" and "ultrasonic" generally refer to acoustic disturbances in a frequency range above about eighteen kilohertz and which extend upwards to over two megahertz. "Lower frequency" ultrasound, or "low frequency" ultrasound mean ultrasoLind between about 18khz and 90khz. "Megasonics" or "megasonic" refer to acoustic disturbances between 600khz and 2Mhz. As discussed above, the prior art has manufactured "low frequency" and "megasonic" ultrasound systems. Typical prior art low frequency systems, for example, operate at 25khz, 40khz, and as high as 90khz. Typical prior art megasonic systems operate between 600khz and IMhz. Certain aspects of the invention apply to low frequency ultrasound and to megasonics. However, certain aspects of the invention apply to ultrasound in the lOOkhz to 350khz region, a frequency range which is sometimes denoted herein as "microsonics."
As used herein, "resonant transducer" means a transducer operated at a frequency or in a range of frequencies that correspond to a one-half wavelength (λ) of sound in the transducer stack. "Harmonic transducer" means a transducer operated at a frequency or in a range of frequencies that correspond to lλ, 1.5λ, 2λ or 2.5λ of sound, and so on, in the transducer stack. "Bandwidth" means the range of frequencies in a resonant or harmonic region of a transducer over which the acoustic power output of a transducer remains between 50% and 100% of the maximum value. As used herein, a "delicate part" refers to those parts which are undergoing a manufacture, process, or cleaning operation within liquid subjected to ultrasonic energy. By way of example, one delicate part is a semiconductor wafer which has extremely small features and which is easily damaged by cavitation implosion. A delicate part often defines components in the computer industry, including disk drives, semiconductor components, and the like.
As used herein, "khz" refers to kilohertz and a frequency magnitude of one thousand hertz. "Mhz" refers to megahertz and a frequency magnitude of one million hertz.
As used herein, "sweep rate" or "sweep frequency" refer to the rate or frequency at which a generator and transducer's frequency is varied. That is, it is generally undesirable to operate an ultrasonic transducer at a fixed, single frequency because of the resonances created at that frequency. Therefore, an ultrasonic generator can sweep (i.e., linearly change) the operational frequency through some or all of the available frequencies within the transducer's bandwidth at a "sweep rate." Accordingly, particular frequencies have only short duration during the sweep cycle (i.e., the time period for sweeping the ultrasound frequency through a range of frequencies within the bandwidth). "Sweep the sweep rate" or "double sweeping" or "dual sweep" refer to an operation of changing the sweep rate as a function of time. In accord with the invention, "sweeping the sweep rate" generally refers to the operation of sweeping (i.e., linearly changing) the sweep rate so as to reduce or eliminate resonances generated at the sweep frequency.
The present invention concerns the applied uses of ultrasound energy, and in particular the application and control of ultrasonics to clean and process delicate parts, e.g., semiconductor wafers, within a liquid. Generally, in accord with the invention, one or more ultrasonic generators drive one or more ultrasonic transducers, or arrays of transducers, coupled to a liquid to clean and /or process the delicate part. The liquid is preferably held within a tank; and the transducers mount on or within the tank to impart ultrasound into the liquid. In this context, the invention is particularly directed to one or more of the following aspects and advantages:
(1) By utilizing harmonics of certain clamped ultrasound transducers, the invention generates, in one aspect, ultrasound within the liquid in a frequency range of between about lOOkhz to 350khz (i.e., "microsonic" frequencies). This has certain advantages over the prior art. In particular, unlike prior art low frequency ultrasound systems which operate at less than lOOkhz, the invention eliminates or greatly reduces damaging cavitation implosions within the liquid. Further, the transducers operating in this frequency range provide relatively uniform microstreaming, such as provided by megasonics; but they are also relatively rugged and reliable, unlike megasonic transducer elements. In addition, and unlike megasonics, microsonic waves are not highly collimated, or "beam-like," within liquid; and therefore efficiently couple into the geometry of the ultrasonic tank.
Preferably, the application of microsonic frequencies to liquid occurs simultaneously with a sweeping of the microsonic frequency within the transducer's harmonic bandwidth. That is, microsonic transducers (clamped harmonic transducers) are most practical when there is a sweep rate of the applied microsonic frequency. This combination reduces or eliminates (a) standing waves within the liquid, (b) other resonances, (c) high energy cavitation implosions, and (d) non-uniform sound fields, each of which is undesirable for cleaning or processing semiconductor wafers and delicate parts. (2) The ultrasound transducers or arrays of the invention typically have a finite bandwidth associated with the range of frequencies about a resonant or harmonic frequency. When driven at frequencies within the bandwidth, the transducers generate acoustic energy that is coupled into the liquid. In one aspect, the invention drives the transducers such that the frequency of applied energy has a sweep rate within the bandwidth; and that sweep rate is also varied so that the sweep rate is substantially non-constant during operation. For example, the sweep rate can change linearly, randomly, or as some other function of time. In this manner, the invention reduces or eliminates resonances which are created by transducers operating with a single sweep rate, such as provided in the prior art.
(3) At least one ultrasound generator of the invention utilizes amplitude modulation (AM). However, unlike the prior art, this AM generator operates by selectively changing the AM frequency over time. In a preferred aspect of the invention, the AM frequency is swept through a range of frequencies which reduce or eliminate low frequency resonances within the liquid and the part being processed. Accordingly, the AM frequency is swept through a range of frequencies; and this range is typically defined as about 10-40% of the optimum AM frequency. The optimum AM frequency is usually between about lhz and lOkhz. Therefore, for example, if the optimum AM frequency is lkhz, then the AM frequency is swept through a frequency range of between about 850hz and 1150hz. In addition, the rate at which these frequencies are varied is usually less than about 1 / lOth of the optimum AM frequency. In this example, therefore, the AM sweep rate is about lOOhz. These operations of sweeping the AM frequency through a range of frequencies and at a defined AM sweep rate reduce or eliminate unwanted resonances which might otherwise occur at the optimum AM frequency. In another aspect of the invention, for delicate parts with very low frequency resonances, the AM frequency is changed randomly or the AM sweep rate is swept at a function of time with a frequency about 1/lOth of the AM sweep rate.
(4) The invention provides AM control by selecting a portion of the rectified power line frequency (e.g., 60hz in the United States and 50hz in
Europe). In one aspect, this AM control is implemented by selecting a portion of the leading quarter sinusoid in a full wave amplitude modulation pattern that ends at the required amplitude in the zero to 90° and the 180° to 270° regions. Another AM control is implemented by selecting a portion of the leading quarter sinusoid in a half wave amplitude modulation pattern that ends at the required amplitude in the zero to 90° region. (5) The invention can utilize several tanks, transducers and generators simultaneously to provide a wet bath of different chemistries for the delicate part. In one aspect, when two or more generators are operating at the same time, the invention synchronizes their operation to a common FM signal so that each generator can be adjusted, through AM, to control the process characteristics within the associated tank. In this manner, undesirable beating effects or cross-coupling between multiple tanks are reduced or eliminated. In a preferred aspect, a master generator provides a common FM signal to the other generators, each operating as a slave generator coupled to the master generator, and each slave generator provides AM selectively. In addition, because the transducers in the several tanks are sometimes swept through the frequencies of the transducer's bandwidth, the FM control maintains overall synchronization even though varying AM is applied to the several transducers. The multi-generator FM synchronization also applies to single tank ultrasonic systems. That is, the invention supports the synchronized operation of a plurality of generators that are connected to a single tank. In this case, each generator has an associated harmonic transducer array and is driven with a common FM signal and AM signal so that the frequencies within the tank are synchronized, in amplitude and phase, to reduce or eliminate unwanted resonances which might otherwise occur through beating effects between the multiple generators and transducers.
(6) In another aspect, the invention utilizes two or more transducers, in combination, to broaden the overall bandwidth of acoustical energy applied to the liquid around the primary frequency or one of the harmonics. For example, the invention of one aspect has two clamped transducers operating at their first, second third, or fourth harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz. The center harmonic frequency of each is adjusted so as to be different from each other. However, their bandwidths are made to overlap such that an attached generator can drive the transducers, in combination, to deliver ultrasound to the liquid in a broader bandwidth. In a preferred aspect, two or more transducers, or transducer arrays, operate at unique harmonic frequencies and have finite bandwidths that overlap with each of the other transducers. If, for example, each transducer has a bandwidth of 4khz, then two such transducers can approximately provide a 8khz bandwidth, and three such transducers can approximately provide a 12khz bandwidth, and so on. (7) In one aspect, the invention provides a single tank system which selects a desired frequency, or range of frequencies, from a plurality of connected ultrasonic generators. Specifically, two or more generators, each operating or optimized to generate a range of frequencies, are connected to a mux; and the system selects the desired frequency range, and hence the right generator, according to the cavitation implosion energy that is desired within the tank chemistry.
(8) The invention has additional and sometimes greater advantages in systems and methods which combine one or more of the features in the above paragraphs (1) through (7). By way of example, one particularly useful system combines two or more microsonic transducers (i.e., paragraph 1) to create broadband microsonics (i.e., paragraph 6) within liquid. Such a system can further be controlled to provide a specific amplitude modulation (i.e., paragraph 4). Other particularly advantageous systems and methods of the invention are realized with the following combinations: (2) and (4); (1), (2) and (4); and (1) and (2) with frequency sweeping of the microsonic frequency.
The following patents, each incorporated herein by reference, provide useful background to the invention in the area of ultrasonic generators: 3,152,295; 3,293,456; 3,629,726; 3,638,087; 3, 648,188; 3,651,352; 3,727,112; 3,842,340; 4,044,297; 4,054,848; 4,069,444; 4,081,706; 4,109,174; 4,141,608; 4,156,157; 4,175,242; 4,275,363; and 4,418,297. Further, U.S. Patent Nos. 4,743,789 and 4,736,130 provide particularly useful background in connection with ultrasonic generators that are suitable for use with certain aspects of the invention, and are, accordingly incorporated herein by reference. Clamped ultrasonic transducers suitable for use with the invention are known in the art. For example, the following patents, each incorporated herein by reference, provide useful background to the invention: 3,066,232; 3,094,314; 3,113,761; 3,187,207; 3,230,403; 3,778,758; 3,804,329 and RE 25,433.
Techniques for mounting or affixing transducers within the tank, and of arranging the transducer and /or tank geometry are, for example, described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,118,649; 4,527,901; 4,543,130 and 4,836,684. Each of these patents is also incorporated by reference.
Single chamber ultrasonic processing systems are described, for example, in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,690,333; 4,409,999; 5,143,103; and 5,201,958. Such systems provide additional background to the invention and are, accordingly, incorporated herein by reference.
In one aspect, the invention provides a system for delivering broadband ultrasound to liquid. The system includes first and second ultrasonic transducers. The first transducer has a first frequency and a first ultrasound bandwidth, and the second transducer has a second frequency and a second ultrasound bandwidth. The first and second bandwidths are overlapping with each other and the first frequency is different from the second frequency. An ultrasound generator drives the transducers at frequencies within the bandwidths. Together, the first and second transducers and the generator produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than either of the first and second bandwidths. In another aspect, the system of the invention includes a third ultrasonic transducer that has a third frequency and a third ultrasound bandwidth. The third bandwidth is overlapping with at least one of the other bandwidths, and the third frequency is different from the first and second frequencies. The generator in this aspect drives the third transducer within the third bandwidth so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than any of the first, second and third bandwidths.
Preferably, each of the transducers are clamped so as to resist material strain and fatigue. In another aspect, each of the first and second frequencies are harmonic frequencies of the transducer's base resonant frequency. In one aspect, these harmonic frequencies are between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
In another aspect, the system includes at least one other synergistic ultrasonic transducer that has a synergistic frequency and a synergistic ultrasound bandwidth. As above, the synergistic bandwidth is overlapping with at least one of the other bandwidths, and the synergistic frequency is different from the first and second frequencies. The generator drives the synergistic transducer within the synergistic bandwidth so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined 5 bandwidth that is greater than any of the other bandwidths. In one aspect, this synergistic frequency is a harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
In other aspects, the bandwidths of combined transducers overlap so that, in combination, the transducers produce ultrasonic energy at substantially all frequencies within the combined bandwidth. Preferably, the combined operation i o provides ultrasound with relatively equal power for any frequency in the combined bandwidth. Using the full width half maximum (FWHM) to define each bandwidth, the bandwidths preferably overlap such that the power at each frequency within the combined bandwidth is within a factor of two of ultrasonic energy produced at any other frequency within the combined bandwidth.
15 In another aspect, a system is provided for delivering ttltrasound to liquid.
The system has an ultrasonic transducer with a harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz and within an ultrasound bandwidth. A clamp applies compression to the transducer. An ultrasound generator drives the transducer at a range of frequencies within the bandwidth so as to produce ultrasound within the
20 liquid.
In still another aspect, the system can include at least one other ultrasonic transducer that has a second harmonic frequency within a second bandwidth. As above, the second frequency is between about lOOkhz and 350khz, and the second bandwidth is overlapping, in frequency, with the ultrasound bandwidth. The
25 generator drives the transducers at frequencies within the bandwidths so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than the bandwidth of a single transducer.
Another aspect of the invention provides a system for delivering ultrasound to liquid. In such a system, one or more ultrasonic transducers have an operating
30 frequency within an ultrasound bandwidth. An ultrasound generator drives the transducers at frequencies within the bandwidth, and also changes the sweep rate of the frequency continuously so as to produce non-resonating ultrasound within the liquid.
Preferably, the generator of the invention changes the sweep rate frequency in one of several ways. In one aspect, for example, the sweep rate is varied as a function of time. In another aspect, the sweep rate is changed randomly. Typically, the sweep rate frequency is changed through a range of frequencies that are between about 10-50% of the optimum sweep rate frequency. The optimum sweep rate frequency is usually between about lhz and 1.2khz; and, therefore, the range of frequencies through winch the sweep rate is vaned can change dramatically By way of example, if the optimum sweep rate is 500hz, then the range of sweep rate frequencies is between about 400hz and 600hz; and the invention operates by varying the sweep rate within this range linearly, randomly, or as a function of time, so as to optimize processing characteπstics within the liquid
The invention further provides a system for delivering ultrasound to liquid. This system includes one or more ultrasonic transducers, each having an operating frequency within an ultrasound bandwidth. An amplitude modulated ultrasound generator drives the transducers at frequencies within the bandwidth. A generator subsystem also changes the modulation frequency of the AM, continually, so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid to prevent low frequency resonances at the AM frequency
Preferably, the subsystem sweeps the AM frequency at a sweep rate between about lhz and lOOhz. For extremely sensitive parts and /or tank chemistries, the invention can further sweep the AM sλveep rate as a function of time so as to eliminate possible resonances which might be generated by the AM sweep rate frequency. This sweeping of the AM sweep rate occurs for a range of AM sweep frequencies generally defined by 10-40% of the optimum AM sweep rate. For example, if the optimum AM sweep rate is 150hz, then one aspect of the invention changes the AM sweep rate through a range of about 130hz to 170hz
In one aspect, the invention also provides amplitude control through the power lines Specifically, amplitude modulation is achieved by selecting a portion of a leading quarter sinusoid, in a fall wave amplitude modulation pattern, that ends at a selected amplitude in a region between zero and 90° and between 180° and 270° of the sinusoid. Alternatively, amplitude control is achieved by selecting a portion of a leading quarter sinusoid, in a half wave amplitude modulation pattern, that ends at a selected amplitude between zero and 90° of the sinusoid.
In still another aspect, a system of the invention can include two or more ultrasound generators that are synchronized in magnitude and phase so that there is substantially zero frequency difference between signals generated by the generators. Preferably, a timing signal is generated between the generators to synchronize the signals. In one aspect, a FM generator provides a master frequency modulated signal to each generator to synchronize the signals from the generators. A generator of the invention can also be frequency modulated over a range of frequencies within the bandwidth of each transducer. In another aspect, the frequency modulation occurs over a range of frequencies within the bandwidth of each transducer, and the generator is amplitude modulated over a range of frequencies within the bandwidth of each transducer. The systems of the invention generally include a chamber for holding the solution or liquid which is used to clean or process objects therein. The chamber can include, for example, material such as 316L stainless steel, 304 stainless steel, polytetrafluoroethylene, fluorinated ethylene propylene, polyvinylidine fluoride, perfluoroalkoxy, polypropylene, polyetheretherketone, tantalum, teflon coated stainless steel, titanium, hastalloy, and mixtures thereof.
It is preferable that the transducers of the system include an array of ultrasound transducer elements.
The invention also provides a method of delivering broadband ultrasound to liquid, including the steps of: driving a first ultiasound transducer with a generator at a first frequency and within a first ultrasound bandwidth, and driving a second ultrasound transducer with the generator at a second frequency within a second ultrasound bandwidth that overlaps at least part of the first bandwidth, such that the first and second transducers, in combination with the generator, produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than either of the first and second bandwidths. In other aspects, the method includes the step of compressing at least one of the transducers, and/ or the step of driving the first and second transducers at harmonic frequencies between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
Preferably, the method includes the step of arranging the bandwidths to overlap so that the transducers and generator produce ultrasonic energy, at each frequency, that is within a factor of two of ultrasonic energy produced by the transducers and generator at any other frequency within the combined bandwidth.
The application of broadband ultrasound has certain advantages. First, it increases the useful bandwidth of multiple transducer assemblies so that the advantages to sweeping ultrasound are enhanced. The broadband ultrasound also gives more ultrasonic intensity for a given power level because there are additional and different frequencies spaced further apart in the ultrasomc bath at any one time. Therefore, there is less sound energy cancellation because only frequencies of the same wavelength, the same amplitude and opposite phase cancel effectively In one aspect, the method of the invention includes the step of driving an ultrasonic transducer in a first bandwidth of harmonic frequencies centered about a microsonic frequency in the range of lOOkhz and 350khz For protection, the transducer is preferably compressed to protect its integrity.
Another method of the invention provides the following steps: coupling one or more ultrasonic transducers to the liquid, driving, with a generator, the transducers to an operating frequency within an ultrasound bandwidth, the transducers and generator generating ultrasound within the liquid, changing the frequency within the bandwidth at a sweep rate, and continuously varying the sweep rate as a function of time so as to reduce low frequency resonances. In other aspects, the sweep rate is varied according to one of the following steps: sweeping the sweep rate as a function of time; linearly sweeping the sweep rate as a function of time, and randomly sweeping the sweep rate. Usually, the optimum sweep frequency is between about lhz and 1.2khz, and therefore, in other aspects, the methods of the invention change the sweep rate within a range of sweep frequencies centered about an optimum sweep frequency. Typically, this range is defined by about 10-50% of the optimum sweep frequency. For example, if the optimum sweep frequency is 800hz, then the range of sweep frequencies is between about 720hz and 880hz. Further, and in another aspect, the rate at which the invention sweeps the sweep rate within this range is varied at less than about 1 / 10th of the optimum frequency. Therefore, in this example, the invention changes the sweep rate at a rate that is less than about 80hz. Another method of the invention provides for the steps of (a) generating a drive signal for one or more ultrasonic transducers, each having an operating frequency within an ultrasound bandwidth, (b) amplitude modulating the drive signal at a modulation frequency, and (c) sweeping the modulation frequency, selectively, as to produce ultrasound within the liquid. The invention is particularly useful as an ultrasonic system which couples acoustic energy into a liquid for purposes of cleaning parts, developing photosensitive polymers, and stripping material from surfaces. The invention can provide many sound frequencies to the liquid by sweeping the sound through the bandwidth of the transducers. This provides at least three advantages: the standing waves causing cavitation hot spots in the liquid are reduced or eliminated; part resonances within the liquid at ultrasonic frequencies are reduced or eliminated; and the ultrasonic activity in the liquid builds up to a higher intensity because there is less cancellation of sound waves.
In one aspect, the invention provides an ultrasonic bath with transducers having at least two different resonant frequencies. In one configuration, the resonant frequencies are made so that the bandwidths of the transducers overlap and so that the impedance versus frequency curve for the paralleled transducers exhibit maximum flatness in the resonant region. For example, when a 40khz transducer with a 4.1khz bandwidth is put in parallel - i.e., with overlapping bandwidths - with a 44khz transducer with a 4.2khz bandwidth, the resultant bandwidth of the multiple transducer assembly is about 8 khz. If transducers with three different frequencies are used, the bandwidth is approximately three times the bandwidth of a single transducer.
In another aspect, a clamped transducer array is provided with a resonant frequency of 40khz and a bandwidth of 4 khz. The array has a second harmonic resonant frequency at 104khz with a 4khz harmonic bandwidth. Preferably, the bandwidth of this second harmonic frequency resonance is increased by the methods described above for the fundamental frequency of a clamped transducer array.
In one aspect, the invention provides a method and associated circuitry which constantly changes the sweep rate of an ultrasonic transducer within a range of values that is in an optimum process range. For example, one exemplary process can have an optimum sweep rate in the range 380hz to 530hz. In accord with one aspect of the invention, this sweep rate constantly changes within the 380hz to 530hz range so that the sweep rate does not set up resonances within the tank and set up a resonance at that rate. The invention provides for several methods to change the sweep rate. One of the most effective methods is to generate a random change in sweep rate within the specified range. A simpler method is to sweep the sweep rate at some given function of time, e.g., linearly. One problem with sweeping the sweep rate is that the sweeping function of time has a specific frequency which may itself cause a resonance. Accordingly, one aspect of the invention is to sweep this time function; however, in practice, the time function has a specific frequency lower than the lowest resonant frequency of the semiconductor wafer or delicate part, so there is little need to eliminate that specific frequency.
Most prior art ultrasonic systems are amplitude modulated at a low frequency, typically 50 hz, 60hz, lOOhz, or 120hz. One ultrasonic generator, the proSONIK™ sold by Ney Ultrasonics Inc., and produced according to U. S. Patent No. 4,736,130, permits the generation of a specific amplitude modulation pattern that is typically between 50hz to 5khz. However, the specific amplitude modulation frequency can itself be a cause of low frequency resonance in an ultrasonic bath if the selected amplitude modulation frequency is a resonant frequency of the delicate part.
Accordingly, one aspect of the invention solves the problem of delicate part resonance at the amplitude modulation frequency by randomly changing or sweeping the frequency of the amplitude modulation within a bandwidth of amplitude modulation frequencies that satisfy the process specifications. For cases where substantially all of the low frequencies must be eliminated, random changes of the modulation frequency are preferred. For cases where there are no resonances in a part below a specified frequency, the amplitude modulation frequency can be swept at a frequency below the specified frequency.
Random changing or sweeping of the amplitude modulation frequency inhibits low frequency resonances because there is little repetitive energy at a frequency within the resonant range of the delicate part or semiconductor wafer.
Accordingly, a resonant condition does not build up, in accord with the invention, providing obvious advantages.
The invention also provides relatively inexpensive amplitude control as compared to the prior art. One aspect of the invention provides amplitude control with a full wave or half wave amplitude modulated ultrasonic signal. For full wave, a section of the 0° to 90° and the 180° to 270° quarter sinusoid is chosen which ends at the required (desired) amplitude. For example, at the zero crossover of the half sinusoid (0° and 180°), a monostable multivibrator is triggered. It is set to time out before 90° duration, and specifically at the required amplitude value. This timed monostable multivibrator pulse is used to select that section of the quarter sinusoid that never exceeds the required amplitude.
In one aspect, the invention also provides an adjustable ultrasonic generator. One aspect of this generator is that the sweep rate frequency and the amplitude modulation pattern frequency are randomly changed or swept within the optimum range for a selected process. Another aspect is that the generator drives an expanded bandwidth clamped piezoelectric transducer array at a harmonic frequency from lOOkhz to 350khz.
Such a generator provides several improvements in the problematic areas affecting lower frequency ultrasonics and megasonics: uncontrolled cavitation implosion, unwanted resonances, unreliable transducers, and standing waves.
Instead, the system of the invention provides uniform microstreaming that is critical to semiconductor wafer and other delicate part processing and cleaning.
In another aspect of the invention, an array of transducers is used to transmit sound into a liquid at its fundamental frequency, e.g., 40khz, and at each harmonic frequency, e.g., 72khz or 104khz. The outputs of generators which have the transducer resonant frequencies and harmonic frequencies are connected through relays to the transducer array. One generator with the output frequency that most closely producers the optimum energy in each cavitation implosion for the current process chemistry is switched to the transducer array.
In yet another aspect, the invention reduces or eliminates low frequency beat resonances created by multiple generators by synchronizing the sweep rates (both in magnitude and in phase) so that there is zero frequency difference between the signals coming out of multiple generators. In one aspect, the synchronization of sweep rate magnitude and phase is accomplished by sending a timing signal from one generator to each of the other generators. In another aspect, a master FM signal is generated that is sent to each "slave" power module, which amplifies the master FM signal for delivery to the transducers. At times, the master and slave aspect of the invention also provides advantages in eliminating or reducing the beat frequency created by multiple generators driving a single tank.
However, when multiple generators are driving different tanks in the same system, this master and slave aspect may not be acceptable because the AM of the FM signal is usually different for different processes in the different tanks. Accordingly, and in another aspect, a master control is provided which solves this problem. The master control of the invention has a single FM function generator (sweeping frequency signal) and multiple AM function generators, one for each tank. Thus, every tank in the system receives the same magnitude and phase of sweep rate, but a different AM as set on the control for each generator.
The invention also provides other advantages as compared to the prior art's methods for frequency sweeping ultrasound within the transducer's bandwidth. Specifically, the invention provides a sweeping of the sweep rate, within the transducer's bandwidth, such that low frequency resonances are reduced or eliminated. Prior art frequency sweep systems had a fixed sweep frequency that is selectable, once, for a given application. One problem with such prior art systems is that the single low frequency can set up a resonance in a delicate part, for example, a read-write head for a hard disk drive.
The invention also provides advantages in that the sweep frequency of the sweep rate can be adjusted to conditions within the tank, or to the configuration of the tank or transducer, or even to a process chemistry. The invention also has certain advantages over prior art single chamber ultrasound systems. Specifically, the methods of the invention, in certain aspects, use different frequency ultrasonics for each different chemistry so that the same optimum energy in each cavitation implosion is maintained in each process or cleaning chemistry. According to other aspects of the invention, this process is enhanced by selecting the proper ultrasonic generator frequency that is supplied at the fundamental or harmonic frequency of the transducers bonded to the single ultiasonic chamber.
These and other aspects and advantages of the invention are evident in the description which follows and in the accompanying drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
A more complete understanding of the invention may be obtained by reference to the drawings, in which: Figure 1 shows a cut-away side view schematic of an ultrasound processing system constructed according to the invention;
Figure 1A shows a top view schematic of the system of Figure 1;
Figure 2 shows a schematic illustration of a multi-transducer system constructed according to the invention and used to generate broadband ultrasound in a combined bandwidth; Figure 2A graphically illustrates the acoustic disturbances produced by the two transducers of Figure 2; Figure 2B graphically illustrates the broadband acoustic disturbances produced by harmonics of a multi-transducer system constructed according to the invention;
Figure 3 shows a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a system constructed according to the invention;
Figure 4 shows a schematic embodiment of the signal section of the system of Figure 3;
Figure 5 shows a schematic embodiment of the power module section of the system of Figure 3; Figure 6 is a cross-sectional side view of a harmonic transducer constructed according to the invention and driven by the power module of Figure 5; Figure 6A is a top view of the harmonic transducer of Figure 6;
Figure 7 is a schematic illustration of an amplitude control subsystem constructed according to the invention; Figure 7A shows illustrative amplitude control signals generated by an amplitude control subsystem such as in Figure 7;
Figure 8 shows a schematic illustration of an AM sweep subsystem constructed according to the invention; Figure 8A shows a typical AM frequency generated by an AM generator; Figure 8B graphically shows AM sweep frequency as a function of time for a representative sweep rate, in accord with the invention;
Figure 9 illustrates a multi-generator, multi-frequency, single tank ultrasound system constructed according to the invention; Figure 9A illustrates another multi- generator, single tank system constructed according to the invention;
Figure 10 illustrates a multi-generator, common-frequency, single tank ultrasound system constructed according to the invention;
Figure 11 illustrates a multi-tank ultrasound system constructed according to the invention; Figure HA shows representative AM waveform patterns as controlled through the system of Figure 11; and
Figures 12A, 12B and 12C graphically illustrate methods of sweeping the sweep rate in accord with the invention.
Detailed Description of Illustrated Embodiments
Figures 1 and 1A show schematic side and top views, respectively, of an ultrasound processing system 10 constructed according to the invention. An ultrasonic generator 12 electrically connects, via electrical paths 14a, 14b, to an ultrasound transducer 16 to drive the transducer 16 at ultrasound frequencies above about lδkhz, and usually between 40khz and 350khz. Though not required, the transducer 16 is shown in Figure 1 as an array of transducer elements 18. Typically, such elements 18 are made from ceramic, piezoelectric, or magnetostrictive materials which expand and contract with applied voltages or current to create ultrasound. The transducer 16 is mounted to the bottom, to the sides, or within the ultrasound treatment tank 20 through conventional methods, such as known to those skilled in the art and as described above. A liquid 22 fills the tank to a level sufficient to cover the delicate part 24 to be processed and /or cleaned. In operation, the generator 12 drives the transducer 16 to create acoustic energy 26 that couples into the liquid 22.
Although the transducer 16 is shown mounted to the bottom of the tank 20, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other mounting configurations are possible and envisioned. The transducer elements 18 are of conventional design, and are preferably "clamped" so as to compress the piezoelectric transducer material.
Figure 2 illustrates a two transducer system 30. Transducer 32a, 32b are similar to one of the elements 18, Figure 1. Transducer 32a includes two ceramic sandwiched elements 34, a steel back plate 38a, and a front drive plate 36a that is mounted to the tank 20'. Transducer 32b includes two ceramic sandwiched elements 34, a steel back plate 38b, and a front drive plate 36b that is mounted to the tank 20'. Bolts 39a, 39b pass through the plates 38a, 38b and screw into the drive plates 36a, 36b, respectively, to compresses the ceramics 34. The transducers 32 are illustratively shown mounted to a tank surface 20'.
The transducers 32a, 32b are driven by a common generator such as generator 12 of Figure 1. Alternatively, multiple generators can be used. The ceramics 34 are oriented with positive "+" orientations together or minus "-" orientations together to obtain cooperative expansion and contraction within each transducer 32. Lead-outs 42 illustrate the electrical connections which connect between the generator and the transducers 32 so as to apply a differential voltage there-across. The bolts 39a, 39b provide a conduction path between the bottoms 43 and tops 45 of the transducers 32 to connect the similar electrodes (here shown as -, -) of the elements 34.
The thicknesses 40a, 40b of transducers 32a, 32b, respectively, determine the transducer's fundamental resonant frequency. For purposes of illustration, transducer 32a has a fundamental frequency of 40khz, and transducer 32b has a fundamental frequency of 44khz. Transducers 32a, 32b each have a finite ultrasound bandwidth which can be adjusted, slightly, by those skilled in the art. Typically, however, the bandwidths are about 4khz. By choosing the correct fundamental frequencies, therefore, an overlap between the bandwidths of the two transducers 32a, 32b can occur, thereby adding additional range within which to apply ultrasound 26a', 26b' to liquid 22'.
The acoustic energy 26' applied to the liquid 22' by the combination of transducers 32a, 32b is illustrated graphically in Figure 2A. In Figure 2A, the "x" axis represents frequency, and the "y" axis represents acoustical power. The outline 44 represents the bandwidth of transducer 32a, and outline 46 represents the bandwidth of transducer 32b. Together, they produce a combined bandwidth 43 which produces a relatively flat acoustical energy profile to the liquid 22', such as illustrated by profile 48. The flatness of the bandwidth 43 representing the acoustical profile 48 of the two transducers 32a, 32b is preferably within a factor of two of any other acoustical strength within the combined bandwidth 43. That is, if the FWHM defines the bandwidth 43; the non-uniformity in the profile 48 across the bandwidth 43 is typically better than this amount. In certain cases, the profile 48 between the two bandwidths 44 and 46 is substantially flat, such as illustrated in Figure 2A.
The generator connected to lead-outs 42 drives the transducers 32a, 32b at frequencies within the bandwidth 43 to obtain broadband acoustical disturbances within the liquid 22'. As described herein, the manner in which these frequencies are varied to obtain the overall disturbance is important. Most preferably, the generator sweeps the frequencies through the overall bandwidth, and at the same time sweeps the rate at which those frequencies are changed. That is, one preferred generator of the invention has a "sweep rate" that sweeps through the frequencies within the bandwidth 43; and that sweep rate is itself varied as a function of time. In alternative embodiments of the invention, the sweep rate is varied linearly, randomly, and as some other function of time to optimize the process conditions within the tank 20'.
With further reference to Figures 1 and 1A, each of the elements 18 can have a representative bandwidth such as illustrated in Figure 2A. Accordingly, an even larger bandwidth 43 can be created with three or more transducers such as illustrated by transducers 32a, 32b. In particular, any number of combined transducers can be used. Preferably, the bandwidths of all the combined transducers overlap to provide an integrated bandwidth such as profile 48 of Figure 2A. As such, each transducer making up the combined bandwidth should have a unique resonant frequency.
Those skilled in the art understand that each of the transducers 18 and 32a, 32b, Figures 1 and 2A, respectively, have harmonic frequencies which occur at higher mechanical resonances of the primary resonant frequency. It is one preferred embodiment of the invention that such transducers operate at one of these harmonics, i.e., typically the first, second, third or fourth harmonic, so as to function in the frequency range of lOOkhz to 350khz. This frequency range provides a more favorable environment for acoustic processes within the tanks 20, 20' as compared to low frequency disturbances less than lOOkhz. For example, ultrasound frequencies around the 40khz frequency can easily cause cavitation damage in the part 24. Further, such frequencies tend to create standing waves and other hot spots of spatial cavitation within the liquid. Accordingly, the benefits of applying a broadband acoustic disturbance to the liquid also apply to the 100-350khz microsonic frequencies. Similar to Figure 2A, Figure 2B illustrates a combined bandwidth 50 of harmonic frequencies in the range 100-350khz. Specifically, Figure 2B shows the combined bandwidth 50 that is formed by the bandwidth 44' around the second harmonic of the 40Khz frequency, and the bandwidth 46' around the second harmonic of the 41.5khz frequency.
Figure 3 shows in block diagram embodiment of a system 110 constructed according to the present invention. The system 110 includes a signal section 112 which drives a power module 121. The power module 121 powers the harmonic transducer array 122. The transducer array 122 are coupled to a liquid 123 by one of several conventional means so as to generate acoustic energy within the liquid 123.
By way of example, the array 122 is similar to the array 16 of Figure 1; and the liquid 123 is similar to the liquid 22 of Figure 1.
The signal section 112 includes a triangle wave oscillator 114 with a frequency typically below 150 hz. The purpose of the oscillator 114 is to provide a signal that sweeps the sweep rate of the ultrasound frequencies generated by the transducer arrays 122. The oscillator 114 is fed into the input of the sweep rate VCO 115 (Voltage Controlled Oscillator). This causes the frequency of the output of VCO 115 to linearly sweep at the frequency of the oscillator 114 The optimum sweep rate frequency output of VCO 115 is typically from about lOhz, for magnetostrictive elements, to about 1.2khz, for piezoelectπcs. Therefore, the optimum center sweep rate frequency can be anywhere within the range of about lOhz to 1.2khz, and that sweep rate is varied within a finite range of frequencies about the center sweep frequency. This finite range is typically set to about 10-50% of the center sweep rate frequency. For example, the center sweep rate frequency for one process might be 455hz, so the VCO 115 output is set, for example, to sweep from 380 hz to 530 hz. If, additionally, the oscillator 114 is set to 37hz, then the output of VCO 115 changes frequency, linearly, from 380hz to 530hz, and back to 380hz at thirty seven times per second
The output of VCO 115 feeds the VCO input of the 2 X center frequency VCO 116. The VCO 116 operates as follows. If, for example, the center frequency of VCO 116 is set to 208khz and the bandwidth is set to 8khz, the center frequency linearly changes from 204khz to 212khz and back to 212khz in a time of 1.9 milliseconds (i.e., l/530hz) to 2.63 milliseconds (i.e., l /380hz) The specific time is determined by the voltage output of the oscillator 114 at the time of measurement. Since the voltage 0 output of oscillator 114 is constantly changing, the time it takes to linearly sweep the center frequency from 204khz to 212khz and back to 204khz is also constantly changing. In this example, the time changes linearly from 1.9ms to 2.63ms and back to 1.9ms at thirty seven times per second.
The oscillator 114, VCO 115 and VCO 116 operate, in combination, to 5 eliminate the repetition of a single sweep rate frequency in the range of lOhz to
1.2khz. For example, the highest single frequency that exists in the stated example system is 37hz. If an unusual application or process were found whereby a very low frequency resonance around 37hz exists, then the oscillator 114 would be replaced by a random voltage generator to reduce the hklihood of exciting any modes within o the part.
The VCO 116 drives a divide-by-two D flip-flop 117. The purpose of the D flip-flop 117 is to eliminate asymmetries in the waveform from the VCO 116 The output of the D flip-flop 117 is thus a square wave that has the desired frequency which changes at a sweep rate that is itself sweeping. In the stated example, the output square wave from D flip-flop 117 linearly changes from 102khz to 106khz and back to 102khz at different times in the range of 1.9ms to 2.63ms. This sweeping of the sweep rate is sometimes referred to herein as "double sweep" or "double sweeping."
The AC line zero-crossover detection circuit 118 produces a signal with a rise time or narrow pulse at or near the time that the AC line voltage is at zero or at a low voltage, i.e., at or near zero degrees. This signal triggers the adjustable monstable multivibrator 119. The timed pulse out of monostable multivibrator 119 is set to a value between zero degrees and ninety degrees, which corresponds to a time from zero to 4.17ms for a 60hz line frequency.
If the maximum amplitude were desired, for example, the monostable multivibrator 119 is set to a time of 4.17ms for a 60hz line frequency. For an amplitude that is 50% of maximum, the monostable multivibrator 119 is set to 1.389ms for a 60hz line frequency. In general, the monostable multivibrator 119 time is set to the arcsin of the amplitude percent times the period of the line frequency divided by 360 degrees.
The double sweeping square wave output of the D flip-flop 117 and the timed pulse output of the monostable multivibrator 119 feed into the synchronization logic 120. The synchronization logic 120 performs three primary functions. First, it only allows the double sweeping square wave to pass to the output of the synchronization logic 120 during the time defined by the pulse from the monostable multivibrator 119. Second, the synchronization logic 20 always allows a double sweeping square wave which starts to be completed, even if the monostable multivibrator 19 times out in the middle of a double sweeping square wave . And lastly, the synchronization logic 120 always starts a double sweeping square wave at the beginning of the ultrasonic frequency, i.e., at zero degrees.
The output of synchronization logic 120 is a double sweeping square wave that exists only during the time defined by the monostable multivibrator 119 or for a fraction of a cycle past the end of the monostable multivibrator 119 time period. The synchronization logic 120 output feeds a power module 121 which amplifies the pulsed double sweeping square wave to an appropriate power level to drive the harmonic transducers 122. The transducers 122 are typically bonded to a tank and deliver sound waves into the liquid within the tank. These sound waves duplicate the pulsed double sweeping characteristics of the output of the signal section 112. Figure 4 shows a schematic embodiment of the signal section 112 in Figure 3.
Ul is a XR-2209 precision oscillator with a triangle wave output at pin 8. The frequency of the XR-2209 is 1 /(RC) = l / ((27k) (l μf)) = 37hz. This sets the frequency of the triangle wave oscillator 114, Figure 3, to sweep the sweep rate at 37hz. The other components associated with the XR-2209 are the standard configuration for single supply operation of this integrated circuit.
U2 is a XR-2209 precision oscillator with a triangle wave output at pin8. The center frequency of U2 is 1 / (RC) = l / ((2.2k) (lμf)) = 455 hz. The actual output frequency is proportional to the current flowing out of pin4 of U2. At 455hz, this current is 6volts/2.2k = 2.73ma. It is generally desirable, according to the invention, to sweep the 455 hz sweep rate through a total change of 150hz, i.e., 75 hz either side of 455hz. Since 75hz /455 hz = 16.5%, the current flowing out of pin 4 must change by 16.5% in each direction, that is, by (16.5%) (2.73ma) = 0.45ma. The triangle wave from Ul causes this change. The triangle wave changes from 3volts to 9volts; therefore, there is 3volts on either side of 6volts at pin4 of U2 to cause the 0.45ma change. By making RI = 3volts/0.45ma = 6.67kΩ, the sweep rate is changed 75hz either side of 455hz. The actual RI used in Figure 4 is 6.65kΩ, a commercially available value giving an actual change of 75.2hz.
U3 is a XR-2209 precision oscillator with a center frequency of approximately 1 / (RC) = l / ((12k + 2.5k) (330pf)) = 209khz with the potentiometer set to its center position of 2.5kΩ. In the actual circuit, the potentiometer is adjusted to about 100Ω higher to give the desired 208khz center frequency. Out of U3 pin4 flows 6volts/(12kΩ + 2.5kΩ + 100Ω) -= 0.41ma. To change the center frequency a total of 8khz, the 0.41ma is changed by 4khz /208khz - 1.92%, or 7.88μa. This means that R2 = 3volts/7.88μa = 381kΩ. In Figure 4, however, the commercial value of 383kΩ was used. U3 pin7 has a square wave output that is changing from 204khz to 212khz and back to 204khz at a rate between 380hz and 530hz. The actual rate is constantly changing thirty seven times a second as determined by Ul.
U4 is a D flip-flop in a standard divide by two configuration. It squares up any non 50% duty cycle from U3 and provides a frequency range of 102khz to 106khz from the 204khz to 212khz U3 signal.
The output of U4 feeds the synchronization logic which is described below and after the description of the generation of the amplitude control signal.
The two 1N4002 diodes in conjunction with the bridge rectifier form a full wave half sinusoid signal at the input to the 40106 Schmidt trigger inverter. This inventor triggers when the half sinusoid reaches about 7volts, which on a half sinusoid with an amplitude of 16 times the square root of two is close enough to the zero crossover for a trigger point in a practical circuit. The output of the 40106 Schmidt trigger falls which triggers U5, the edge triggered 4538 monostable multivibrator wired in a trailing edge trigger/ retriggerable configuration. The output of U5 goes high for a period determined by the setting on the 500kΩ potentiometer. At the end of this period, the output of U5 goes low. The period is chosen by setting the 500kΩ potentiometer to select that portion of the leading one- quarter sinusoid that ends at the required amplitude to give amplitude control. This timed positive pulse feeds into the synchronization logic along with the square wave output of U4.
The timed pulse U5 feeds the D input of U6, a 4013 D-type flip flop. The square wave from U4 is invented by U7a and feeds the clock input of U6. U6 only transfers the signal on the D input to the output Q at the rise of a pulse on the clock input, Pin3. Therefore, the Q output of U6 on Pinl is high when the D input of U6 on Pin3 is high and the clock input of U6 on Pin3 transitions high. This change in the Q output of U6 is therefore synchronized with the change in the square wave from U4.
The synchronized high Q output of U6 feeds U8 Pinl3, a 4093 Schmidt trigger NAND gate. The high level on Pinl3 of U8 allows the square wave signal to pass from U8 Pinl2 to the output of U8 at Pinll. In a similar way, U8 synchronizes the falling output from U5 with the square wave from U4. Therefore, only complete square waves pass to U8 Pinll and only during the time period as chosen by monostable multivibrator U5. The 4049 buffer driver U7b inverts the output at U8 Pinll so it has the same phase as the square wave output from U4. This signal, U7b Pin2 is now the proper signal to be amplified to drive the transducers.
Figure 5 is a circuit that increases the signal from U7b Pin 2 in Figure 4 to a power level for driving the transducers 122, Figure 3. There are three isolated power supplies. The first one, including a Tl, a bridge, C19, VR1 and C22, produces +12VDC for the input logic. The second and third isolated power supplies produce +15 VDC at VR2 Pin3 and VR3 Pin3 for gate drive to the IGBT's (insulated gate bipolar transistors).
The signal input to Figure 5 has its edges sharpened by the 40106 Schmidt trigger U9a. The output of U9a feeds the 4049 buffer drivers UlOc and UlOd which drive optical isolator and IGBT driver U12, a Hewlett Packard HCPL3120. Also, the output of U9a is inverted by U9b and feeds buffer drivers UlOa and UlOb which drive Ull, another HCPL3120.
This results in an isolated drive signal on the output of Ull and the same signal on the output of U12, only 180° out of phase. Therefore, Ull drives Ql on while U12 drives Q2 off. In this condition, a power half sinusoid of current flows from the high voltage full wave DC at Bl through Dl and Ql and LI into Cl. Current cannot reverse because it is blocked by Dl and the off Q2. When the input signal changes state, Ull turns off Ql and U12 turns on Q2, a half sinusoid of current flow out of Cl through L2 and D2 and Q2 back into Cl in the opposite polarity. This ends a complete cycle.
The power signal across Cl couples through the high frequency isolation transformer T4. The output of T4 is connected to the transducer or transducer array.
Figure 6 shows a cross-sectional side view of one clamped microsonic transducer 128 constructed according to the invention; while Figure 6A shows a top view of the microsonic transducer 128. The microsonic transducer 128 has a second harmonic resonant frequency of 104khz with a 4khz bandwidth (i.e., from 102khz to 106khz). The cone-shaped backplate 139 flattens the impedance verses frequency curve to broaden the frequency bandwidth of the microsonic transducer 128. Specifically, the backplate thickness along the "T" direction changes for translational positions along direction "X." Since the harmonic resonance of the microsonic transducer 128 changes as a function of backplate thickness, the conical plate 139 broadens and flattens the microsonic transducer's operational bandwidth.
The ceramic 134 of microsonic transducer 128 is driven through oscillatory voltages transmitted across the electrodes 136. The electrodes 136 connect to an ultrasonic generator (not shown), such as described above, by insulated electrical connections 138. The ceramic 134 is held under compression through operation of the bolt 132. Specifically, the bolt 132 provides 5,000 pounds of compressive force on the piezoelectric ceramic 134.
Amplitude control according to one embodiment of the invention is illustrated in Figures 7 and 7A. Specifically, Figure 7 shows an amplitude control subsystem 140 that provides amplitude control by selecting a portion of the rectified line voltage 145 which drives the ultrasonic generator amplitude select section 146. The signal section 112, Figure 3, and particularly the monostable multivibrator 119 and synchronization logic 120, provide similar functionality. In Figure 7, the amplitude control subsystem 140 operates with the ultiasonic generator 142 and connects with the power line voltage 138. The rectification section 144 changes the ac to dc so as to provide the rectified signal 145.
The amplitude select section 146 selects a portion of the leading quarter sinusoid of rectified signal 145 that ends at the desired amplitude, here shown as amplitude "A," in a region 148 between zero and 90° and in a region 150 between 180° and 270° of the signal 145. In this manner, the amplitude modulation 152 is selectable in a controlled manner as applied to the signal 154 driving the transducers
156 from the generator 142, such as discussed in connection with Figures 3 and 4.
Figure 7A shows illustrative selections of amplitude control in accord with the invention. The AC line 158 is first converted to a full wave signal 160 by the rectifier 144. Thereafter, the amplitude select section 146 acquires the signal amplitude selectively. For example, by selecting the maximum amplitude of 90° in the first quarter sinusoid, and 270° in the third quarter sinusoid, a maximum amplitude signal 162 is provided. Similarly, a one-half amplitude signal 164 is generated by choosing the 30° and 210° locations of the same sinusoids. By way of a further example, a one-third amplitude signal 166 is generated by choosing 19.5° and
199.5°, respectively, of the same sinusoids.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the rectification section 144 can also be a half-wave rectifier. As such, the signal 145 will only have a response every other one-half cycle. In this case, amplitude control is achieved by selecting a portion of the leading quarter sinusoid that ends at a selected amplitude between zero and
90° of the sinusoid.
The ultrasonic generator of the invention is preferably amplitude modulated. Through AM control, various process characteristics within the tank can be optimized. The AM control can be implemented such as described in Figures 3,4,7 and 7A, or through other prior art techniques such as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,736,130.
This "sweeping" of the AM frequency is accomplished in a manner that is similar to ultrasonic generators which sweep the frequency within the bandwidth of an ultrasonic transducer. By way of example, U.S. Patent No. 4,736,130 describes one ultrasonic generator which provides variable selection of the AM frequency through sequential "power burst" generation and "quiet time" during a power train time. In accord with the invention, the AM frequency is changed to "sweep" the frequency in a pattern so as to provide an AM sweep rate pattern.
Figure 8 illustrates an AM sweep subsystem 170 constructed according to the invention. The AM sweep subsystem 170 operates as part of, or in conjunction with, the ultrasonic generator 172. The AM generator 174 provides an AM signal 175 with a selectable frequency. The increment/ decrement section 176 commands the AM generator 174 over command line 177 to change its frequency over a preselected time period so as to "sweep" the AM frequency in the output signal 178 which drives the transducers 180.
U.S. Patent No. 4,736,130 describes one AM generator 56, Figure 1, that is suitable for use as the generator 174 of Figure 8. By way of example, Figure 8A illustrates one selectable AM frequency signal 182 formed through successive 500μs power bursts and 300μs quiet times to generate a 1.25khz signal (e.g., l /(300μs -t- 500μs)=1.25khz). If, for example, the AM frequency is swept at 500hz about a center frequency of 1.25khz, such as shown in Figure 8, then the frequency is commanded to vary between 1.25khz + 250hz and 1.25khz - 250hz, such as illustrated in Figure 8B. Figure 8B illustrates a graph of AM frequency versus time for this example.
Figure 9 schematically illustrates a multi-generator, single tank system 200 5 constructed according to the invention. In many instances, it is desirable to select an ultrasound frequency 201 that most closely achieves the cavitation implosion energy which cleans, but does not damage, the delicate part 202. In a single tank system such as in Figure 9, the chemistries within the tank 210 are changed, from time to time, so that the desired or optimum ultrasound frequency changes. The transducers o and generators of the prior art do not operate or function at all frequencies, so system 200 has multiple generators 206 and transducers 208 that provide different frequencies. By way of example, generator 206a can provide a 40khz primary resonant frequency; while generator 206b can provide the first harmonic 72khz frequency. Generator 206c can provide, for example, 104khz microsonic operation. 5 In the illustrated example, therefore, the generators 206a, 206b, 206c operate, respectively, at 40khz, 72khz, and 104khz. Each transducer 208 responds at each of these frequencies so that, in tandem, the transducers generate ultrasound 201 at the same frequency to fill the tank 210 with the proper frequency for the particular chemistry. 0 In addition, each of the generators 206a-206c can and do preferably sweep the frequencies about the transducers' bandwidth centered about the frequencies 40khz, 72khz, and 104khz, respectively; and they further sweep the sweep rate within these bandwidths to reduce or eliminate resonances which might occur at the optimum sweep rate. 5 When the tank 210 is filled with a new chemistry, the operator selects the optimum frequency through the mux select section 212. The mux select section connects to the analog multiplexer ("mux") 214 which connects to each generator 206. Specifically, each generator 206 couples through the mux 214 in a switching network that permits only one active signal line 216 to the transducers 208. For o example, if the operator at mux select section 212 chooses microsonic operation to optimize the particular chemistry in the tank 210, generator 206c is connected through the mux 214 and drives each transducer 208a-208c to generate microsonic ultrasound 201 which fills the tank 210. If, however, generator 206a is selected, then each of the transducers 208 are driven with 40khz ultrasound.
Figure 9A illustrates another single tank, multi-generator system 200' constructed according to the invention. Specifically, like in Figure 9, each of the generators 206' provides a different frequency. However, each generator 206' connects to drive unique transducer arrays 208' within the tank 210'. In this manner, for example, generator 206a' is selected to generate 40khz ultrasound 201a in the tank 210'; generator 206b' is selected to generate 72khz ultrasound 201b in the tank 210'; and generator 206c is selected to generate 104khz microsonics 201c in the tank 210'. These generator/ transducer pairs 206a'/208a', 206b'/208b' and 206c' / 208c' do not generally operate at the same time; but rather are selected according to the process chemistries and part 202' in the tank 210'.
Those skilled in the art should appreciate that each of the generators 206 can be replaced by multiple generators operating at the same or similar frequency. This is sometimes needed to provide additional power to the tank 210 at the desired frequency. Those skilled in the art should also appreciate that the mux 214 can be designed in several known methods, and that techniques to do so abound in the art.
Figure 10 illustrates a multi-generator, common frequency ultrasound system
230 constructed according to the invention. In Figure 10, a plurality of generators 232 (232a-232c) connect through signal lines 234 (234a-234c) to drive associated transducers 238 (238a-238c) in a common tank 236. Each of the transducers 238 and generators 232 operate at the same frequency, and are preferably swept through a range of frequencies such as described above so as to reduce or eliminate resonances within the tank 236 (and within the part 242). In order to eliminate "beating" between ultrasound energies 240a-240c of the the several transducers 238a-238c and generators 232a-232c, the generators 232 are each driven by a common FM signal 250 such as generated by the master signal generator 244. The FM signal is coupled to each generator through signal divider 251. In operation, system 230 permits the coupling of identical frequencies, in amplitude and phase, into the tank 236 by the several transducers 238. Accordingly, unwanted beating effects are eliminated. The signal 250 is swept with FM control through the desired ultrasound bandwidth of the several transducers to eliminate resonances within the tank 236; and that sweep rate frequency is preferably swept to eliminate any low frequency resonances which can result from the primary sweep frequency. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that system 230 of Figure 10 can additionally include or employ other features such as described herein, such as AM modulation and sweep, AM control, and broadband transducer.
Figure 11 illustrates a multi-tank system 260 constructed according to the invention. One or more generators 262 drive each tank 264 (here illustrated, generators 262a and 262b drive tank 264a; and generators 264c and 264d drive tank 264b). Each of the generators 262 connects to an associated ultrasound transducer 266a-d so as to produce ultrasound 268a-d in the associated tanks 264a-b.
The common master signal generator 270 provides a common FM signal 272 for each of the generators 262. Thereafter, ultrasound generators 262a-b generate ultrasound 268a-b that is identical in amplitude and phase, such as described above. Similarly, generators 262c-d generate ultrasound 268c-d that is identical in amplitude and phase. However, unlike above, the generators 262 each have an AM generator 274 that functions as part of the generator 262 so as to select an optimum AM frequency within the tanks 264. In addition, the AM generators 274 preferably sweep through the AM frequencies so as to eliminate resonances at the AM frequency.
More particularly, generators 274a-b generate and / or sweep through identical frequencies of the AM in tank 264a; while generators 274c-d generate and /or sweep through identical frequencies of AM in tank 264b. However, the AM frequency and /or AM sweep of the paired generators 274a-b need not be the same as the AM frequency and /or AM sweep of the paired generators 274c-d. Each of the generators 274 operate at the same carrier frequency as determined by the FM signal 270; however each paired generator set 274a-b and 274c-d operates independently from the other set so as to create the desired process characteristics within the associated tank 264.
Accordingly, the system 260 eliminates or prevents undesirable cross-talk or resonances between the two tanks 264a-b. Since the generators within all tanks 264 operate at the same signal frequency 270, there is no effective beating between tanks which could upset or destroy the desired cleaning and /or processing characteristics within the tanks 264. As such, the system 260 reduces the likelihood of creating damaging resonances within the parts 280a-b. It is apparent to those skilled in the art that the FM control 270 can contain the four AM controls 274a-d instead of the illustrated configuration.
Figure 11 A shows two AM patterns 300a, 300b that illustrate ultrasound delivered to multiple tanks such as shown in Figure 11. For example, AM pattern 300a represents the ultrasound 268a of Figurell; while AM pattern 300b represents the ultrasound 268c of Figure 11. With a common FM carrier 302, as provided by the master generator 270, Figure 11, the ultrasound frequencies 302 can be synchronized so as to eliminate beating between tanks 264a, 264b. Further, the separate AM generators 274a and 274c provide capability so as to select the magnitude of the AM frequency shown by the envelope waveform 306. As illustrated, for example, waveform 306a has a different magnitude 308 as compared to the magnitude 310 of waveform 306b. Further, generators 374a, 374c can change the periods 310a, 310b, respectively, of each of the waveforms 306a, 306b selectively so as to change the AM frequency within each tank.
Figures 12A, 12B and 12C graphically illustrate the methods of sweeping the sweep rate, in accord with the invention. In particular, Figure 12A shows an illustrative condition of a waveform 350 that has a center frequency of 40khz and that is varied about the center frequency so as to "sweep" the frequency as a function of time along the time axis 352. Figure 12B illustrates FM control of the waveform 354 which has a varying period 356 specified in terms of time. For example, a 42khz period occurs in 23.8μs while a 40khz period occurs in 25μs. The regions 358a, 358b are shown for ease of illustration and represent, respectively, compressed periods of time within which the system sweeps the waveform 354 through many frequencies from 42khz to 40khz, and through many frequencies from 40khz to 38khz. Figure 12c graphically shows a triangle pattern 360 which illustrates the variation of sweep rate frequency along a time axis 362. Appendix A contains, for disclosure purposes, additional detail and combinations of the invention as presented in claims A1-A77.
The invention thus attains the objects set forth above, among those apparent from preceding description. Since certain changes may be made in the above apparatus and methods without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawing be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
It is also to be understood that the following claims are to cover all generic and specific features of the invention described herein, and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall there between.
Having described the invention, what is claimed is:

Claims

1. A system for delivering broadband ultrasound to liquid, comprising: first and second ultrasonic transducers, the first transducer having a first frequency and a first ultrasound bandwidth, the second transducer having a second frequency and a second ultrasound bandwidth, the first and second bandwidths being overlapping with each other, the first frequency being different from the second frequency; and ultrasound generator means for driving the transducers at frequencies within the bandwidths , the first and second transducers and the generator means being constructed and arranged so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than either of the first or second bandwidths.
2. A system according to claim 1, further comprising a third ultiasonic transducer having a third frequency and a third ultrasound bandwidth, the third bandwidth being overlapping with at least one of the other bandwidths, the third frequency being different from the first and second frequencies, and wherein the generator means comprises means for driving the third transducer within the third bandwidth so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than either of the first, second or third bandwidths.
3. A system according to claim 1, wherein the first frequency is about 40khz and the first bandwidth is about 4.1khz, and wherein the second frequency is about 44khz and the second bandwidth is about 4.2khz, the ultrasound having a combined bandwidth of at least about 8khz.
4. A system according to claim 1, further comprising clamping means for applying compression to at least one of the transducers.
5. A system according to claim 1, wherein the first and second frequencies are harmonic frequencies.
6. A system according to claim 5, wherein the harmonic frequencies are between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
7. A system according to claim 1, further comprising at least one other synergistic ultrasonic transducer having a synergistic frequency and a synergistic ultrasound bandwidth, the synergistic bandwidth being overlapping with at least one of the other bandwidths, the synergistic frequency being different from the first and second frequencies, and wherein the generator means comprises means for driving the synergistic transducer within the synergistic bandwidth so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than any of the other bandwidths.
8. A system according to claim 7, wherein the synergistic frequency is a harmonic resonant frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
9. A system according to claims 1,2, 5, 7 or 8, wherein the bandwidths overlap so that, in combination, the transducers produce ultrasonic energy at substantially all frequencies within the combined bandwidth.
10. A system according to claims 1,2, 5, 7 or 8, wherein the bandwidths overlap so that the transducers and generator means produce ultiasonic energy, at each " frequency, that is within a factor of two of ultrasonic energy produced by the transducers and generator means at any other frequency within the combined bandwidth.
11. A system according to claims 1,2, 5, 7 or 8, wherein the bandwidths overlap so that the transducers and generator means produce ultrasonic energy, at each frequency, that is substantially equal to the ultiasonic energy produced by the transducers and generator means at any other frequency within the combined bandwidth.
12. A system for delivering ultrasound to liquid, comprising: an ultrasonic transducer having a harmonic frequency within an ultrasound bandwidth, the frequency being between about lOOkhz and 350khz; clamping means for applying compression to the transducer; and ultiasound generator means for driving the transducer at one or more frequencies within the bandwidth, the transducer and the generator means being constructed and arranged so as to produce ultiasound within the liquid.
13. A system according to claim 12, further comprising at least one other ultrasonic transducer having a second harmonic frequency within a second bandwidth, the second frequency being between about lOOkhz and 350khz, the second bandwidth being overlapping, in frequency, with the ultrasound bandwidth, and wherein the generator means comprises means for driving the tiansducers at frequencies within the bandwidths, the transducers and the generator means being constructed and arranged so as to produce ultiasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than the bandwidth of a single transducer.
14. A system for delivering ultrasound to liquid, comprising: one or more ultrasonic transducers, each transducer having an operating frequency within an ultrasound bandwidth; and ultrasound generator means for driving the tiansducers at frequencies within the bandwidth, the generator means having frequency sweep means for sweeping the frequency through the bandwidth at a substantially non-constant sweep rate to reduce low frequency resonances in the liquid, the generator means and tiansducers being constructed and arranged so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid.
15. A system according to claim 14, wherein the frequency sweep means comprises means for sweeping the frequency within the bandwidth at a sweep rate that varies as a function of time.
16. A system according to claim 14, wherein the frequency sweep means comprises means for linearly sweeping the sweep rate as a function of time.
17 A system according to claim 14, wherein the frequency sweep means comprises means for sweeping the frequency within the bandwidth at a random sweep rate.
18 A system according to claim 14, wherein the frequency sweep means comprises means for sweeping the sweep rate within a range around a center sweep rate frequency, the center sweep rate frequency being between about lhz to 1.2khz, the range being between about 10-50% of the center sweep rate frequency.
19 A system according to claim 14, wherein the frequency sweep means compπses means for continually changing the sweep rate frequency so as to optimize processing characteristics within the liquid.
20 A system according to claim 14, further comprising clamping means for applying compression to at least one of the tiansducers.
21 A system according to claim 14, wherein the operating frequency is a harmonic frequency of each tiansducer, the harmonic frequency being between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
22 A system according to claim 14, wherein the system comprises at least two transducers, each transducer having an operating harmonic frequency within an operating bandwidth, the operating harmonic frequency being between about lOOkhz and 350khz, each operating bandwidth being overlapping with the bandwidth of at least one other transducer, the transducers and the generator means being constructed and arranged so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than the bandwidth of a single transducer
23 A generator for driving at least one ultrasonic transducer with a variable sweep rate, composing- frequency generation means for dπving the transducer at an operational frequency within a range of frequencies that are centered about a resonant frequency of the tiansducer; sweep rate means for sweeping the operational frequency through the range of frequencies at a sweep rate frequency; and double sweep rate means for sweeping the sweep rate frequency through a range of frequencies about the sweep rate frequency so that the sweep rate is substantially non-constant.
24. A generator according to claim 23, wherein the resonant frequency is a harmonic frequency within the range lOOkhz to 350khz.
25. A generator according to claim 23, wherein the double sweep rate means comprises means for sweeping the sweep rate through a range of frequencies within about 10-50% of the sweep rate frequency.
26. A generator according to claim 25, wherein the double sweep rate means comprises means for sweeping the sweep rate at a frequency of less than about 10% of the sweep frequency.
27. A generator according to claims 25 or 26, wherein the sweep rate frequency is between about lhz and 1.2khz.
28. A generator according to claim 23, further comprising means for connecting the generator to a power line having a power line frequency, and further comprising AM control means for modulating the operational frequency with an AM amplitude, said AM control means rectifying the power line frequency and selecting a portion of a sinusoid of the rectified power line frequency to adjust the AM amplitude selectively.
29. A generator according to claim 23, further comprising AM control means for
(a) amplitude modulating the operational frequency with an AM amplitude and AM frequency, and (b) sweeping the AM frequency through a range of frequencies centered about the AM frequency.
30. A generator according to claim 29, wherein the AM control means sweeps the AM frequency through a range within about 10-20% above and below the AM frequency.
31. A generator according to claim 23, wherein the frequency generation means comprises means for driving two or more transducers having overlapping resonant bandwidths, and wherein the sweep rate means comprises means for sweeping the frequencies through the overlapping bandwidths to produce broadband ultrasound.
32. A system for delivering ultiasound to liquid, comprising: one or more ultrasonic transducers, each transducer having an operating frequency within an ultrasound bandwidth; and an ultrasound generator means for driving the transducers at frequencies within the bandwidth, the generator being amplitude modulated at a modulation frequency and having AM frequency sweep means for sweeping the modulation frequency as a function of time, the generator means and transducers being constructed and arranged so as to produce amplitude modulated ultrasound within the liquid.
33. A system according to claims 32, wherein the AM frequency sweep means comprises means for providing an AM sweep rate between about lhz and lOOhz.
34. A system according to claim 32, further comprising clamping means for applying compression to at least one of the transducers.
35. A system according to claim 32, wherein the operating frequency is a harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
36. A system according to claims 1, 12, 14 or 32, wherein the generator means comprises two or more ultrasound generators that are synchronized in magnitude and phase so that there is substantially zero frequency difference between signals generated by the generators.
37. A system according to claims 36, further comprising timing means for generating a timing signal between the generators to synchronize the signals.
38. A system according to claims 36, further comprising FM means for generating a master frequency modulated signal to each generator to synchronize the signals from the generators.
39. A system according to claims 5 or 12, wherein the generator means is frequency modulated over a range of frequencies within the bandwidth of each transducer.
40. A system according to claims 5 or 12, wherein the generator means is frequency modulated over a range of frequencies within the bandwidth of each transducer, and wherein the generator means is amplitude modulated over a range of frequencies within the bandwidth of each transducer.
41. A system according to claims 1, 12, 14 or 32, further comprising a chamber for holding the solution so as to clean or process objects therein.
42. A system according to claim 41, wherein the chamber comprises a material selected from the group of 316L stainless steel, 304 stainless steel, polytetiafluoroethylene, fluorinated ethylene propylene, polyvinylidine fluoride, perfluoroalkoxy, polypropylene, tantalum, teflon coated stainless steel, titanium, hastalloy, polyetheretherketone, and mixtures thereof.
43. A system according to claims 1, 12, 14 or 32, wherein one or more transducer comprises a transducer array.
44. A system according to claims 1, 12, 14 or 32, wherein each transducer comprises an array of ultrasound transducer elements, each element within the array being driven at substantially the same frequency as other elements within the same array.
45. A system according to claims 1, 12, 14 or 32, wherein each transducer comprises one of the first, second, third or fourth harmonics frequencies .
46. A system according to claims 1, 12, 14 or 32, further comprising a liquid, the liquid being responsive to the ultrasound to produce cavitation implosion therein.
47. A system according to claim 46, wherein the liquid comprises one or more chemicals selected from the group of solvents, aqueous solutions, and semi-aqueous solutions.
48. A multi-tank system for delivering ultiasound to liquid within each tank, comprising: a plurality of tanks and at least one ultrasound transducer array within each tank, each transducer array having a resonant frequency and an associated bandwidth that is substantially centered about the resonant frequency; at least one ultrasound generator associated with each tank, each generator driving at least one transducer array at frequencies within the bandwidth, the transducer array and generator, within each tank, being constructed and arranged so as to produce ultrasound therein, each of the generators having frequency sweep means for sweeping the frequency within the bandwidth so as to improve processing characteristics within the liquid; and a master control module having FM generator means, connected to the ultrasound generators, to synchronize the frequencies between the ultiasound generators and to reduce beat frequencies between the tanks.
49. A multi-tank system according to claim 48, further comprising clamping means for applying compression to each tiansducer array.
50. A multi-tank system according to claim 48, wherein at least one of the arrays has a resonant frequency that is a harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and
350khz.
51. A multi-tank system according to claim 48, further comprising at least one other array within each tank, the arrays within each tank having overlapping bandwidths, the arrays and generator of each tank being constructed and arranged so as to produce, in combination, ultrasound with a combined bandwidth that is greater than the bandwidth of any single array.
52. A multi-tank system according to claim 48, wherein at least one generator comprises AM control means for providing amplitude modulation of the ultrasound at an AM frequency.
53. A multi-tank system according to claim 52, wherein the AM control means further comprises means for sweeping the AM frequency through a range of frequencies centered substantially about the AM frequency.
54. A multi-tank system according to claim 53, wherein the AM control means comprises means for sweeping the AM frequency through a range of frequencies within about the 10-20% of above and below the AM frequency.
55. A multi-tank system according to claim 53, further comprising means for connecting at least one of the generators to a power line having a power line frequency, and further comprising AM control means for modulating the ultrasound with an AM amplitude, the AM control means rectifying the power line frequency and selecting a portion of a sinusoid of the rectified power line frequency to adjust the AM amplitude selectively.
56. A single tank, multi-generator ultiasound system for applying ultrasound to objects within the tank, comprising: a plurality of generators connected to a common multiplexer, each generator having a different frequency, the multiplexer having a single output connected to a plurality of ultrasound transducers within the tank, each transducer having a resonant frequency and one or more harmonic frequencies that correspond to the different frequencies of the generators, the multiplexer, generators, and transducers being constructed and arranged wherein one generator drives each of the transducers with substantially the same frequency, the one generator being selectable by a user of the system and through the multiplexer so as to select the desired frequency range, and hence the right generator, according to the cavitation implosion energy that is desired within the tank.
57. A single tank, multi-generator ultrasound system for applying ultrasound to objects within the tank, comprising: a plurality of generators, each generator connected to a different ultrasound tiansducer array so as to generate ultrasound within the tank, each transducer having a resonant frequency and one or more harmonic frequencies, a master control module having FM generator means, connected to the ultrasound generators, to synchronize the frequencies between the generators, the generators, FM generator means and transducers being constructed and arranged so as to synchronize the ultrasound frequencies between transducers to substantially eliminate beat frequencies within the tank.
58. A single tank, multi-generator ultrasound system according to claim 57, wherein the generators drive the transducer arrays at a frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
59. A single tank, multi-generator ultrasound system according to claim 57, wherein at least one of the transducer arrays has an operational bandwidth centered about the resonant frequency or one of the harmonic frequencies, and wherein one or more of the generators comprise frequency sweep means for sweeping the frequency within the bandwidth and at a sweep rate frequency so as to improve processing characteristics within the liquid.
60. A single tank, multi-generator ultrasound system according to claim 59, wherein the frequency sweep means comprises means for sweeping the sweep rate at a range of frequencies centered about the sweep rate frequency.
61. A method of delivering broadband ultiasound to liquid, comprising the steps of driving a first ultrasound transducer with an ultiasonic generator at a first frequency and within a first ultrasound bandwidth, and driving a second ultrasound transducer with an ultrasonic generator at a second frequency and within a second ultiasound bandwidth that overlaps at least part of the first bandwidth, wherein the first and second transducers, in combination with the generator, produce ultrasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than either of the first or second bandwidths.
62. A method according to claim 61, further comprising the step of compressing at least one of the transducers.
63. A method according to claim 61, further comprising the step of driving the first and second transducers at harmonic frequencies between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
64. A method according to claim 61, further comprising the step of arranging the bandwidths to overlap so as to produce ultiasonic energy, at each frequency, that is within a factor of two of ultiasonic energy produced at any other frequency within the combined bandwidth.
65. A method of delivering ultrasound to liquid, comprising the steps of (a) arranging one or more transducer arrays with an ultrasound tank so as to couple ultrasound energy between the transducer arrays and the liquid, each of the transducer arrays being compressed to structurally protect the transducer array, each of the transducer arrays having a harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz, and (b) driving the ultiasonic transducer array at a range of frequencies centered about the harmonic frequency.
66. A method according to claim 65, further comprising the step of driving the transducer array through the range of frequencies at a sweep rate.
67. A method according to claim 66, further comprising the step of varying the sweep rate so that the sweep rate is substantially non-constant.
68 A method according to claim 65, further comprising the steps of (a) arranging one or more synergistic transducer arrays with an ultrasound tank so as to couple synergistic ultrasound energy between the synergistic tiansducer arrays and the liquid, each of the synergistic tiansducer arrays being compressed to structurally protect the synergistic transducer array, each of the synergistic transducer arrays having a harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz, and (b) driving the transducer arrays so as to produce ultiasound within the liquid and with a combined bandwidth that is greater than the bandwidth of a single transducer.
69. A method for delivering ultrasound to liquid, comprising the steps of (a) coupling one or more ultrasonic transducer arrays to the liquid, (b) driving, with a generator, the tiansducer arrays to an operating frequency within an ultiasound bandwidth to generate ultrasound within the liquid, and (c) sweeping the frequency through the bandwidth at a substantially non-constant sweep rate to reduce resonances within the liquid.
70. A method according to claim 69, further comprising the step of sweeping the frequency within the bandwidth at a sweep rate that varies according to one of the following functions: linearly as a function of time and randomly.
71. A method according to claim 69, further comprising the step of applying compression to at least one of the transducer arrays to structurally protect the array.
72. A method according to claim 69, further comprising the step of driving the transducer arrays at a harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz.
73. A method of delivering ultrasound to liquid, comprising the steps of generating a drive signal for one or more ultrasonic transducer arrays having an operating frequency within an operational bandwidth, amplitude modulating the drive signal at a modulation frequency, and changing the modulation frequency, selectively, so as to produce ultrasound within the liquid and to substantially eliminate resonances at the modulation frequency.
74. A method of amplitude modulating an ultrasonic generator connected to a power line having a power line frequency, comprising the steps of: rectifying the power line frequency in a full wave modulation pattern, and selecting a portion of a leading quarter sinusoid of the pattern that ends at a selected amplitude in a region between zero and 90° and between 180° and 270° of the sinusoid.
75. A method of amplitude modulating an ultrasonic generator connected to a power line having a power line frequency, comprising the steps of: rectifying the power line frequency in a half wave modulation pattern, and selecting a portion of a leading quarter sinusoid of the pattern that ends at a selected amplitude between zero and 90° of the sinusoid.
76. A generator for driving at least one ultiasonic transducer array with variable AM modulation amplitudes, comprising: frequency generation means for driving the tiansducer array at an operational frequency within a range of frequencies that are centered about a resonant frequency of the transducer; means for connecting the generator to a power line having a power line frequency; and means for rectifying the power line frequency in a modulation pattern, and for selecting a portion of a sinusoid of the pattern to acquire the AM amplitude selectively.
77. A generator according to claim 76, further comprising means for rectifying the power line frequency in a full wave modulation pattern, and selecting a portion of a leading quarter sinusoid of the pattern that ends at a selected amplitude in a region between zero and 90° and between 180° and 270° of the sinusoid.
78. A generator according to claim 76, further comprising means for rectifying the power line frequency in a half wave modulation pattern, and selecting a portion of a leading quarter sinusoid of the pattern that ends at a selected amplitude between zero and 90° of the sinusoid.
79. A generator according to claim 76, further comprising sweep rate means for sweeping the operational frequency through the range of frequencies at a sweep rate frequency.
80. A generator according to claim 79, further comprising double sweep rate means for sweeping the sweep rate frequency through a range of frequencies about the sweep rate frequency so that the sweep rate is substantially non-constant.
81. An ultiasonic transducer, comprising: one or more elements responsive to ultrasonic frequencies; means for compressing the elements so as to structurally protect the elements, the elements and the means for compressing having a combined harmonic frequency between about lOOkhz and 350khz; and electrode means for connecting the elements to an ultrasonic generator.
82. A tiansducer according to claim 81, wherein the elements comprise material selected from the group of piezoelectiics and ceramics.
83. A transducer according to claim 81, wherein the means for compressing comprises a backplate and a drive plate.
84. Ultiasonic transducer apparatus for producing ultrasonic energy within an ultrasonic processing tank, comprising: a front plate for mounting the apparatus to the tank; a shaped backplate; and one or more ceramic elements compressed between the front plate and the back plate, the elements being responsive to electrical energy to produce the ultrasound energy, the backplate being shaped such that the backplate, elements and front plate resonate at a range of harmonic frequencies.
85. Ultrasonic transducer apparatus according to claim 84, wherein the backplate forms a shape that flattens the impedance of the apparatus over the range of frequencies.
86. Ultiasonic transducer apparatus according to claim 84, further comprising a bolt connected between the front plate and backplate, the bolt providing compressive force on the elements.
87. Ultiasonic transducer apparatus according to claim 86, wherein the bolt provides approximately 5,000 pounds of force on the elements.
88. Ultiasonic transducer apparatus according to claim 84, further comprising lead outs connected with the elements for connection with an ultrasonic generator.
89. Ultiasonic transducer apparatus according to claim 84, wherein the elements comprise a pair of ceramic elements, the ceramic elements being oriented to provide cooperative expansion and contraction when connected in circuit with a common drive generator.
90. Ultrasonic transducer apparatus according to claim 84, wherein the harmonic frequencies are greater than about 100kHz.
91. Ultiasonic transducer apparatus according to claim 90, wherein the harmonic frequencies are less than about 350kHz.
PCT/US1997/012853 1996-08-05 1997-08-01 Apparatus and methods for cleaning delicate parts WO1998006143A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU39621/97A AU3962197A (en) 1996-08-05 1997-08-01 Apparatus and methods for cleaning delicate parts
CA002262540A CA2262540C (en) 1996-08-05 1997-08-01 Apparatus and methods for cleaning delicate parts

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US2315096P 1996-08-05 1996-08-05
US60/023,150 1996-08-05
US08/718,945 US5834871A (en) 1996-08-05 1996-09-24 Apparatus and methods for cleaning and/or processing delicate parts
US08/718,945 1996-09-24

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1998006143A1 true WO1998006143A1 (en) 1998-02-12

Family

ID=26696789

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1997/012853 WO1998006143A1 (en) 1996-08-05 1997-08-01 Apparatus and methods for cleaning delicate parts

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (6) US5834871A (en)
AU (1) AU3962197A (en)
CA (1) CA2262540C (en)
MY (1) MY121247A (en)
TW (1) TW407066B (en)
WO (1) WO1998006143A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7210354B2 (en) 1997-06-16 2007-05-01 Puskas William L Sensing system for measuring cavitation
FR3061835A1 (en) * 2017-01-17 2018-07-20 Gil Ching DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TREATING HIGH-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC WAVES
EP2217891B1 (en) * 2007-11-13 2019-02-27 Johnson Matthey PLC Level measurement system
CN114204583A (en) * 2021-11-24 2022-03-18 华北电力大学 Device parameter design method for inhibiting medium-frequency and high-frequency oscillation of flexible direct-current transmission
WO2023072486A1 (en) * 2021-10-29 2023-05-04 Endress+Hauser Flowtec Ag Ultrasonic sensor for an ultrasonic measuring device, and ultrasonic measuring device

Families Citing this family (132)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5834871A (en) * 1996-08-05 1998-11-10 Puskas; William L. Apparatus and methods for cleaning and/or processing delicate parts
US6016821A (en) * 1996-09-24 2000-01-25 Puskas; William L. Systems and methods for ultrasonically processing delicate parts
US6653760B1 (en) * 1996-05-09 2003-11-25 Crest Ultrasonics Corporation Ultrasonic transducer using third harmonic frequency
US20060086604A1 (en) * 1996-09-24 2006-04-27 Puskas William L Organism inactivation method and system
US7336019B1 (en) 2005-07-01 2008-02-26 Puskas William L Apparatus, circuitry, signals, probes and methods for cleaning and/or processing with sound
US8075695B2 (en) * 1996-08-05 2011-12-13 Puskas William L Apparatus, circuitry, signals, probes and methods for cleaning and/or processing with sound
US6313565B1 (en) * 2000-02-15 2001-11-06 William L. Puskas Multiple frequency cleaning system
US6822372B2 (en) 1999-08-09 2004-11-23 William L. Puskas Apparatus, circuitry and methods for cleaning and/or processing with sound waves
US6462461B1 (en) 2000-06-30 2002-10-08 William L. Puskas Circuitry to modify the operation of ultrasonic generators
US7629726B2 (en) * 2007-07-11 2009-12-08 Puskas William L Ultrasound system
US20080047575A1 (en) * 1996-09-24 2008-02-28 Puskas William L Apparatus, circuitry, signals and methods for cleaning and processing with sound
US6039059A (en) 1996-09-30 2000-03-21 Verteq, Inc. Wafer cleaning system
US5925966A (en) * 1997-08-08 1999-07-20 Green Clouds Ltd. Method for protecting ultrasonic transducers from deterioration
US6290778B1 (en) 1998-08-12 2001-09-18 Hudson Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for sonic cleaning of heat exchangers
US6424076B1 (en) * 1998-10-07 2002-07-23 The B. F. Goodrich Company Incremental switched deformable mirror
US6492284B2 (en) * 1999-01-22 2002-12-10 Semitool, Inc. Reactor for processing a workpiece using sonic energy
US6799583B2 (en) * 1999-05-13 2004-10-05 Suraj Puri Methods for cleaning microelectronic substrates using ultradilute cleaning liquids
JP2000325882A (en) * 1999-05-24 2000-11-28 Nec Corp Piezoelectric drive circuit and drive method
US6276370B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2001-08-21 International Business Machines Corporation Sonic cleaning with an interference signal
US6503081B1 (en) 1999-07-01 2003-01-07 James Feine Ultrasonic control apparatus and method
WO2001019539A2 (en) 1999-09-14 2001-03-22 Meldrum Charles A Produce washing system utilizing multiple energy sources
AU7383300A (en) 1999-09-14 2001-04-17 Charles A. Meldrum Multiple-stage energy-efficient produce processing system
US6372389B1 (en) 1999-11-19 2002-04-16 Oki Electric Industry Co, Ltd. Method and apparatus for forming resist pattern
US7451774B2 (en) * 2000-06-26 2008-11-18 Applied Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for wafer cleaning
EP1295314A2 (en) * 2000-06-26 2003-03-26 Applied Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for wafer cleaning
US20020157685A1 (en) * 2000-09-11 2002-10-31 Naoya Hayamizu Washing method, method of manufacturing semiconductor device and method of manufacturing active matrix-type display device
DE10109932A1 (en) * 2001-02-21 2002-08-22 Brunner Und Joachim Straka Johann Piezo element for ultrasound generation and piezoelectric transducer
EP1238715A1 (en) * 2001-03-05 2002-09-11 Prokic Miodrag Multifrequency ultrasonic structural actuators
JP5067821B2 (en) * 2001-04-13 2012-11-07 古野電気株式会社 Multi-frequency transducer
US7019439B2 (en) 2001-07-30 2006-03-28 Blackstone-Ney Ultrasonics, Inc. High power ultrasonic transducer with broadband frequency characteristics at all overtones and harmonics
JP3948960B2 (en) * 2002-01-16 2007-07-25 東京エレクトロン株式会社 Ultrasonic cleaning equipment
KR20050103916A (en) * 2003-02-04 2005-11-01 포워드 테크놀로지 에이 크레스트 그룹 컴퍼니 Ultrasonic cleaning tank
US6691578B1 (en) * 2003-02-28 2004-02-17 William L. Puskas Measurement systems for ultrasound in a vessel
WO2004103014A2 (en) * 2003-05-09 2004-11-25 The Crest Group, Inc. Advanced ceramics in ultrasonic transducerized devices
US6890390B2 (en) * 2003-05-22 2005-05-10 Lawrence Azar Method for ultrasonic cleaning using phased transducer arrays
EP1635959A2 (en) * 2003-06-12 2006-03-22 Sez Ag Uniform cavitation for particle removal
EP1652224A2 (en) * 2003-07-31 2006-05-03 FSI International, Inc. Controlled growth of highly uniform, oxide layers, especially ultrathin layers
IL157229A (en) * 2003-08-04 2006-08-20 Zamir Tribelsky Method for energy coupling especially useful for disinfecting and various systems using it
GB0319040D0 (en) * 2003-08-13 2003-09-17 Unilever Plc Blanching vegetables
US7495371B2 (en) * 2003-09-08 2009-02-24 The Crest Group, Inc. Cleaning tank with sleeved ultrasonic transducer
WO2005027202A1 (en) * 2003-09-11 2005-03-24 Fsi International, Inc. Semiconductor wafer immersion systems and treatments using modulated acoustic energy
US20050072625A1 (en) * 2003-09-11 2005-04-07 Christenson Kurt K. Acoustic diffusers for acoustic field uniformity
US20050077182A1 (en) * 2003-10-10 2005-04-14 Applied Materials, Inc. Volume measurement apparatus and method
WO2005044440A2 (en) * 2003-11-05 2005-05-19 The Crest Group, Inc. Ultrasonic apparatus with multiple frequency transducers
EP1696818B2 (en) * 2003-12-15 2018-08-15 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Changing amplitude of movement by changing the drive frequency of a toothbrush brushhead
CN101124053B (en) * 2004-09-15 2012-05-23 艾奎昂技术股份有限公司 System and method of powering a sonic energy source and use of the same to process substrates
JP2008515612A (en) * 2004-09-20 2008-05-15 ドミニオン エンジニアリング、インコーポレイテッド Improved transportable high power ultrasonic transducer device
US20060130870A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-06-22 Ping Cai Method for sonic cleaning of reactor with reduced acoustic wave cancellation
DE102005021985A1 (en) * 2005-05-09 2006-11-16 Rena Sondermaschinen Gmbh Sound generation and emission method for cleaning articles immersed in fluid involves generating signals that are modulated according to frequency or intensity
US20070103034A1 (en) * 2005-11-04 2007-05-10 Impulse Devices Inc. Acoustic driver assembly with increased head mass displacement amplitude
TWI393595B (en) * 2006-03-17 2013-04-21 Michale Goodson J Megasonic processing apparatus with frequencey sweeping of thickness mode transducers
US20070235058A1 (en) * 2006-04-10 2007-10-11 Daniel Harrington System and method for removing residue from a wafer processing chamber using sound waves
TWI352628B (en) * 2006-07-21 2011-11-21 Akrion Technologies Inc Nozzle for use in the megasonic cleaning of substr
JP4776689B2 (en) * 2006-09-22 2011-09-21 株式会社カイジョー Ultrasonic cleaning equipment
US7669478B2 (en) * 2006-10-13 2010-03-02 Zmi Electronics Ltd. Ultrasonic driving device with multi-frequency scanning
US8517728B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2013-08-27 Colgate-Palmolive Company Oral care implement having fluid delivery system
US20080312460A1 (en) * 2007-06-13 2008-12-18 Goodson J Michael Multi-Frequency Ultrasonic Apparatus and Process for Producing Biofuels
US7530272B2 (en) * 2007-08-15 2009-05-12 Chang Gung University Multiple frequency ultrasound apparatus
WO2009038456A1 (en) * 2007-09-18 2009-03-26 Röntgen Technische Dienst B.V. Inspection device and method for inspection
US20090173358A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2009-07-09 Micron Technology, Inc. Megasonic cleaning with controlled boundary layer thickness and associated systems and methods
AR071017A1 (en) * 2008-03-25 2010-05-19 Albemarle Corp METHODS FOR REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION OF BACTERIA IN EGGS FOR CONSUMPTION
JP2009248066A (en) * 2008-04-11 2009-10-29 Tiyoda Electric Co Ltd Ultrasonic cleaning device
US20100126942A1 (en) * 2008-11-20 2010-05-27 Thottathil Sebastian K Multi-frequency ultrasonic apparatus and process with exposed transmitting head
US20100146713A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-06-17 Yoav Medan Method and Apparatus for Washing Fabrics Using Focused Ultrasound
JP2010162487A (en) * 2009-01-16 2010-07-29 Sony Corp Piezo-electric vibration device system and electrical appliance
US20110132404A1 (en) * 2009-03-16 2011-06-09 Lutz Todd M Method and apparatus for cleaning of laparoscopic surgical instruments
US8331196B2 (en) * 2009-04-14 2012-12-11 Covaris, Inc. System and method for controlling an acoustic transducer
US9475099B2 (en) * 2009-10-12 2016-10-25 Ultrasonic Power Corporation Ultrasonic cleaning system with transducer failure indicator
US8691145B2 (en) * 2009-11-16 2014-04-08 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Ultrasound and acoustophoresis for water purification
CA2790849C (en) * 2010-02-26 2016-07-05 Colgate-Palmolive Company Fluid delivery system for an oral care implement
US20130206165A1 (en) * 2010-03-03 2013-08-15 Ahmed Busnaina Damage Free Cleaning Using Narrow Band Megasonic Cleaning
US8398326B2 (en) 2010-03-04 2013-03-19 Colgate-Palmolive Company Fluid dispensing oral care implement
US20140136366A1 (en) 2012-11-12 2014-05-15 Restaurant Technology Inc. System and method for receiving and managing remotely placed orders
US10640357B2 (en) 2010-04-14 2020-05-05 Restaurant Technology Inc. Structural food preparation systems and methods
US9228785B2 (en) 2010-05-04 2016-01-05 Alexander Poltorak Fractal heat transfer device
US10852069B2 (en) 2010-05-04 2020-12-01 Fractal Heatsink Technologies, LLC System and method for maintaining efficiency of a fractal heat sink
US8956538B2 (en) 2010-06-16 2015-02-17 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Phononic crystal desalination system and methods of use
JP5470186B2 (en) * 2010-07-30 2014-04-16 日本発條株式会社 Inspection device cleanliness inspection device and cleanliness inspection method
US9421553B2 (en) 2010-08-23 2016-08-23 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. High-volume fast separation of multi-phase components in fluid suspensions
MY188904A (en) * 2010-10-05 2022-01-13 Univ Putra Malaysia A method and apparatus for high intensity ultrasonic treatment of baking materials
EP2764844B1 (en) 2011-03-09 2020-07-22 Colgate-Palmolive Company Interdental cleaning device
AU2011363601B2 (en) 2011-03-28 2014-10-23 Colgate-Palmolive Company Toothbrush having oral care fluid delivery
US9190881B1 (en) 2011-08-02 2015-11-17 Tooltek Engineering Corporation Rotary-powered mechanical oscillator
US9086346B2 (en) * 2011-10-21 2015-07-21 National Chung Cheng University Method for processing a sensor chip
US10704021B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2020-07-07 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustic perfusion devices
US10689609B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2020-06-23 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustic bioreactor processes
US9950282B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2018-04-24 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Electronic configuration and control for acoustic standing wave generation
US9796956B2 (en) 2013-11-06 2017-10-24 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Multi-stage acoustophoresis device
US9567559B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2017-02-14 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Bioreactor using acoustic standing waves
US9458450B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2016-10-04 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustophoretic separation technology using multi-dimensional standing waves
US9688958B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2017-06-27 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustic bioreactor processes
US10967298B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2021-04-06 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Driver and control for variable impedence load
US9272234B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2016-03-01 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Separation of multi-component fluid through ultrasonic acoustophoresis
US10370635B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2019-08-06 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustic separation of T cells
US9752114B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2017-09-05 Flodesign Sonics, Inc Bioreactor using acoustic standing waves
US9745548B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2017-08-29 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustic perfusion devices
US10953436B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2021-03-23 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustophoretic device with piezoelectric transducer array
US10322949B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2019-06-18 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Transducer and reflector configurations for an acoustophoretic device
US9752113B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2017-09-05 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustic perfusion devices
US9783775B2 (en) 2012-03-15 2017-10-10 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Bioreactor using acoustic standing waves
US11324873B2 (en) 2012-04-20 2022-05-10 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustic blood separation processes and devices
US10737953B2 (en) 2012-04-20 2020-08-11 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustophoretic method for use in bioreactors
EP2703094B1 (en) 2012-08-27 2019-10-02 IMEC vzw A system for delivering ultrasonic energy to a liquid and its use for cleaning of solid parts
GB2506939B (en) 2012-10-15 2017-04-05 Alphasonics (Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems) Ltd Improvements in and relating to ultrasonic cleaning
IN2015DN03043A (en) 2012-10-26 2015-10-02 Colgate Palmolive Co
US9242340B1 (en) * 2013-03-12 2016-01-26 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Method to stress relieve a magnetic recording head transducer utilizing ultrasonic cavitation
US9675747B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2017-06-13 William L Puskas Methods and systems for improved cavitation efficiency and density, cancer cell destruction, and/or causing a target object to be a cavitation nucleus
US9745569B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2017-08-29 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. System for generating high concentration factors for low cell density suspensions
US9725710B2 (en) 2014-01-08 2017-08-08 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustophoresis device with dual acoustophoretic chamber
US9744483B2 (en) 2014-07-02 2017-08-29 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Large scale acoustic separation device
US10106770B2 (en) 2015-03-24 2018-10-23 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Methods and apparatus for particle aggregation using acoustic standing waves
US11708572B2 (en) 2015-04-29 2023-07-25 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustic cell separation techniques and processes
US11377651B2 (en) 2016-10-19 2022-07-05 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Cell therapy processes utilizing acoustophoresis
CA2984492A1 (en) 2015-04-29 2016-11-03 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustophoretic device for angled wave particle deflection
US11021699B2 (en) 2015-04-29 2021-06-01 FioDesign Sonics, Inc. Separation using angled acoustic waves
BR112017024713B1 (en) 2015-05-20 2022-09-27 Flodesign Sonics, Inc METHOD FOR THE SEPARATION OF A SECOND FLUID OR A PARTICULATE FROM A MAIN FLUID
US10161926B2 (en) 2015-06-11 2018-12-25 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustic methods for separation of cells and pathogens
US9663756B1 (en) 2016-02-25 2017-05-30 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Acoustic separation of cellular supporting materials from cultured cells
CN108025333B (en) 2015-07-09 2020-10-02 弗洛设计声能学公司 Non-planar and asymmetric piezoelectric crystals and reflectors
US11459540B2 (en) 2015-07-28 2022-10-04 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Expanded bed affinity selection
US11474085B2 (en) 2015-07-28 2022-10-18 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Expanded bed affinity selection
US10710006B2 (en) 2016-04-25 2020-07-14 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Piezoelectric transducer for generation of an acoustic standing wave
US11214789B2 (en) 2016-05-03 2022-01-04 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Concentration and washing of particles with acoustics
WO2017192760A1 (en) 2016-05-03 2017-11-09 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Therapeutic cell washing, concentration, and separation utilizing acoustophoresis
US11085035B2 (en) 2016-05-03 2021-08-10 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Therapeutic cell washing, concentration, and separation utilizing acoustophoresis
EP3485215B1 (en) 2016-07-12 2023-06-07 Alexander Poltorak System and method for maintaining efficiency of a heat sink
WO2018075830A1 (en) 2016-10-19 2018-04-26 Flodesign Sonics, Inc. Affinity cell extraction by acoustics
CN106363003B (en) * 2016-11-15 2018-10-23 深圳绿源轩电子技术有限公司 A kind of power circuit being effectively improved ultrasonic cleaning effect
EP3655718A4 (en) 2017-07-17 2021-03-17 Alexander Poltorak Multi-fractal heat sink system and method
KR20220066413A (en) 2017-12-14 2022-05-24 프로디자인 소닉스, 인크. Acoustic transducer drive and controller
US10327736B1 (en) * 2018-04-17 2019-06-25 William L. Puskas Ultrasound transducer arrays and associated systems and methods
EP3972746A1 (en) * 2019-05-23 2022-03-30 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Sensors and method for generating spatially coded sound fields through sound-emitting apertures having a spatially varying frequency and bandwidth

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2891176A (en) * 1955-07-13 1959-06-16 Branson Instr Compressional wave generating apparatus
US3315102A (en) * 1963-01-14 1967-04-18 Electromation Components Corp Piezoelectric liquid cleaning device
US3371233A (en) * 1965-06-28 1968-02-27 Edward G. Cook Multifrequency ultrasonic cleaning equipment
US3746897A (en) * 1971-07-28 1973-07-17 Ultrasonic Systems Ultrasonic multi-frequency system
GB2097890A (en) * 1981-05-01 1982-11-10 Boulton Ltd William Ultrasonic cleaning
US4554477A (en) * 1983-11-25 1985-11-19 Ratcliff Henry K Drive circuit for a plurality of ultrasonic generators using auto follow and frequency sweep
US4633119A (en) * 1984-07-02 1986-12-30 Gould Inc. Broadband multi-resonant longitudinal vibrator transducer
US4736130A (en) * 1987-01-09 1988-04-05 Puskas William L Multiparameter generator for ultrasonic transducers
US5218980A (en) * 1991-10-10 1993-06-15 Evans David H Ultrasonic dishwasher system
US5276376A (en) * 1992-06-09 1994-01-04 Ultrasonic Power Corporation Variable frequency ultrasonic generator with constant power output
US5496411A (en) * 1991-06-14 1996-03-05 Halcro Nominees Pty. Ltd. Ultrasonic vibration generator and use of same for cleaning objects in a volume of liquid

Family Cites Families (96)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US25433A (en) * 1859-09-13 Shingle-machine
US2585103A (en) * 1948-03-08 1952-02-12 Otis A Brown Apparatus for ultrasonic treatment of liquids
USRE25433E (en) * 1956-08-27 1963-08-13 Electromechanical transducer system
US2985003A (en) * 1957-01-11 1961-05-23 Gen Motors Corp Sonic washer
US3066232A (en) * 1959-06-12 1962-11-27 Branson Instr Ultrasonic transducer
US3094314A (en) * 1960-08-02 1963-06-18 Detrex Chem Ind Sandwich type transducer and coupling
US3187207A (en) * 1960-08-08 1965-06-01 Giannini Controls Corp Transducers
US3140859A (en) * 1961-01-17 1964-07-14 Internat Ultrasonics Inc Electroacoustic sandwich transducers
US3152295A (en) * 1961-05-01 1964-10-06 Bendix Corp Pulsed tank circuit magneto-or electrostrictive device excitation
US3191913A (en) * 1961-05-22 1965-06-29 Hal C Mettler Ultrasonic unit
US3230403A (en) * 1961-07-14 1966-01-18 Bendix Corp Prestressed ceramic transducer
US3113761A (en) * 1961-07-26 1963-12-10 Ultrasonic Ind Inc Ultrasonic tank housing
US3218488A (en) * 1961-08-01 1965-11-16 Branson Instr Transducer
US3293456A (en) * 1963-03-18 1966-12-20 Branson Instr Ultrasonic cleaning apparatus
US3318578A (en) * 1965-03-22 1967-05-09 Branson Instr Cleaning apparatus
US3319219A (en) * 1965-03-29 1967-05-09 Dynamics Corp Massa Div Electroacoustic transducer
US3328751A (en) * 1966-03-28 1967-06-27 Dynamics Corp Massa Div Electroacoustic transducer
US3535159A (en) * 1967-12-07 1970-10-20 Branson Instr Method and apparatus for applying ultrasonic energy to a workpiece
US3433462A (en) * 1968-01-19 1969-03-18 Crest Ultrasonics Corp Method and apparatus for resonating small piezoelectric crystals at low frequencies
SE329037B (en) * 1969-02-20 1970-09-28 Philips Nv
US3727112A (en) * 1969-08-29 1973-04-10 Surgical Design Corp Generator for producing ultrasonic energy
US3629726A (en) * 1969-08-29 1971-12-21 Surgical Design Corp Oscillator and oscillator control circuit
GB1331100A (en) * 1969-11-03 1973-09-19 Crest Ultrasonics Corp Transducer suitable for use with ultrasonic processing tanks
GB1323196A (en) * 1970-04-27 1973-07-11 Luke Eng Pty Ltd Kg Electromechanical transducer
US3648188A (en) * 1970-06-10 1972-03-07 Bendix Corp Transistor power amplifier
US3638087A (en) * 1970-08-17 1972-01-25 Bendix Corp Gated power supply for sonic cleaners
US3651352A (en) * 1970-12-10 1972-03-21 Branson Instr Oscillatory circuit for ultrasonic cleaning apparatus
US3690333A (en) * 1971-05-17 1972-09-12 Hans Kierner Machine for cleaning small parts
US3735159A (en) * 1972-01-24 1973-05-22 E Murry Method and apparatus for translating ultrasonic energy
US3778758A (en) * 1972-09-25 1973-12-11 Us Navy Transducer
US3804329A (en) * 1973-07-27 1974-04-16 J Martner Ultrasonic generator and atomizer apparatus and method
GB1488252A (en) * 1973-12-15 1977-10-12 Kerry Ultrasonics Ultrasonic cleaning apparatus
US3893869A (en) * 1974-05-31 1975-07-08 Rca Corp Megasonic cleaning system
US4120699A (en) * 1974-11-07 1978-10-17 Alvin B. Kennedy, Jr. Method for acoustical cleaning
JPS5635260Y2 (en) * 1975-01-23 1981-08-19
US3975650A (en) * 1975-01-30 1976-08-17 Payne Stephen C Ultrasonic generator drive circuit
GB1537058A (en) * 1975-05-20 1978-12-29 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Ultrasonic generators
GB1571304A (en) * 1976-02-24 1980-07-16 Lucas Industries Ltd Drive circuit for a piezo electric crystal
US4069444A (en) * 1976-06-01 1978-01-17 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Ultrasonic power generator
US4081706A (en) * 1976-10-21 1978-03-28 Delta Sonics, Inc. Oscillatory circuit for an ultrasonic cleaning device with feedback from the piezoelectric transducer
DE2721225C2 (en) * 1977-05-11 1981-10-29 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Circuit arrangement for frequency self-control of an ultrasonic transmitter transducer
FR2391001A1 (en) * 1977-05-18 1978-12-15 Satelec Soc ULTRA-SOUND GENERATOR
US4118649A (en) * 1977-05-25 1978-10-03 Rca Corporation Transducer assembly for megasonic cleaning
US4141608A (en) * 1977-11-10 1979-02-27 L & R Manufacturing Company Circuitry for driving a non-linear transducer for ultrasonic cleaning
FR2446638A1 (en) 1979-01-18 1980-08-14 Aussenac Jack SOUND-ACTINIC DEVICE FOR CLEANING AND AEPING
JPS5610792A (en) * 1979-07-06 1981-02-03 Taga Denki Kk Method and circuit for driving ultrasonic-wave converter
CA1167916A (en) * 1979-10-10 1984-05-22 Robert E. White Converter circuit employing pulse-width modulation
US4326553A (en) * 1980-08-28 1982-04-27 Rca Corporation Megasonic jet cleaner apparatus
US5834871A (en) * 1996-08-05 1998-11-10 Puskas; William L. Apparatus and methods for cleaning and/or processing delicate parts
FI61735C (en) * 1981-03-16 1982-09-10 Valmet Oy FOERFARANDE I SAMBAND MED PAPPERSTILLVERKNING
US4418297A (en) * 1981-03-16 1983-11-29 L & R Manufacturing Company Oscillatory resonant transducer driver circuit
US4431975A (en) * 1981-04-16 1984-02-14 Ultrasonic Power Corporation Oscillator circuit for ultrasonic cleaning
US4409999A (en) * 1981-08-07 1983-10-18 Pedziwiatr Edward A Automatic ultrasonic cleaning apparatus
JPS5850898A (en) * 1981-09-21 1983-03-25 Nec Corp Bolt-clamped langevin oscillator
US4439847A (en) * 1981-12-21 1984-03-27 The Stoneleigh Trust High efficiency broadband directional sonar transducer
US4398925A (en) * 1982-01-21 1983-08-16 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Acoustic bubble removal method
DE3314609A1 (en) * 1983-04-22 1984-10-25 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ULTRASONIC VIBRATOR FOR LIQUID SPRAYING
FR2570916B1 (en) * 1983-06-23 1988-04-15 France Etat Armement ELECTRO-ACOUSTIC TRANSDUCER AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING OR RECEIVING ACOUSTIC WAVES IN SEVERAL BANDWIDTHS
US4527901A (en) * 1983-11-21 1985-07-09 Ultrasonic Power Corporation Ultrasonic cleaning tank
GB2161037A (en) * 1984-06-29 1986-01-02 Philips Electronic Associated Inverter circuit arrangement
US4543130A (en) * 1984-08-28 1985-09-24 Rca Corporation Megasonic cleaning apparatus and method
US4559826A (en) * 1984-09-14 1985-12-24 Tab Leasing Precision source of acoustic radiation
GB2170663B (en) * 1985-02-02 1989-06-14 Brian Ernest Attwood Harmonic-resonant power supply
US4864547A (en) * 1986-05-20 1989-09-05 Crestek, Inc. Regulated ultrasonic generator
JPS6276399A (en) * 1985-09-28 1987-04-08 Sadayuki Ueha High-frequency langevin type vibrator
US5119840A (en) * 1986-04-07 1992-06-09 Kaijo Kenki Co., Ltd. Ultrasonic oscillating device and ultrasonic washing apparatus using the same
US4743789A (en) * 1987-01-12 1988-05-10 Puskas William L Variable frequency drive circuit
US4788992A (en) * 1987-04-28 1988-12-06 Lewis Corporation Ultrasonic strip cleaning apparatus
US4804007A (en) * 1987-04-29 1989-02-14 Verteq, Inc. Cleaning apparatus
US5037481B1 (en) * 1987-04-29 1993-05-11 Verteq, Inc. Megasonic cleaning method
US4998549A (en) * 1987-04-29 1991-03-12 Verteq, Inc. Megasonic cleaning apparatus
US4869278A (en) * 1987-04-29 1989-09-26 Bran Mario E Megasonic cleaning apparatus
JPS6411253A (en) * 1987-06-23 1989-01-13 Polaroid Corp Exposer for image former
US4836684A (en) * 1988-02-18 1989-06-06 Ultrasonic Power Corporation Ultrasonic cleaning apparatus with phase diversifier
US5305737A (en) * 1988-03-30 1994-04-26 Arjo Inc. Ultrasonic treatment system
US4854337A (en) * 1988-05-24 1989-08-08 Eastman Kodak Company Apparatus for treating wafers utilizing megasonic energy
US5037208A (en) * 1989-04-06 1991-08-06 Branson Ultrasonics Corporation Immersible transducer assembly
US4979994A (en) * 1989-04-06 1990-12-25 Branson Ultrasonics Corporation Method and apparatus for cleaning by ultrasonic wave energy
US5109174A (en) * 1989-11-22 1992-04-28 Mdt Corporation Ultrasonic cleaner
US5148823A (en) * 1990-10-16 1992-09-22 Verteg, Inc. Single chamber megasonic energy cleaner
US5090432A (en) * 1990-10-16 1992-02-25 Verteq, Inc. Single wafer megasonic semiconductor wafer processing system
US5143103A (en) * 1991-01-04 1992-09-01 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus for cleaning and drying workpieces
US5201958A (en) * 1991-11-12 1993-04-13 Electronic Controls Design, Inc. Closed-loop dual-cycle printed circuit board cleaning apparatus and method
US5247954A (en) * 1991-11-12 1993-09-28 Submicron Systems, Inc. Megasonic cleaning system
US5365960A (en) * 1993-04-05 1994-11-22 Verteq, Inc. Megasonic transducer assembly
US5355048A (en) * 1993-07-21 1994-10-11 Fsi International, Inc. Megasonic transducer for cleaning substrate surfaces
JPH07163954A (en) 1993-12-13 1995-06-27 Yoshihide Shibano Cleaning method and cleaner
US5534076A (en) * 1994-10-03 1996-07-09 Verteg, Inc. Megasonic cleaning system
WO1997042790A1 (en) * 1996-05-09 1997-11-13 Crest Ultrasonics Corp. Ultrasonic transducer
US6822372B2 (en) * 1999-08-09 2004-11-23 William L. Puskas Apparatus, circuitry and methods for cleaning and/or processing with sound waves
WO1998027529A1 (en) * 1996-12-16 1998-06-25 Mannesmann Ag Process for transmitting route information which concerns a route of a vehicle in a road network between a traffic information centre and a terminal in a vehicle, traffic information centre and terminal
US6394111B1 (en) 1997-06-11 2002-05-28 Ethicon, Inc. Detection of cleanliness of a medical device during a washing process
US6150753A (en) * 1997-12-15 2000-11-21 Cae Blackstone Ultrasonic transducer assembly having a cobalt-base alloy housing
JP3180086B2 (en) 1998-08-31 2001-06-25 株式会社シーメディア Mobile communication device, information transmission system and method, non-contact IC media usable in mobile communication device
US6333703B1 (en) * 1998-11-24 2001-12-25 International Business Machines Corporation Automated traffic mapping using sampling and analysis
US6295873B1 (en) 1999-07-22 2001-10-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Ultrasonic sensor and method of use

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2891176A (en) * 1955-07-13 1959-06-16 Branson Instr Compressional wave generating apparatus
US3315102A (en) * 1963-01-14 1967-04-18 Electromation Components Corp Piezoelectric liquid cleaning device
US3371233A (en) * 1965-06-28 1968-02-27 Edward G. Cook Multifrequency ultrasonic cleaning equipment
US3746897A (en) * 1971-07-28 1973-07-17 Ultrasonic Systems Ultrasonic multi-frequency system
GB2097890A (en) * 1981-05-01 1982-11-10 Boulton Ltd William Ultrasonic cleaning
US4554477A (en) * 1983-11-25 1985-11-19 Ratcliff Henry K Drive circuit for a plurality of ultrasonic generators using auto follow and frequency sweep
US4633119A (en) * 1984-07-02 1986-12-30 Gould Inc. Broadband multi-resonant longitudinal vibrator transducer
US4736130A (en) * 1987-01-09 1988-04-05 Puskas William L Multiparameter generator for ultrasonic transducers
US5496411A (en) * 1991-06-14 1996-03-05 Halcro Nominees Pty. Ltd. Ultrasonic vibration generator and use of same for cleaning objects in a volume of liquid
US5218980A (en) * 1991-10-10 1993-06-15 Evans David H Ultrasonic dishwasher system
US5276376A (en) * 1992-06-09 1994-01-04 Ultrasonic Power Corporation Variable frequency ultrasonic generator with constant power output

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7210354B2 (en) 1997-06-16 2007-05-01 Puskas William L Sensing system for measuring cavitation
EP2217891B1 (en) * 2007-11-13 2019-02-27 Johnson Matthey PLC Level measurement system
FR3061835A1 (en) * 2017-01-17 2018-07-20 Gil Ching DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TREATING HIGH-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC WAVES
FR3061836A1 (en) * 2017-01-17 2018-07-20 Gil Ching DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CLEANING AND / OR DECONTAMINATING FOODS WITH HIGH FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC WAVES
WO2018134181A1 (en) * 2017-01-17 2018-07-26 Université D'avignon Et Des Pays De Vaucluse Device and method for treating with high-frequency acoustic waves
WO2023072486A1 (en) * 2021-10-29 2023-05-04 Endress+Hauser Flowtec Ag Ultrasonic sensor for an ultrasonic measuring device, and ultrasonic measuring device
CN114204583A (en) * 2021-11-24 2022-03-18 华北电力大学 Device parameter design method for inhibiting medium-frequency and high-frequency oscillation of flexible direct-current transmission
CN114204583B (en) * 2021-11-24 2023-12-05 华北电力大学 Device parameter design method for inhibiting intermediate frequency and high frequency oscillation of flexible direct current transmission

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MY121247A (en) 2006-01-28
AU3962197A (en) 1998-02-25
US6433460B1 (en) 2002-08-13
CA2262540A1 (en) 1998-02-12
US20040182414A1 (en) 2004-09-23
US6914364B2 (en) 2005-07-05
TW407066B (en) 2000-10-01
US6002195A (en) 1999-12-14
US6181051B1 (en) 2001-01-30
US20020171331A1 (en) 2002-11-21
CA2262540C (en) 2008-02-05
US6946773B2 (en) 2005-09-20
US5834871A (en) 1998-11-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2262540C (en) Apparatus and methods for cleaning delicate parts
EP1997159B1 (en) Megasonic processing apparatus with frequency sweeping of thickness mode transducers
US6172444B1 (en) Power system for impressing AC voltage across a capacitive element
US7211928B2 (en) Apparatus, circuitry, signals and methods for cleaning and/or processing with sound
US7336019B1 (en) Apparatus, circuitry, signals, probes and methods for cleaning and/or processing with sound
US6822372B2 (en) Apparatus, circuitry and methods for cleaning and/or processing with sound waves
US7741753B2 (en) Megasonic apparatus, circuitry, signals and methods for cleaning and/or processing
US7211927B2 (en) Multi-generator system for an ultrasonic processing tank
US9610617B2 (en) Megasonic multifrequency apparatus with matched transducer
US20060027254A1 (en) Apparatus to produce acoustic cavitation in a liquid insonification medium
US8075695B2 (en) Apparatus, circuitry, signals, probes and methods for cleaning and/or processing with sound
US20080047575A1 (en) Apparatus, circuitry, signals and methods for cleaning and processing with sound
WO2003099474A1 (en) Method and apparatus for producing acoustic cavitation
WO1998058417A1 (en) Systems for ultrasonically processing delicate parts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AM AT AU BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LR LT LU LV MD MG MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TT UA UZ VN

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
CFP Corrected version of a pamphlet front page

Free format text: REVISED ABSTRACT RECEIVED BY THE INTERNATIONAL BUREAU AFTER COMPLETION OF THE TECHNICAL PREPARATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2262540

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2262540

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1998507957

Format of ref document f/p: F

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase